From The Seattle Times
Analysis by Danielle Poplawski in SRM 435 (section 2)
On September 15, 2013, the Seattle Seahawks set the Guinness World Record for the “loudest crowd roar at a sports stadium” at CenturyLink Field. The Seahawks were playing their rivals, the San Francisco 49ers. This record-setting event was organized by the group Volume 12 and was not directly related to the Seattle Seahawks organization.
Seahawks fans pride themselves as being the loudest in the NFL. The crowd at the stadium is known as the 12th Man. Volume 12 is a group specifically for those who consider themselves to be a part of the 12th Man fan base for the Seahawks.
In July, Volume 12 announced that they would attempt to set the world record. To excite fans, the group held a tailgate outside of the stadium. The previous record of 131.76 decibels took place at Turk Telekom Arena in Istanbul on March 18, 2005 during a soccer match. Seattle’s CenturyLife Field broke this record twice in the same game. The first time in the first quarter with a level of 131.9 decibels while the second time took place in the third quarter with a level of 136.6 decibels.
To market the event, Volume 12 sent information, such as news releases, out to the media. In addition to this, they also made a YouTube video and posted on their various social media pages including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Pinterest. The week before the game, Sunday Night Football discussed the record-setting event and just how loud they thought it would be. The Seattle Seahawks have added the world record to their 12th Man page on the official website.
Holding the Guinness World Record for the loudest stadium will likely bring in some spectators who wish to see what all of the hype is about. Because of the 12th Man pride in Seattle, it also gives fans another commonality; thus uniting them more and providing the fans with more motivation to attend games rather than watch them on television. In a sense, a large part of the Seahawks game-day experience is the crowd, which requires a person to attend the game at CenturyLink Field.
The media attention gained from this event also brought attention to the Seahawks and their 12th Man. It is free publicity for the team. While discussing the world record, media outlets are also likely to discuss things such as the team’s record and other information. Volume 12 has also been able to gain from this event. The attention from media outlets has helped to spread their name and who they are. I believe that the Seahawks organization made a good decision in not being directly a part of the record-setting event. First, they were able to save time and money on promotions. Volume 12 took care of this all themselves and the Seahawks were still gaining attention. Secondly, by not becoming involved, it was less likely for the NFL to be able to intervene and cancel the event for any reason. Finally, by not putting their name on the event, the Seahawks organization can boast of the accomplishment that took place in their stadium without having to directly answer to any backlash.
---
Analysis by Eric Brent in SRM 435 (section 2)
In the Seattle Times article “Hawks fans ready for record roar,” the author discusses the fans of the Seattle attempting to set the record of the loudest crowd at a sports stadium. This was set to take place on September 15, 2013 at the Seahawk’s home opener against the San Francisco 49ers. All of the planning and execution was put on by Volume 12, which is a direct link to Seattle’s “12th Man” fan base. Joe Tafoya, co-founder of Volume 12, sent in an application without thinking too much of it, but a week and a half later to his surprise Guinness World Records was on board. Even with having knowledge of the approval the Seattle Seahawks organization itself continued to keep its distance from the event. No marketing or promotion of any kind was put on or linked to the organization.
At a time where it is difficult to get fans to come to experience a game at the stadium rather than sitting at home watching from their television, the Volume 12 found a way. Once Volume 12 found out Guinness World Records was on board, advertisements were placed on the Volume 12 social media sites (i.e. Facebook, Twitter), news releases were completed, YouTube videos were made, and NBC Sunday Night Football even mentioned the plan a week prior to the Seahawks Sunday Night Football game. The game not only sold out, but Seattle had its largest crowd ever a record breaking 68,338. This is the first time I have seen a marketing strategy involving fans setting a Guinness World Record, and it gave each person the opportunity to be a part of history. Not too many people can say they have been a part of breaking a world record.
This relates to the course due to the fact of all the conversation and discussion about how can we get people to the games and stay at the games and what are some unique ways to market a game. The opportunity to set a record caused the Seahawks to break another record that was not even being promoted, which was having the largest crowd attendance in Seattle Seahawks history. The reason I say it got people to stay at the game is because after the record was broken earlier in the game, it was not until the third quarter where the Seahawks fans set the highest mark of 136.6 decibels. From a marketing standpoint everyone involved indirectly or directly received great exposure. Seahawk’s organization probably benefited the most indirectly due to it being at their stadium and their team but having nothing to do with the planning. Volume 12 benefited the most directly because all of the planning and organizing was through that organization. NBC’s Sunday Night Football and Guinness World Records also received some good marketing because the game was held on NBC and Guinness was the reason Seahawk’s fans had this opportunity.
From Athletic Management
Analysis by Alyssa Truesdale in SRM 435 (section 1)
The article, More Fun for Fans, by Mary Kate Murphy (Athletic Management, 2013), looks at the reasons why more and more college athletic programs across the country are adding alcohol to their concessions at sporting events. The three main reasons listed as to why schools are allowing the sale of alcohol now are: it boosts revenue, enhances game-day experience, and increases crowd control.
According to CBSSports.com, as of July 2012, of the 120 Division-I football programs, just 21 sell beer to all fans of legal age and out of those 21 schools, only 11 of them are on-campus, university-owned stadiums (DeRusha, 2012). One of the major schools listed in the article that we read is West Virginia University. In 2011, one year after being appointed Athletic Director, Oliver Luck began having beer sold in the stadium during football games. After this first year, WVU saw its number of police cases, calls made to police, and arrests during games drop significantly. The other positive for the university was increased profits. By combing alcohol sales and sponsorships the Mountaineers were able to profit over one million dollars after just two seasons.
A few other schools mentioned in the article that have added alcohol to their list of beverage choices at sporting events are Colorado Mesa University, University of Texas-Arlington, and University of Maine. Colorado Mesa started selling beer at their baseball games for similar reasons that WVU started selling beer; they wanted to control the amount of alcohol their fans were drinking in hopes that they would have less incidents. The University of Texas-Arlington had location on their mind when adding beer and wine to the menu at basketball and volleyball games. Because of their close proximity to professional sports stadiums in the area, the university felt the need to enhance fans’ game-experience in order to compete. Also, they wanted to make sure that they were appealing to alumni and adults in the community. “The Dallas Cowboys and Texas Rangers are in our backyard, so our spectators are used to the professional experience, and that's what we're trying to provide,” stated Athletic Director, Jim Baker (Murphy, 2013). The University of Maine also wanted to increase entertainment value by created a “Bavarian Beer Garden” for their home football games. “It's more about providing a convivial, positive social environment where mature adults are given access to something they enjoy,” says Robert Dana, Vice President of Student Affairs (Murphy, 2013).
Ohio State University was the only school represented in the article on the negative side of adding alcohol to concessions at sporting events. OSU Athletic Director, Gene Smith, wants to keep their school moving in the opposite direction. He does not feel that with the size of the university they will be able to control the crowds if alcohol is sold. He also feels that it would be very costly to add more security and programs to help with the increased number of intoxicated fans. The fans’ safety his most important value, which is why he accepted the fact that there would be a loss in revenue when cutting ties with all alcohol sponsors also.
From a marketer’s standpoint, I think that universities should absolutely sell alcohol at sporting events, especially football games. It is obvious that most students, alumni, and other adult fans attending the games are going to tailgate beforehand and consume alcohol. If they knew that there was going to be alcohol provided at the stadium, then they would be less likely to spend their money at other stores to purchase it and would spend their money at the stadium instead. Also stated in the article is the cost for alcoholic beverages, which can be at a higher price. A fan consuming alcohol is most likely going to purchase more than one drink in the time that they are at the game. Revenues will increase from game day purchases, and also from increased sponsorship by alcohol companies.
This is also a way to get the student population at games to increase. Many students at JMU for example have admitted that they would rather tailgate than actually attend the game. If students knew they could purchase alcohol at the game, they might be more inclined to go, and stay there longer which also means possibly spending more money. One other point is that colleges are competing with other professional sports and entertainment events. If they want to be at their level in entertaining the crowd, they need to provide alcohol. Like Athletic Director Jim Baker said, if fans are paying a lot of money to attend college games, they should be provided the best game-day experience.
This article directly ties in with the topic of promotion and sales, which have been discussed in class. Part of the promotional mix is the atmosphere at games. We asked the question, “How can you keep fans coming back?” The other question we can add to this topic after our discussion last week about the declining number of students in attendance at football games is, “How can you keep fans for the duration of the game?” I believe that selling alcohol is one solution to this problem. According to this article it will not only solve the issue of promoting collegiate-level sporting events, but will also increase ticket sales revenue, concessions sales revenue, and sponsorship revenue.
---
Analysis by Jen Nelson in SRM 435 (section 1)
All across the United States, students, fans, and alumni are taking part in tailgating at their colleges and universities. Tailgating has become accepted as the “thing to do” before a sporting event. Not only at the college level, but at the professional level as well. Students and fans are looking to continue their drinking, but most schools and universities can’t meet their needs. Their alcohol consumption is put to a halt before they are allowed to enter the game. What many people don’t even realize, is the amount of school and universities that don’t allow alcohol sales at games. The big debate that has become quite controversial, is if alcohol should be allowed at sporting events. The article goes in-depth about several different athletic departments that believe selling alcohol is beneficial to their program which will help increase revenue for their school. On the other hand, there are many factors to consider, especially many legal aspects, which is why the majority of schools have opted not to sell alcohol.
This topic is extremely relevant the Sports Marketing Industry. Schools and Universities are essentially a business whose main goal is to provide entertainment for their fans. College and Universities are always looking for other ways to earn revenue, so why are some of them not allowing alcohol sales during games? Sporting events are all about the game-day experience, and getting everyone involved. Jim Baker, the AD at the University of Texas-Arlington states, “Another big reason to sell alcohol at athletic events is to appeal to alumni and adults in the community” (Page 2). He makes a valid point explaining that alumni and adults are an important demographic that attend a good amount of sporting events. From a promotion aspect, allowing alcohol sales would create sponsorship deals with alcohol companies, which would increase the schools revenue. On the other hand, if only 21 schools currently allow alcohol sales that is something to keep in mind. There has to be a main reason why Division 1 schools aren’t jumping on the band wagon. As a society, the drinking culture in colleges and universities will continue to increase, which will also cause more schools to need to provide more law enforcement. In the future, this is something Athletic Directors may need to change their schools polices, or keep them the way they are.
For JMU, if eventually they are going to move up conferences in the future, allowing alcohol sales, may be an option that the AD will need to take into consideration. A main problem JMU marketing faces now, is how can they get upperclassman to stay past half-time? This is a huge consideration that would potentially cause upper-classman to stay past half-time. Most upper-class man are tailgating anyways, but would like to have a drink during the game if available. Maybe JMU could establish some sort of system, like wearing wrist bands to signify you are over 21, or even a designated area of alcohol such as a Beer Garden like the University of Main has. Or like WVU, they have a no-pass out policy meaning you can’t leave the stadium at half-time to stock up on drinks and come back into the game. These are all ideas that AD’s can factor into making their decision. At the end of the day, the AD needs to do what is best for their institution. The Ohio State AD states, “It depends on the environment of a particular university. Athletic Directors who put adequate controls in place and ensure the safety of their fans should go ahead with the idea” (Page 3). So now the question is, will universities be turning off the taps, or kicking them into full gear?
The Association for Women in Sports Media is now accepting applications for the 2014 scholarship and internship program. Please click here for the application site. The program is open to female undergraduate or graduate students working toward careers in sports media – from newspaper and online writing, to broadcast journalism, to magazine writing, to sports media relations.
Winners will receive up to a $1,000 scholarship and be placed in a paid internship for the summer of 2014. The organization's 2013 interns worked at ESPN, Sports Illustrated, MLB.com, The Denver Post and The Colorado Springs Gazette.
For the fourth consecutive year, an AWSM intern will attend the intensive SJI training before beginning her sports writing internship.
Finalists will be chosen by a panel of AWSM board members, and winners will be selected by the organization's prestigious group of employers.
Applications will be accepted through Oct. 31. Winners will be notified in December/January. Students need the following to apply: resume, three references, a letter of reference and five work samples.
For more information about our internship program, please visit our site. For questions, please email awsminternship@gmail.com to get in touch with Internship Coordinator Lake Litman and AWSM Vice-President of Student Programing Stacy Hicklin Bauman.
