"Chris Jones Dismissed by Louisville: Latest Details, Comments and Reaction"

From Bleacher Report

Analysis by Tyler Murphy in SRM 334 (section 1)

Within the past two weeks the University of Louisville released a statement that their basketball player Chris Jones was being released due to his charges with the police department. Jones was charged with rape and sodomy, and a warrant has been issued for his arrest. Another issue arose when a female student reported Jones had texted her and threatened to “slap the f*** out of her.” The Louisville head basketball coach, Rick Pitino had come out and said that he will no longer be apart of the team and no further comments will be made.

We did our power point on crisis management and what the University could have done to further prevent this crisis. The athletic spokesman for Louisville, Kenny Klein, had no comment on the report and let the media be the first to tell the public. Travis and I both agreed that he should’ve addressed the fans and public before the media to keep the image at Louisville upheld. The university a have had multiple incidences in the past 2 years dealing with suspensions and releases of players on the team.

I commend the University for releasing the player after finding out the true evidence, but something needs to be done to prevent these accidents from occurring because its starting to become a regular occurrence. Background checks before scholarship offers, curfews during the season, and more strict rules to abide by are multiple options for actions that could be taken to limit these problems.

Overall the crime has already been committed and there is nothing else to be done except serve your punishment. The university, along with Chris Jones, but can learn from this incidence and ensure that nothing like this happens again. On the university side, if it does happen again, they need to handle the situation better and address the media before the fans hear from other sources.

---

Analysis by Travis Oyler in SRM 334 (section 1)

Over the past two weeks, The University of Louisville Men’s Basketball program has been in the media spotlight over the suspension and dismissal of one of their star players. Chris Jones, a senior at Louisville, was suspended and dismissed from the team for disciplinary reasons. Jones was first suspended from the team February 17 for sending threatening text messages to a female. With Jones out of the lineup, Louisville lost their following game to Syracuse by a score of 59-69. Jones was then allowed to rejoin the team under strict disciplinary measures, and in their next game, Jones led Louisville in a comeback to beat Miami. Jones was then dismissed from the team the next day after being charged with two counts of rape. Louisville will now go on this season without their star point guard.

This article is relevant to sports communication because the negative attention that Louisville now faces will have to be battled with good public relations and crisis management. Personally, I believe that Louisville did all of the right things before Jones was finally dismissed from the team. When Jones sent threatening text messages to his girlfriend on February 17th, Coach Rick Pitino did the right thing by immediately suspending Jones for one game. Louisville gave Jones a second chance to get his act together by placing him back on the team with strict disciplinary measures, but Jones slipped up again on February 22nd, when Jones allegedly raped and sodomized two women and broke his curfew. Louisville made the call to dismiss Jones the next morning which was the right move to protect their brand, but they could have done a better job of getting their version of the story out before the media could get a word in. Overall this situation is a great example of why organizations need to utilize good public relations and crisis management to protect their image.

"Social media push erupts to 'dim lights for Tark'"

From KLAS-TV Las Vegas

Analysis by Samantha O'Brien in SRM 334 (section 2)

Hall of Fame coach of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Jerry Tarkanian passed away last Wednesday, February 11th. He had taken the Runnin’ Rebels to four Final Fours and won the national championship in 1990. Over the course of his coaching career with the Rebels, he had a win-loss ratio of 509-105. His entire coaching career consisted of a 7.90 winning percentage, which is extremely high. He fought and received $2.5 million after a long battle over suing the NCAA for trying to kick him out of college basketball.

After the death of “Tark the Shark,” two Las Vegas locals Tony Cordasco and Scott Gulbransen felt that his life meant much more to Las Vegas than to simply have a public and private funeral. They felt the community, as a whole, should celebrate the life of Coach Jerry Tarkanian. They thought, what better way to do that than to honor him with one of the most noble Las Vegas tributes there is: having the Las Vegas strip dim their lights for a few minutes. This is usually only done for entertainers and Earth Day, but many people believe Coach Tark deserved it too.

The social media, or more specifically, Twitter, blew up once the #DimTheLights4Tark hashtag began trending. Once news spread of his death, it took less than a week for it to take over twitter and actually got most of the hotels and casinos to agree to dim their lights for three minutes in his honor.

Not only was that trending, but there is now also a twitter page called Dim The Lights 4 Tark furthering the campaign. There is now a #PackTheMackInBlack hashtag. This one is to spread the word about the blackout in the gym for the Runnin’ Rebels game this Wednesday (tonight). All players will be wearing black, and they want all of the fans to do it as well, out of respect for Coach Tark. The dimming of the lights will take place a few hours after the game at 10:30 pm PT for three minutes.

This is important to our class because it shows the power of social media. We often see a lot of stories about negative things that athletes, coaches, and administrators do or say, and they spread like wild fire. The same goes for good things too. Two men wanted to do something special for Coach Tark. Less than a week later, they get approval for this tribute, and the news spread through the entire United States. It only took one week for the message to reach all areas of the country, and probably other countries as well. The Internet, social media, is a very powerful tool. When used the right way, we can do great things with it.

"Northwestern Football Puts Personal Touch On Videos Seeking Season-Ticket Renewals"

From SportsBusiness Daily

Analysis by Taylor Tuccito, Alyssa Hall, and Ashley Adams in SRM 435

"Labor board: Northwestern University football players can unionize"

From CNN.com and TSN

Analysis by Reuben Alarico in SRM 435 (section 2)

For our project, we focused our attention on two articles: “Northwestern Players Granted Right to Unionize” by Eric Macramalla and “Northwestern University Players Can Unionize” by Sara Ganim. Overall, they both detailed the situation similarly but they also detailed and went in-depth on different aspects. The first article by Macramalla focuses a lot on the criteria and regulations of being considered a “student-athlete” such as asking for permission to get an off campus job and how you have to accept a coach’s friend on any social media that the player may be using. The second article by Ganim focuses on what the players seek by unionizing such as medical benefits and how Northwestern University may actually eliminate their football program entirely if the players succeed in unionizing so that way they can preserve their academic integrity.

From a marketing and sales standpoint, I believe this situation can help and hurt both parties. I believe that if they succeed in unionizing, then current football players and the football program may be able to target potential recruits and state that their player get treated fairly and so will you. They would also be able to “pitch” them the fact that they will be able to receive medical benefits and possibly see increased stipends. Another marketing strategy that Northwestern University could employ would be to present their top high-profile athletes in a professional way to the NFL. For example, they would be able to show that they take on responsibility and that they handle themselves in a professional manner. I feel that this would take some pressure off any team that is interested in the player. Looking at it from the other side, Northwestern University can use this issue and their stance on it to help pave the way for other schools in preventing the unionization of their “student-athletes.” According to Henry Bienen, Northwestern University’s President Emeritus, is ok with completely eliminating their football program to maintain academics as being their priority. The article goes on to say that this situation could lead to what the Ivy League schools did back in the 1950’s when they dropped athletic scholarships.

As for how this issue relates to our sports marketing class, I believe that it will be a lingering issue for years to come and that it will be something that will cause controversy within private universities. With that being said, I think that later down the road we might see private institutions employ marketing strategies about being a part of a union that might appeal to potential recruits. There have even been talks that these ”athletes” might even receive a salary within the next couple of years. The last reason why I feel that this topic is relevant to class is because it may or may not hinder the schools chance to promote their football or other athletic team if they decide to eliminate the sport all together.

---

Analysis by Matthew Flint in SRM 435 (section 2)

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that the Northwestern college football players are employees of the university and have the right to form a union. The union is led by Kain Colter who played for Northwestern as their quarterback. The players on the football team can now bargain with their coaching staff and school, or employers, for more rights and benefits in regards to the basic rights that employees are granted through labor laws. With the players able to unionize, if enough teams pick up on the ability to unionize through private schools, then the situation could very well change the way the NCAA is handled with student athletes. The billions that the NCAA pulls in through college athletics could be split up a lot more if more and more players are considered employees and demand a higher salary and benefits. Northwestern stated that they would consider getting rid of their football program if the union actually came to fruition.

The situation about Northwestern is gaining a snowball effect with the media and how much coverage the topic is getting. A union could be a brand new selling point to colleges if they want to try to adapt the feature of athletes having more benefits and pay raises. Recruits from high school would probably much rather focus more on the sport they are interested in as well as look at the benefits of getting paid for what they love playing. The union could be a great selling standpoint because instead of a recruit going on to another school just with a scholarship, the union could offer the recruit much more.

I believe that the Northwestern unionization is relevant to this course because it has a chance to completely change the way that the NCAA is ran. If Northwestern decides to keep their football program due to the union, they could have an unfair advantage when looking for new recruits. Unions catching on to private schools could easily influence player’s decisions on whether they want to focus more on their academics or their college career. Marketing with the union would be very easy to appeal to younger athletes because they would look at the bigger picture with what is readily available to them to help them achieve their goals and help them in case they get injured.

"March Madness Ratings And Revenue Keep Reaching New Heights"

From Forbes.com

Analysis by Jacob Nicely in SRM 435 (section 2)

When you think of the most watched sporting events you may think of the Super Bowl, the World Series, the BCS national championship game, but what you may not realize is that the Men’s NCAA basketball tournament is right behind the BCS national championship game and a few NFL games. When March rolls around, people everywhere fill out their brackets and tune in to stay up to date with how their favorite teams are doing and to keep track of their bracket. In all of this the unthinkable always happens, a cinderella team out of nowhere beats a heavily favored team and makes a run in the tournament highlighting what we all know and love about “March Madness.” Everyday people watch these games from their television, their laptops and tablets, and their phones to try and keep track of their teams, their bracket, or just the overall madness of the tournament. As a result of the madness, more and more people are tuning in to the tournament creating a revenue machine that is raking in over a billion dollars every year.

In 2010, CBS and Turner inked a 14-year deal worth $11 million for the broadcasting rights to the Men’s NCAA tournament. In the regular season, it is extremely rare for a Men’s NCAA Basketball game to reach over 2 million viewers but during the tournament that number skyrockets to an average of 10.7 million viewers a game during the 2013 tournament. Only the Super Bowl, BCS national championship game, and a few NFL games drew in a larger audience than the men’s national championship game with 23.4 million viewers with fans taking in over 1.4 million hours of live streaming during the tournament. To achieve this goal, the two broadcasting companies have devised a scheduling plan that staggers game times and spreads them across 4 channels so that there are more games on television and so that as one game ends another game begins. This is something that marketers can only dream of.

In combination with the television format, there have been numerous mobile applications developed so that fans can live stream the games, get live scores, and keep up with their brackets. With numerous platforms to follow the tournament, it creates more and more places for companies to advertise and spend their money. This has led to companies spending a mind-boggling $1.15 billion on advertisements during the 2013 NCAA tournament and a number that is expected to increase for this year’s tournament. Along with advertising, the NCAA does a phenomenal job segmenting the rounds into their own separate sporting events that everyone can identify with such as the “Sweet 16”, the “Elite Eight”, and the “Final Four.” This creates many options for merchandising and licensing of apparel that many fans buy into every year creating another revenue stream for the NCAA and the schools involved.

All of these numbers are great and show how the NCAA and the broadcasting companies are creating a juggernaut of a sporting event but how do they get people to tune into games that may not normally watch? Well brackets are the answer. Every year fans can go online to various sites and fill out a bracket, where they can predict who will win what game. This creates not only a way to get more fans interested in more games they can watch, but also creates more platforms for advertisers to spend money. With the first-round games which are commonly referred to as “play-in games” reaching all-time high tv ratings, the tournament is only gaining interest year after year.

Turner-Sports and CBS, in combination with the NCAA, have created a fantastic formula from a marketing standpoint. Their TV scheduling and staggering of games encourages fans to watch more than one game, tune into games they may not normally watch, and have more coverage of games causing more people to cut on the television and watch the tournament. In combination with TV broadcasting, the live streaming and mobile applications allow people who normally could not tune in, the ability to watch the games from anywhere, even in school and at work when they are not supposed to. With all of these options to take in the games, the broadcasting companies and the NCAA have allowed themselves to offer diversification of advertising to companies. Now they can reach more target markets, more often, and in locations they normally would not be able to reach them at which is very important because consumers are more likely to buy a product when it is advertised to them when they are in the mindset. Just to give an example, an office supply company can now advertise on live streaming websites and mobile applications because people can tune into to watch the games from their work as opposed to television, which people who are at work cannot normally watch the day games. Also, with more channels and more games it allows for companies to advertise on specific channels to specific demographics based on locations of the teams which they would not have been able to do if only two games were being shown at a time instead of four.

All in all, this time of year can get everyone excited whether you will be rooting for the underdog, cheering on your favorite team, following your bracket closely, or just tuning in to see some great basketball games. The Men’s NCAA basketball tournament will only continue to rise in popularity thus showing that it will only rise in ad revenue as a result. As technology advances, broadcasting companies and the NCAA are keeping up and finding more and more ways to reach viewers every year. This is great news for companies who are looking to market their products and services because they can reach more demographics and specific target markets than they have in the past. From a marketing standpoint, they have created a phenomenal plan to get companies to spend their money as well as keeping up with current trends to keep the companies happy with their investments. As times change and technology develops, we can only sit back and see what the future tournaments will bring.

---

Analysis by Ben Eidle in SRM 435 (section 2)

Our article has to deal with CBS and Turner’s television package for the NCAA men’s basketball tournament. Last year was a big year for the tournament because it hit a nineteen year high for ratings. Last year’s championship game only trailed some NFL games and the BCS national championship game in viewers as well. When speaking about ratings in college basketball they jump a significant amount during the offseason. This has caught CBS-Turner’s attention and they walked away with a fourteen year television deal that runs through 2024. The tournament has been praised for the way they are showing their games as well. They have the times staggered so that you are able to watch the maximum amounts of basketball games and they are spread across four channels which makes it easy to flip back and forth between. Another thing that has brought in more viewers is the expansion of applications for mobile devices. People are now able to interact and watch in many more ways compared to being stuck to a television. Quicken Loans tried to take advantage of the tournament as well by sponsoring the billion dollar bracket challenge but was overshadowed by Warren Buffet who walked away with most of the attention with people ignoring their name on the contest. Ad space has been bringing in more revenue year after year as well. Last year it brought in $1.15 billion in television ad revenue and it is expected to increase this year as well. It has brought in more money than the NFL which is interesting. The last thing they mentioned in the article was that they are thinking of expanding the tournament by adding another round.

This article deals with marketing in multiple ways. The first thing that really stood out to me was the television ad revenue. It impressed me because of how large the number was. It was very unclear in the article what the figure was actually for because it could have been for other advertising as well but I found in another article that it was just for television alone. The ad revenue is larger than you think. It has gained more ad revenue compared to all of the professional sports leagues in the United States barely beating out the NFL.

I feel that the “First Four” is also a great marketing tactic. They have taken 4 games and created play-in games for the tournament. The NCAA has taken these games though and have called them the first round of the tournament and once the field of sixty-four is set that is now the second round. They have taken these games and have people thinking that they really are first round matchups which is great because it brings greater interest and kind of jumpstarts the tournament. This is great because at the beginning of the tournament the people are limited to the couple of games at the beginning of the week that they are able to watch instead of changing back and forth between multiple games once the “second round” begins.

Finally, the different ways that you can watch the games in the tournament is a great tactic by CBS-Turner. They have taken the games and spread them across four channels which gives one the option of changing between games in case one is bad compared to another. They also give one the opportunity to just keep going to the ending of each game because the games are staggered and don’t have the same start times. Also, for the final four the games will be broadcasted on three different channels. One will be a national broadcast of the game and the other two channels will have broadcasters for each of the two different schools that are playing in the game. And last but not least, they have continued to improve the online experience. The applications have been vastly improved over the years and this year has become more user friendly. One is also able to follow each team through the application and see what people are saying about each team.

Overall, I believe what CBS-Turner has done is great for the tournament. You give viewers the opportunity to catch the magic of the postseason without missing endings to each game. It has given great customer service as well because people have so many new ways in which they are able to follow the tournament instead of just watching the games on television or checking the scores on the internet. Finally, the television ad revenue is ridiculous and the fact that it is supposed to be more than last year’s tournament has to mean that they are doing something right.

"March Madness Twitter Ads Tip Off After Buzzer-Beater"

From Advertising Age

Analysis by Kelsey Holmes in KIN 501

With each new year of March Madness comes new sports marketing plans. The 3–Week long NCAA tournament is attracting businesses to put forth their very best social media marketing plans. All these companies have goals to be the most creative, wittiest, and fastest to tweet. The ad-revenue of March Madness continues to grow year by year and is steadily catching up to major events such as the Super Bowl. Marketers are debuting new ad campaigns and doing everything they can to get their name in the mix.

This year’s biggest trend will be “Real-Time” marketing. “From now through the NCAA's Final Four weekend in early April, brands will attempt to score marketing points after nail-biting games and general basketball-related social media activity.” While some efforts will be real-time reactions to game events others will be pre-planned. All types of brands; food, insurance, and even hotels are all buying in to get a piece of March Madness on Twitter.

There are 4 types of tweets taking place.
Real-Time: As soon as games end, brands are reacting with witty sayings and tweets to become part of the frenzy.

Prepared: Multiple tweets prepared before games and then used based on what’s happening

Promoted: Advertisement on users Timeline promoting a particular brand.

Intentionally Confusing: Tweets about sports and the brand but not necessarily basketball.

Using March Madness to advertise is a smart and efficient move for these companies. A major attractor is the variety of fans that watch march madness. March Madness attracts fans of all ages and sexes as well as the dedicated and leisure fan. Along with variety of fans come a variety of platforms. March Madness can be watched on television, the computer, tablets, and mobile devices. That means there are 4 channels on TV plus their websites and the March Madness website and mobile apps. This is extremely useful because consumers can be reached anywhere and multiple times a day.

This marketing strategy is extremely relevant and useful to this course. Real-Time marketing is an example of how marketers must evolve to stay relevant to the consumer. Companies must continue to adapt to “stay ahead of the game”. The importance of staying relevant is realer now than ever and the window to react is now slimmer than ever. Companies must now hire professionals specifically for Twitter. This person must be creative and witty and always have a pulse on their audience. Because of this need companies now have to rethink their hiring and the experience of their employees. Also, professionals looking for jobs will find it beneficial to have social media experience. Overall, I think that Real-Time marketing will become more common practice and expand outside of sporting events.

"March Madness evokes marketer madness"

From USA Today

Analaysis by Wyatt Johnson in SRM 435 (section 1) 

Our article talked about how big March Madness is and how it is a marketing mix that advertisers try to take advantage of. With the tournament being broadcasted on 4 different networks it gives companies an advantage to promote their products to potential consumers. March Madness is so big companies can reach different audiences through ads, giveaways, concerts, and rebranding hotels. I feel like this is a month that companies definitely look forward to because it’s a whole month of basketball and a whole month fans will see these ads multiple times throughout March. Companies are also using social media to engage fans as well. Companies like Burger King and Pizza Hut are using twitter to promote their special deals. I believe that March Madness is huge marketing mix for companies because they use all 4 phases of promotion which include advertising, publicity, personal contact, and incentives. All of these phases are essential to engaging fans and consumers. Companies are using different marketing strategies to get in touch with potential consumers even through cell phones. Some companies having different apps that people can download on their phones and that helps companies get various ways of promoting their message. This article is relative to the course because March Madness is one of the biggest events in sports and it helps companies display different ways of connecting March Madness with their product to help promote their message to potential consumers. Companies have to go through various marketing steps we talked about in order to be affective in sport promotion and sales.

---

Analysis by Lindsey Tomasz in SRM 435 (section 1)

USA Today's "March Madness Evokes Marketer's Madness" is a short yet great article that focuses on how those in the marketing industry use this three weeklong event to promote their products. It is obvious that although March Madness doesn't exactly have the "heft" of the SuperBowl or the worldwide scope of the Olympics, it certainly is becoming a marketer's dream come true. Over the past few years, this event has brought in more and more ad revenue - more than some professional sports leagues - and the young, desirable audience and the great world of social media are mostly to thank for that. Marketers are doing all they can to take advantage of this; debuting both new ads and apps, hosting concerts, giving away free food, and even rebranding some hotels, just to name a few.

I believe that companies using March Madness to advertise themselves and their products is an extremely smart move. Along with the young audience, the different games throughout the tournament are shown on multiple different channels, which gives marketers more room to work with. It gives them the opportunity to really get out there and spread the word around for what they are trying to sell. There about four stations that are televising games, which also means that there are at least four major websites that can be used for advertising as well. I know from first-hand experience in the past week, that if I miss a game that was on my bracket, I immediately go to the website to see what I missed. I think it is also a great idea to be using former basketball stars in the commercials. Using these stars keeps a relationship between the ad and what the viewer is actually watching it for, and probably holds the viewer's interest more than other, say "regular", people. Although people don't necessarily watch this tournament for the commercials in particular, like they do for the Super Bowl, I think it is still a safe bet to be spending the millions of dollars for that thirty second commercial as long as they keep that "ad to game" relationship going.

This marketing strategy is very relevant to our course because it is a prime example of obviously promotion and sales in the sport industry in relation to a widely social and growing event. To name a few, we are taught about sponsorships, advertising, licensing, different incentives, and what really makes a good sales person/company in a business. Reading about these March Madness marketers has really put a lot of these into perspective and allows me to better understand what all goes into selling a product or service. It has been very interesting for me to watch the games and commercials and be able to go more into depth about how the advertisement was created to better fit the sport and audience and maybe how the certain sponsors/ads fit back into the college basketball aspect. Connecting everything back to the consumers is huge and marketing in this tournament has proven to be all about that, which is why there is no “peak” to be seen at all in the near future of this and it will only become more popular in years to come.

"Marketers Going Mad This March Over NCAA Tournament"

From Athletic Business

Analysis by Kevin Albright in KIN 501

I came across a marketing article Athletic Business Journal that I found really interesting regarding the NCAA Tournament and how big of a stage it is for marketers around the country. The article starts off by saying that the NCAA Tournament is not quite as attractive to marketers as maybe the Super Bowl or the most recent Olympics, however it is pretty close and especially this year is gaining a lot of attention from marketers. The tournament consists of over 60 basketball games which are all broadcasted over four popular TV stations (TBS,CBS,TNT, TruTV). Games go on for nearly 3 weeks and attract many viewers outside of basketball fans because of the size of the event and the instructiveness of filling out a bracket and competing against others for the better bracket. The article talks about the tournament being a marketers dream because of the large coverage as well as the fact that it’s live sports, they describe it as “TiVo proof”.

Last year it was said that the tournament generated over 1 billion dollars in ad revenue and they anticipate exceeding that this year. The growth of social media has helped the marketing of brands also because for three weeks social media is buzzing about everything relating to the NCAA Tournament. Also companies are sponsoring apps, hotels, contests, hosting concerts and running promotions during this time to grab the attention of their views and promote their product. I see it as a great way to market because of the reasons the article mentioned dealing with it being a 3 week event, live TV, tons of social media opportunities and the size of the spectators.

This topic is very relevant to class because determining where you are going to use your marketing resources is one of the most crucial parts to a successful marketing program. I also thought that it would spark and interesting discussion on how valuable some marketing may be and what kind of price tag can you put on it. For example Warren Buffet is teaming up with Quicken Loans to offer 1 billion dollars to anyone who can get a perfect bracket. Quicken Loans is gaining so much publicity from this contest and they are willing to risk a lot of money if someone wins the contest. Now the odds are very slim that someone gets a perfect bracket but it was the decision they had to make as to how valuable is that as a marketing scheme. The importance of studying trends and analyzing numbers and statistics can be critical to devising a strong marketing plan.

"Notre Dame, Under Armour Ink Unprecedented $90M Deal"

From Athletic Business

Analysis by Sylvia Lee in SRM 435 (section 2)

Recently, Notre Dame and Under Armour signed the most lucrative apparel and shoe deal in college athletics history. The agreement is over a 10-year period worth about $90 million in cash and merchandise. Currently, Notre Dame has a deal with Adidas, which will be ending in June.

In addition to the $90 million deal, the agreement will also allow Notre Dame to take some of the cash in company stock, potentially making the payoff even greater. Because of this, “shares of Under Armour were up more than 3 percent on the day and 80 percent over the last year.”

Notre Dame fans are worried that Under Armour will change the traditional uniforms, but Kevin Plank (CEO of Under Armour) ensured the fans that they will not make any major tweaks. The deal also does not allow Under Armour to get any signage in the stadium. Since 1930, Notre Dame’s stadium has been free of all advertisements and does not have a video replay board, and they will continue on with this tradition.

From a sport-marketing standpoint, I believe this is a huge opportunity for Under Armour since they are continuing to compete with other sporting apparel companies such as Nike and Adidas. With every Notre Dame football game being nationally televised, Under Armour will get a great amount of exposure. Because of this new deal, die-hard Notre Dame fans, students and faculty of Notre Dame could possibly also to become loyal to this brand in a sense that it may make them feel a connection with the football players and program. With about a quarter of the United States population being a college football fan, there is no doubt that Under Armour has gained a tremendous amount of publicity after signing this $90 million deal with Notre Dame.

This article is related to this sport marketing and sales course because it is about the benefits a sports team and a company gained by signing a sponsorship deal. Under Armour will get a lot of national television exposure during college football season, and Notre Dame will be getting a total of $90 million in cash and merchandise.

---

Analysis by Titus Till in SRM 435 (section 2)

On Tuesday, January 21st, 2014, Under Armour and Notre Dame announced to the world their new deal, which is arguably one of the biggest contracts in college sports history between a University and another big name company such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok or Under Armour. Notre Dame’s previous deal with Adidas was the richest in college sports with the 10-year $82 million contract that will soon expire. Notre Dame’s new contract is now being referred to as one of the most valuable shoe and apparel contracts in the country. This 10-year deal will begin as soon as the contract with Adidas expires in June. The value of the deal was not revealed by Notre Dame or Under Armour, but is estimated to be worth a whopping $90 million over the next ten years according to ESPN reporters. Notre Dame will be joining a plethora of schools across the country who have a school-wide deals with Under Armour including company owner, Kevin Plank’s, alma mater Maryland, Texas Tech, Boston College, Utah, Temple, Northwestern, South Florida and South Carolina. For the fans that may have concerns with having changes made to the historical uniforms that Notre Dame has worn for years, Plank says not to worry. Also, Under Armour will not have any signage within Notre Dame Stadium in order to keep the traditional atmosphere, which excludes any advertisements and even a video replay board within the stadium.

This deal ultimately benefits both Under Armour and Notre Dame from a marketing standpoint because of the huge fan base that both Under Armour and Notre Dame have accumulated over the years. With these two entities joining forces, more awareness of both brands will grow. Not only does this create more buzz around the Notre Dame community but also will generate more cash through Under Armour’s company stock. As of 12:30 p.m. ET on the day that this deal was announced the shares for Under Armour went up more than 3 percent and up more than 80 percent over last year. I believe that this deal will generate more sales from Notre Dame fans wanting to be apart of the new change going forth. As this relates to our class, this is a perfect example of a successful deal for both parties involved. If all deals could sound this good on paper the world would be a better place but unfortunately not every company has a growing name like Under Armour and not every school has a tradition like Notre Dame. Whoever came up with this idea to merge this school and this company was a genius from a marketing standpoint.

"Georgia Tech May Auction Tickets to Clemson Game"

From Athletic Business

View from the Northwestern News Network

Analysis by Kristina Mohler in KIN 501

Georgia Tech University is looking into adapting a new ticketing approach that Northwestern University has found to be successful. This approach is a Dutch-auction style, modified from a Netherlands style of selling flowers. Northwestern University economics professors Jeff Ely and Sandeep Boliga pitched their customized version of this auction to the athletics department for their ticket sales.

In this case, Northwestern would tailor ticket prices according to demand and popularity and set them accordingly. As game days approached, ticket prices would drop until the section was sold out. However, differing from normal Dutch auctions, if you bought a ticket at a higher price than the final buyer, you would be refunded the difference in prices in the same section. This way, everyone in the same section pays the same price and no one feels cheated. For example, if tickets go on sale for $80.00 and you buy one right away, but the price drops to $65.00 right before the game, you would be refunded $15.00. A “price floor” would be set to never go below what season ticket holders pay. This method encourages fans to not wait to buy tickets, increases revenue, fills seats, and makes season tickets more appealing. The sooner you buy, the better seats you are guaranteed. Additionally, there is a chance that the ticket price will drop and you could receive a rebate. Season tickets may be more appealing because you avoid the chance of tickets selling out at a higher price, and you avoid the auction all together.

Some schools and professional teams have started using dynamic pricing systems. These two systems are similar that their ticket prices fluctuate according to demand. However, dynamic pricing can go up or down, increasing as demand increases or decreasing as demand decreases. Therefore, someone who buys the first ticket to a game or event will pay less than the person who buys the last ticket. The Dutch auction style will only decrease, never increase. Also, dynamic pricing locks the buyer in at the price they purchase at. Northwestern’s “Purple Pledge” allows for a refund if the price drops in their section after purchasing. Both styles encourage fans to buy tickets early.

Georgia Tech’s Bobby Dodd stadium holds 55,000. Adjusting ticket pricing to higher and lower demand games could help fill seats and increase revenue. Clemson will be the largest selling game of Georgia Tech’s 2014 season, but I bet hosting Georgia in 2015 could be an even greater revenue generator. In the article, it states that Georgia Tech struggles to break even financially and does not currently fully fund scholarships for its track, cross country, or swim programs. As long as Georgia Tech truly uses increased revenue for positive incentives such as scholarship funding, I think this is a great method that could be adapted across the board.

One of my favorite parts about this is how it potentially cuts out the “second market” (StubHub, Craigslist, etc.). Some have also proposed the idea of venues having a buyback option of which they can resell for profit, instead of having a final sales policy which causes buyers to resell their tickets on such second market venues. This could be lost revenue for the original venue, especially for sold out events. To me, it makes the most sense to offer a full refund for tickets that they could then resell, especially for high-demand or sold out events. I understand how not having a buyback system avoids sales loss for events that do not sell out however. Most second markets charge a fee of their own, so fans do not receive their full money back, and new buyers usually overpay (unless tickets are marked way down). A venue buyback could potentially be a win-win for themselves and buyers, and could help eliminate second markets and perhaps some scalping. I tried selling tickets on StubHub, and it was going to be impossible for me to get my money back. The demand for the game had decreased since I bought the tickets, and I would have had to post them for more than I bought them for in order to end up with my money back after StubHub got their percentage of the sale.

The article states that Northwestern did not offer sales figures to Georgia Tech, but said that the auctions had been successful. I am interested to see final numbers for both schools for both the higher demand games and the lower demand games.

"Reseating Plan Blamed for Low WVU Hoops Attendance"

From Athletic Business

Analysis by Kevin Albright in KIN 501

The article that I came across was in the Athletic Business Journal and it deals with a reseating plan at West Virginia University basketball games. More specifically sources think that this reseating plan has lead to lower attendances for this season’s games. Season ticket holders seats were taken from them and the new reseating plan gave the better seats to those who were larger donors to the program. The first game of the season there was a good attendance but since then the average is nearly half of that first game. The author then goes on to examine if this reseating plan truly is harming the attendance. Although the number of season ticket renewals went down they do not think it is a result of the reseating plan because their donations increased and more money was raised from season ticket holders this year compared to last. He explains that last year the Mountaineers didn’t perform that well and this year is a rebuild year which is why attendance may be lacking. The author feels that the attendance numbers are down because the students are not coming out to support their team and he feels this is an area of concern across the country.

Attendance to sporting events is a huge focus of sport marketing and I think it is often tough to tell why or why not fans may be attending games. There are a lot of different factors that may affect attendance as you can see with this article. The issue that I would like to focus on is the lack of student support. I agree with the author that a lot of schools are suffering from minimal student support and it takes away from the college basketball atmosphere. Based on my experiences the students tend to be the most boisterous fans and they can have an impact on the game and create that home court advantage. Being at JMU I have seen great crowds for a college game and I have also seen poor crowds for a college game and in my opinion a lot of it has to do with the students. I understand that season ticket holders bring in the money which is a primary focus, I feel that to create that ideal atmosphere you need a good group of student fans. For example, Duke has the Cameron Crazies which is the name they give their student fans who show up regularly and camp out for tickets, stand the whole game, paint their faces, and are extremely loud. Duke is a program with a rich basketball history and has a habit of being very competitive so that may make it easier for student fans to rally behind the team.

I found this article interesting because like the author said, every school seems to be losing student fans and the sports marketing departments can help to recruit those fans back to games. I believe that seating does have an impact on the amount of fans that come weather they are season ticket holders or students. The better your seat is or the closer you are to the court the more you feel involved in the game which is the experience fans want to have. Obviously not everyone can have the best seats but I would be interested to see in venues around the country what seems to be the most beneficial seating arrangement for fans to maximize attendance.

"Banking on Booze"

From Athletic Management

Review by Josh Hogan in SRM 435 (section 2)

Why is alcohol not sold at all college sporting events is a question that is asked by so many people and quite frankly myself as well. There is bias in my reasoning because I am a college student, but I do see a merit to this action being taken by a university. Recently the University of Toledo permitted alcohol to be sold at its football and basketball games to the public, not just luxury suites. They are doing this not only for money and sponsorship deals, but also to enhance what Mike O’Brien, athletic director, says is the “game day experience”. They have seen the merit like 22 other NCAA schools in selling alcohol. Of course the proper implications will be in use such as security, id verification, and same game day rules in general for public.

The tailgating experience is one that many people come to football games for, but sometimes abuse this. Fans know that alcohol can’t be purchased inside the stadium and may just try to abuse alcohol as much as possible before the game, then may not even go to event itself. Toledo has recognized this and many other schools are starting to see this too. You want to retain spectators at events not only for the teams support, but the longer they are at event, the higher the percentage they will spend money there. The sales of alcohol could really be a strong benefit to keep the fan at a game and for revenue of selling of alcohol. With big name sponsors coming in such as Budweiser, Coors, etc., I see the potential for bigger prizes for fans. Entertainment could increase, maybe post game shows, or fireworks can become a common theme. JMU I believe is a school that can and needs to move in this direction for the same exact reasons. With an expanding campus, high level of competition for the university, and yes the “party” tagged word for our school. I believe that JMU students wouldn’t abuse alcohol as much in tailgates because they know they can get a beer for the game. I hear it to many times from fellow students that they just want to just leave at halftime because they want to go party. It comes in unison for the home team to also be good so the fan can enjoy the game. I’m afraid that the JMU community is just afraid to take this step, but with the right message being sent to them, I believe they would shift their views.

---

Review by Tucker Koch in SRM 435 (section 2)

The article we used for our presentation focused on the idea of the University of Toledo selling alcohol at their football and basketball games. This makes them the 23rd school across the country to do so and it has been a highly controversial decision in almost every case. Toledo will add extra security to games and looks to copy the success of other schools who have seen decreased arrests on game days since allowing the sale of alcohol. Communities tend to be hesitant but schools are extremely optimistic about the possible added revenue. In some cases, like West Virginia University, revenue from alcohol sales at games can exceed one million dollars.

This relates to our class because the whole idea of selling alcohol is in essence a sales promotion to get more people to come to games. Changing the culture of a football stadium is not easy to do at any level, but especially Division I college football. Other than free t-shirts, a good halftime show or a rival opponent, it is extremely difficult to entice fans to give up a Saturday to watch a struggling team. That’s why in the current state, it seems the emphasis to the students is put on the tailgate and not the game itself. The amount of students who tailgate but don’t go into the games at JMU seems to increase every year. In the case of JMU, selling alcohol at the games might entice more people to go to the game, stay past halftime and thus increase the game day experience and atmosphere. With an increased fan presence maybe the team will start playing better at home and then the program becomes one that students and athletes love being a part of.

"Florida Gulf Coast Still Benefitting from Sweet 16 Run"

From Athletic Business

Review by Shane Eachus in KIN 501

There are a number of sports marketing objectives that are a constant focus for collegiate athletics departments. The most prominent objective in major college athletics marketing often times is to grow the athletics brand and to increase notoriety for the university. The 2013 NCAA men’s basketball tournament saw a #15 seed, Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU), advance to the sweet 16 round of the tournament for the first time in tournament history; FGCU became a social media marvel and a Cinderella story for the ages thanks to their rise from obscurity via high flying basketball and a social media explosion. Following an opening round upset of perennial power and #2 seed, Georgetown University, and in particular following a series of highlight reel dunks and alley oops, a twitter account posted a message stating that previously unknown Florida Gulf Coast University must be located in “Dunk City, Florida.” The nickname “Dunk City” quickly caught on and FGCU became characterized by both their style of play and their carefree fun loving attitude, both of which were pointed to in the newly acquired nickname and marketing campaign. Less than 5 hours after the Georgetown game had ended, a music video had been created that would soon go viral referring to FGCU’s basketball team, affectionately referring to the team as Dunk City. Following the game and the popularity explosion of the video, dunk city tee shirts were made, dunk city video packages were produced by CBS and ESPN was featuring the program on SportsCenter.

To date, FGCU athletics is still utilizing the “Dunk City” moniker. Every copy of the 2013-2014 season media guide possesses a QR code that can be scanned by iPhone and android devices, bringing about a mobile highlight tape consisting of every dunk from the previous year and a half of FGCU basketball. Fans at the institution, as well as in surrounding southwest Florida, have jumped on board with the FGCU, which opened only 17 years ago. A constant objective of sports marketing is to grow the fan base, or increase the number of individuals who recognize and identify with a particular team. Through a number of statistics, including a 415% rise in merchandise sales, and a 154% increase in season ticket sales, we can see that these types of behaviors have certainly grown at FGCU. The primary end result of the dunk city marketing campaign was described as “transformational” by FGCU athletics director Kevin Kavanagh; notoriety for the less than 20 year old university has truly spiked following the dunk city campaign during the 2013 NCAA tournament. One professor who was spending time over the 2013 summer in China reported being approached on the street as a response to his FGCU apparel with only the words “dunk city” being exclaimed at him; university officials even go as far as to praise the 2013 NCAA tournament success and exposure as being the primary reason for the schools admissions application hike (a 35% increase in applications for undergraduate enrollment from 2013-2014).

In the context of sports marketing the athletics department at Florida Gulf Coast University struck gold via another individual’s social media post; without the tweet referring to “Dunk City, Florida” the school’s successful marketing of the basketball program may have never taken off. However, the athletics department displayed a brilliant strategy of building off of a team’s success to produce a monumentally successful advertising campaign. Dunk city was clearly a monumentally successful sports marketing campaign in that it helped to increase the fan base and increase fan behavior/activity. More so, the dunk city marketing campaign extended beyond sports, the sports marketing campaign extended into the institutional realm helping to improve the national and international face of an entire fledgling university. Dunk City has become the brand of FGCU basketball, thanks to the University’s acceptance and promotion of the ad campaign. The catchy and proper fitting nickname helped bring about massive positive changes; in this instance, the relevance and popularity of the nickname or moniker simply made the ad campaign.

"Inside Under Armour's 'Game-Changing' Notre Dame Deal"

From Athletic Business

Review by Rosella Sheehan in KIN 501
In January 2014, Notre Dame Athletics and Under Armour signed a deal that would make Under Armour the official outfitter of all twenty-six varsity sports at Notre Dame, over the next ten years. The deal is reportedly between $90 and $100 million dollars and is unique because it offers Notre Dame the opportunity to take some of the money in Under Armour stock. This deal is the largest sponsorship agreement ever by a university and it has been predicted that as a result of this sponsorship agreement, the Under Armour brand will increase in popularity. The contract with Under Armour begins July 1st, once the contract with Adidas expires (Allen, 2014).

From a sports marketing standpoint, the deal between Under Armour and Notre Dame is a good opportunity for Under Armour to grow as a brand. By placing the Under Armour brand on the uniforms of a nationally recognized university, the budding sports clothing and equipment company will reach a level of popularity only recently seen by brands such as Nike and Adidas.

Notre Dame leaving Adidas and signing with Under Armour may be a sign that brands such as Adidas are no longer the brands that universities and teams want to be wearing. Teams are always looking for the best brand that will help them generate success on the field and with Under Armour continuing to produce new technology for their products; they seem to be a brand that will place a team one step ahead of their competition. Finally, when looking at marketing campaigns for Under Armour, their main focus is on the effect the products will have on an athlete’s performance, whereas Nike and Adidas seem to focus largely on the products themselves or which athletes are wearing their brand. This is important to note because Jack Swarbrick, the Notre Dame Athletic Director, hopes that his student-athletes will become “guinea pigs” for new technology being released by Under Armour. 

 This article is relevant to this course because it is a prime example that in the business of college and professional sports, many times there is no brand loyalty for a team or program. As seen when Notre Dame signed a deal with Under Armour after being with Adidas since 1997 (Allen, 2014). Money seems to always be one of the most important factors when teams are looking for potential sponsors. As sport and recreation professionals, when we are given the opportunity to look for and make a deal with a sponsor, it is important that the deal is best for an organization’s current needs and does not only focus on what has been done in the past. Also, when looking for a particular brand or sponsor to work with, it is important that both sides benefit from the deal.

"IMG's First Year with WVU Rights Exceeds Goals"

From Athletic Business

Review by Dustin Taylor in SRM 435 (section 1)

West Virginia University closed on a big marketing deal this past July. They put out a bid opportunity for marketing firms, and ended up closing a deal with IMG College on a 12 year $86.5 million agreement. This deal gave all of the universities’ athletic programs marketing right to IMG, and they paid WVU the money. West Virginia hopes for the deal are that exposure and sales for games will significantly increase due to the hard work of IMG. IMG has hopes that the money they make from marketing WVU’s athletics through 2025 will well cover the initial expense of $86.5 million that they paid for the rights.

IMG had some issues when first trying to close the deal with WVU for their marketing rights. The original agreement was worth $110 million, but some problems arose about who had rights to broadcast the games. Therefore, the ending deal ended up not getting done until late July. This posed a huge problem as it shortcut IMG’s marketing group time to work on their plans for the upcoming college football season. The group put together a hardworking team, and dove in head first regardless and ended up having some great results.

The IMG group decided to work with the long time voice of the Mountaineer’s radio broadcast, Tony Caridi, to keep him on the radio as part of their team. This was a huge step since he was so well known, and people liked him. The next gigantic step to improving, and bringing in money was the signing of sponsor UPS. IMG put together a few ads for the football team before the 2013 season to try to get some of the players, and mainly the school in general some major attention now that it has joined the BIG 12 conference. Even with the late start IMG was able to exceed their goals by 22-25% at the conclusion of the football season, also overcoming the team having a poor record. IMG has big plans in the future as they will continue to work, and having a full season to prepare should prove to be very beneficial. IMG also plans to utilize more web-based functions to enhance their marketing of WVU athletics in the coming years.

---

Review by Zach Lantz in SRM 435 (section 1)

In 2013, International Management Group AKA “IMG” took over management rights of the University of West Virginia’s multimedia rights. IMG has agreed to pay West Virginia 86.5 million dollars over the next 12 years to manage these multimedia rights. In this article, “IMG’s First Year with WVU Rights Exceeds Goals,” it explains how well and why IMG has succeeded their first year of their contract, despite getting off to a late start. IMG had not started until July of 2013 and still by mid December they were projected to make 22-25% of what they had originally anticipated. After taking over, IMG extended the pre-game show from 1 hour to 3 and a-half hours and extended the post-game show from 30 minutes to 2 hours. IMG has made it known that one of their top priorities is to bring in national companies to sponsor the school. While they have already brought UPS aboard, they are in talks with other companies to sponsor WVU. This article does a great job explaining how IMG became a part of WVU, why they chose WVU and how IMG brought on the adversity of becoming the rights owner of WVU’s multimedia in July before the beginning of the football season.

Many universities today hurt for sponsors for their athletic programs. By choosing IMG, WVU has made a tremendous step in promoting their athletic program. WVU’s athletic director, Oliver Luck, explained that the university chose IMG because they needed a bigger multimedia and sponsorships after joining the Big 12. IMG represents more than 90 universities and also the NCAA. While paying WVU over 80 million to hold the rights to their multimedia, IMG’s contract calls for WVU to invest over 2 million dollars in improvements at sports facilities that can be used for marketing. This does not only help IMG market their school, it also helps bring better facilities to West Virginia University.

This article relates to SRM 435 in many different ways. One of the biggest ways it relates to SRM 435 is the marketing and the promotional tools West Virginia and IMG are using to market WVU. IMG will be marketing WVU by creating deals with national companies for sponsorships, they will be advertising through social media and they will also be creating a brand for the fans of West Virginia by creating an environment that keeps these fans coming back. By having taking over, IMG is using all of the tools that we learn during this course and more.

"Notre Dame Announces $400M Stadium Expansion"

From Athletic Business

Campus Crossroads Project - Official Trailer from VideoND on Vimeo.

Review by Nick Merullo in SRM 435 (section 1)

Recently, the University of Notre Dame has announced their intentions to renovate and expand the historic Notre Dame Stadium at a cost of 400 million dollars. With a plan that current University president Rev. John Jenkins has called, “the most ambitious building project in the 172-year history of Notre Dame,” the school will be adding three to four thousand seats of “premium” seating, as well as adding three buildings to the stadium which will be centered on academics.

The expansion will feature building on the east, west and south sides of the stadium. On the west side the University plans to build an nine story, interactive student center. The new student center will also be used for campus recreation. Because of this, the old recreation facility will be transformed to a practice facility focused solely on the school’s men and women’s basketball teams in a separate project. This will allow the current press box will be torn down and placed on the east side of the stadium where it will be given a more lucrative and modern look. The new east side building will also be nine stories high, and will become the new home to the University’s anthropology and psychology departments, as well as featuring a new digital media center. A final building will be added to the south side of the stadium which will be used for hospitality purposes.

Notre Dame has yet to identify where exactly the funding will come from and hopes to begin construction next year. Jenkins has also said that the project should take nearly three years to finish. To add some perspective as to just how large the expansion will be, the article stated that Baylor University’s entirely new football stadium will cost the school 250 million dollars.

Although the brand of Notre Dame Football has consistently sold itself over the years due to its historic prestige, the school’s Athletic Director Jack Swarbick is excited about the new project. "It's such a powerful symbol given what's going on in college athletics right now, that you can take the stadium and say we believe in the integration of athletics into academics, and here's the living proof of it.” The current Notre Dame Stadium had been used solely for football purposes. With the expansion, the University will be able to market the facility from a standpoint of not just football, but also student life and academics. In an age where so much of the game day experience is based on incentives other than just the game itself, this will make the new facility unique in creating value of the stadium for today’s generation.

At the same time, the project must also take into consideration the opinions of the many football purists within the Notre Dame fan base. Because of this, the decision to refrain from any building on the stadium’s north side is key. This will prevent any obstruction of the famed mural of “Touchdown Jesus” which has long been known as a symbol of the tradition of Fighting Irish football. Although no decision has been made as to whether the playing surface will transition from natural grass to synthetic field turf, the school does intend to avoid placing any commercial advertising on its new interactive video screen scoreboard. And by combining the wants and needs of both the football purists and today’s generation of sports fans, Notre Dame may have the pieces in place for a premiere football facility.

---

Review by Luke Drayer in SRM 435 (section 1)

The University of Notre Dame’s 84 year-old stadium is getting a facelift; a $400 million dollar one. The plan to expand was released this past Wednesday by the University’s President, Rev. John Jenkins. According to Jenkins, this expansion is “the most ambitious building project in the 172-year history of Notre Dame.”

Adding between 3,000 to 4,000 premium seats plus three academic buildings on the east, west, and south wings, the stadium will now serve more than just student athletes and their fans. Two new nine story buildings will be attached to the east and west wings, the west side housing the new Student Center which includes a Rec Center and the east side becoming the new home of the anthropology and psychology departments as well as a digital media center. On the south side there will be a six-story hospitality area. "What's exciting about this project is it brings together athletics, faculty and academics, research and a student center, so it's an integrated model," Jenkins said. Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick is another proponent for this change. “It's such a powerful symbol given what's going on in college athletics right now, that you can take the stadium and say we believe in the integration of athletics into academics, and here's the living proof of it," Swarbrick said.

The integration of athletics and academics that Notre Dame is doing is really first of its kind in major college athletic programs and universities. However, by marketing it as such, it is drawing a much broader and larger crowd. Now, not just athletes and the fans will be using the stadium and its surrounding facilities, but everyday students as well. Instead of dumping millions of dollars into a facility that is used “six Saturdays a year” as stated in our video, it is now appealing to a much larger body. The integration of athletics and academics in one massive facility creates value beyond just the game day experience; it also provides a higher sense of school pride and less segregation between regular student and student-athletes.

While much of the expansion is targeting towards the younger generation of students, athletes, and fans, the University still understands its roots. Many of the Notre Dame ‘Purists’ don’t want to see their Touchdown Jesus, a long time good luck symbol for the Fighting Irish, taken down or covered up by the expansion. To see that all parties are pleased, the school has decided not to build anything on the north end of the field. Another concern of the older generation is that of having too much commercial advertising on the new scoreboard, which the school has agreed not to have.

The idea of marketing this new stadium as a multi-purpose facility that integrates both athletics and academics is brilliant and one that I think will start a trend amongst other major universities across the country. While upgrading the facility, not only are they improving the image of the football program, but also that of the university and their value on both the academic and athletic side. The school is promoting themselves as one that is well rounded and doing so with its football program at the forefront; the epitome of sports marketing.

"Louisville lacrosse coach accused of abusive tactics"

From NJ.com and USA Today

Analysis by Alexis Cross in SRM 334 (section 1)

In today’s NCAA athletic arena it seems as though emotions are a key component in any athlete and coach. For example, Louisville University’s women’s lacrosse team faced various emotional hurdles this fall with the suspension of head coach Kellie Young. Young is a former 2003 James Madison University women’s lacrosse coach. While at JMU she led the team to three NCAA appearances. Unfortunately, head coach is now under investigation for complaints of abusive tactics from 6 former and previous Louisville lacrosse players. It is believed that head coach Young had just crossed the line. There were a few examples in the various articles, for example one being, coach had made a player with a torn ACL do 250 push-ups as punishment in an airport terminal.

Lacrosse is a fast growing sport and really doesn’t get the media coverage it deserves. However, in this case Louisville is getting almost too much coverage. The team, coaching staff and the school are all under investigation. It is just unfortunate that the coverage the media is providing is apparently exaggerating the information. I have a friend on the team and she stated “I feel so bad for my coach, they’re exaggerating everything, it is just awful here.” As outsiders prospective, it is hard to really know what to believe about this case. Does the head coach have her team brain- washed in other words, thinking that her coaching style is ok and normal? Or is the media just amplifying the information.

As a player, I could not imagine what the team is going through right now. It is my understanding that they did still compete this fall in tournaments under the assistant coaches. But the amount of stress this now adds to the team. It will be interesting to see how the case plays out and will the team overcome this adversity to compete they want to this spring.

Relating this topic to class, the media is inevitably changing the world of sports and how fast stories can get out. Also the fact that media is now so dominant in athletics, as a society we are so wrapped up in sports. The media has to keep up with how interested people are in knowing what is going on in the professional, college and maybe even high school sports. On the other hand, this scandal has showed me if I was ever interested in working in athletics how important being prepared and relationships are. Being prepared to handle any situations that are thrown at us in the athletic department. And the fact that continuing to develop relationships every day cannot only but help you when things like this come up. As a University you get through it together.

---

Analysis by Jonathan Barden in SRM 334 (section 1)

The article I focused on was found on usatoday.com written by Adam Himmelsbach and was titled “Louisville lacrosse coach accused of abusive tactics”. The article took little time getting into the meat of the matter and dishing out the gossip a lot of readers would want to read about. After a short introduction the article swiftly moved into bullet pointing some of the worst offenses the coach had been accused of handing out to her players. The head coach, Kellie Young was allowed a few lines to defend herself in which she explained not all of these actions were 100% correct and then the article continued in a rather negative light, explaining more disturbing stories and action, or lack of action taken by the school to combat her behavior.

Analyzing this article from a media standpoint I would say that this article was rather one sided and definitely gave coach Young a bad name if you were to simply read this piece alone. The attempt to create a well-balanced article by throwing in the odd quote from Kellie Young did not really help her case as the next point immediately put her back down again by using rumored stories from disgruntled ex-players. From researching this story in depth a lot of other current players strongly stand by the coach and claim a lot of this information has been blown out of proportion or completely fabricated, but these point of views were unsurprisingly not included.

Despite this I would still say the article was a well written and well-researched piece. It definitely went in depth to the story, had numerous sources close to the camp and was able to use quotes from named players and parents to back up points made. In addition to this the author had clearly researched the topic well and had a good understanding of what was happening in the story, from disgruntled parents to the roles the athletic director and athletic administrator in attempting to control the situation.

I believe this article is extremely relevant to our course as it clearly shows how to write and lay out a news story to grab the reader’s attention. The title of “Louisville lacrosse coach accused of abusive tactics” immediately draws the reader in as it tells you there is going to be drama in the story happening as a very well respected sports program. And sports fans love nothing more than a drama filled sports story. Then after a brief introduction and laying out of the story it immediately gets into the key gossip filled points that most readers probably read the article for. This is an important tactic used for this type of writing as the reader is now hooked into the story and you can start to detail in more detail and more specifically what actually happened. Additionally the use of quotes not only adds more reliable information to the story but also helps break up the monotony sometimes found in articles that drag on without switching pace at all. The use of the “Story Highlights” section down the left hand column also helps to break up the story and is another effective tactic to entice the reader to read on. All of these tactics could be taken on board by members of our class to improve the standard of our sports writing in the future.

"No bowl ban for Miami Hurricanes"

From ESPN.com

Analysis by Alyssa Hough in SRM 334 (section 1)

Our media topic dealt with the NCAA finally making a decision on the University of Miami Nevin Shapero scandal. In November, 2009, Miami notified the NCAA about their investigation of one of their boosters, Nevin Shapero. They were investigating because he was throwing parties for athletes, taking them to strip clubs, buying them several things including food, clothes, and hotels for family and girlfriends, and other things. The media released information about this investigation once it came out in 2009, but very little information was disseminated after that until now. This is because the NCAA has finally made a decision as to what the punishment will be for the University of Miami. 

The NCAA decided to not ban the Miami Hurricanes from any bowl games, but has decided to take away some scholarships for football and basketball. They are taking away three scholarships from football and one from basketball each year for the next three years. This will total to nine scholarships lost in the football program and three in basketball. The NCAA weighed heavily the fact that The University of Miami decided to self-impose penalties while the investigation was going on when making their final decision. Miami put a two year bowl ban on themselves, and limited the number of scholarships they were giving out while this situation was being investigated.

It was interesting how the media released information about the case when it first came out in 2009, but then it faded away until now when the NCAA finally made a decision. I think the media stayed out of the issue because The University of Miami did a great job with their crisis management plan, and took control of the situation from the beginning. They self-imposed what could seem to be harsh punishments on themselves during the investigation to show how they are taking this seriously. There has been a lot of negative talk on social media sites like twitter saying that they think the NCAA let Miami off too easily for what they did. Schools like USC are making their disapproval with the decision known because they were hit hard with punishments from the NCAA in 2010. One thing that happened to USC is that they had 30 scholarships taken away from them while Miami only lost a total of 12. There has been a lot of talk about how the NCAA slapped Miami on the wrist and did not decide on a harsh enough punishment. However, the NCAA defends their decision by stating that they took into consideration their compliance and self-imposed punishments during the investigation.

Like we learned in class, you have to have a good crisis management plan in place because you never know when something unexpected is going to come about. Miami did a great job in managing this scandal, and because of that was rewarded with a lighter punishment from the NCAA. I think this will be something that other schools start to implement into their crisis management plan because it makes the school look good for owning what happened and dealing with it immediately. Even on Miami's website they have a link labeled NCAA Investigation. Under this link you can stay up to date with the investigation and the process of it. By including that on their site I believe they used the media to their benefit. Miami did a great job making sure they controlled the situation so the media could not bury the school in the scandal.

---

Analysis by Ben Eidle in SRM 334 (section 1)

Nevin Shapiro is a former booster of the University of Miami. He is no longer a booster because he was violating NCAA rules by providing special benefits to athletes in multiple sports. Shapiro gave athletes access to his yacht and he also paid for certain things that athletes wanted. The investigation by the NCAA began in 2009 and all of a sudden the case resurfaced this past week when the NCAA released their punishment for the University.

This case has a lot to do with crisis management and how it was handled by the University of Miami. The reason for this is because during the investigation stage the story was not talked about much on many media sources compared to other scandals at other similar institutions. There are many reasons that the media could have been ignoring this story that was going on for over two years.

The first thing that I can think of for the media talking about the story for a short period of time is because these types of cases come out about schools a decent amount of time. Improper benefits are given out at schools and they end up being caught. Even though this case was an extreme of improper benefits because they were given out over an eight year period they were still the benefits which may have caused the media not to care.

The next thing that I believe kept the media away from this story is because of the way the university handled the situation internally. The university properly reported what had occurred to the NCAA and continued with their own investigation into the subject matter. They then quickly placed self-imposed sanctions on themselves. These sanctions they put on themselves were unique because they were the harshest self-imposed sanctions a school has given to date. With the postseason bans for football and the reduction of scholarships the media reported this and then it died. I believe this occurred because I feel like the media had the idea that the sanctions were so significant that they did not feel a lot more was going to happen. The crisis management team made proper choices when dealing with the sanctions but they also made sure that they were saying the proper things when necessary. The university was making sure that they were keeping the public updated on what was going on with the case. This takes away from the necessity of the media because if a story is being reported from the main source then it is unnecessary to have the media report on it.

Another thought about the sanctions that the NCAA handed out has to do with the media as well. Usually when a story is being followed a person notices that the penalties are very large. The media was not covering this story as much as others have been. Even though this may not be true the NCAA may be influence by the media because the attention each individual case is given. For example, when USC was receiving their sanctions from the NCAA for the Reggie Bush problem they were being covered all of the time. The sanctions for USC turned out to be some of the worst sanctions given out to a school. The NCAA may have seen that this case was being covered heavily and that may have pressured them into showing everybody they are a strong governing body and over penalized the school. Since Miami was not being covered as much there was no pressure in giving out sanctions that were very large.

Since the NCAA released their sanctions the media has been debating whether or not that the penalties given out were bad enough. This hot topic is important because there are schools that have done less and received more. Also, there are people that believe because Miami put such strict sanctions on their own the NCAA lightened up on the penalties that they were going to give. The debate with the media has grown tremendously since it was first discussed. It has been a topic on social media recently with many different people voicing their opinions from newspaper columnists to fans. All of this shows how powerful the media can be when presenting certain topics.