From Adweek
Review by Candynce Boney in KIN 501
During the San Diego vs. Denver NFL playoff game, quarterback Peyton Manning yelled out the play “Omaha Omaha” numerous times during the game before the ball was snapped back to him. During the game “Omaha” became a trending topic on twitter, with the tourism marketers of Omaha Nebraska tweeting “we certainly appreciate all the love from Peyton Manning #Omaha”. Marketing for tourism weren’t the only ones which saw the opportunity with Peyton’s “Omaha” play, “Omaha Steaks” also saw this as an opportunity to promote their restaurants name. One buffet in particular Omaha’s Warren Buffet is hoping for a promotional commercial from Peyton once the season comes to an end.
This is great marketing not only for Peyton Manning but the Bronco franchise as an entity. With Nebraska not having a home NFL team, marketers for the Broncos can use this as an opportunity to increase their fan base. Slowly starting with Peyton doing commercials in different businesses in Omaha, as the team and corporation begin to gain recognition in that part of the country they can begin to incorporate different athletes in their press. As sports marketers we can start to see how much social media can improve marketing abilities. With Twitter and Instagram being so popular in this day and age, sports marketers can use these tools to reach crowds all across the country, possibly other countries depending on the sport(s).
As a recent graduate with aspirations of going into sports marketing, whether it is for a professional team or a college team, it is important to stay up to date with the evolution of technology. Many times the most efficient way to reach a crowd is through social media or the Internet. A sports marketer should be able to follow the trending topics on twitter and decide whether they can relate that topic back to their company in a positive way, this will allow you to stay up to date with the constantly changing fads.
Realistically speaking, social media isn’t always the best route to take. There is also a possibility of social media hurting your company or organization more than it could help. For instance Stephanie Rice, an Olympic swimmer was criticized for a picture she posted on Instagram in a swimsuit. Which is pretty interesting because her career revolves around wearing a swimsuit. As a sport’s marketer it is important to understand the vision of your organization, doing something in the public eye that does not correspond with your company or organizations mission can be detrimental to a reputation. Therefore it is important to know how to reconcile any social issues that may arise with any of your athletes at any time during the year.
From CNN.com
Review by Calvin Parson, Jr. in SRM 435 (section 2)
The Winter Olympic games have been a staple in World History for over 90 years. Since 1924 athletes from around the World have gathered in one city to compete against each other in events such as skiing, figure skating, ice hockey, and curling. This year, Russia has the privilege of hosting the games for the first time in history in Sochi.
As the largest resort city in Russia, known for its resorts and sports facilities, Sochi is considered an obvious choice to host a sporting event of this magnitude. However, recent terror threats against the city, as well as civil unrest between Muslim extremist groups in the North Caucasus region of the country has provided much concern for many nations around the country who are participating in the games.
On January 20, 2014 CNN reported that a video had been posted on a Jihadi forum, and in that video, threats were being made against Sochi and specifically about a planned attack during the Olympic games. The two terrorists in the video were later identified as the suicide bombers who were responsible for attacks in Volgograd, Russia in December. The article went on to promise that regardless of the unrest in the Northern part of the country and the many attacks that have happened in Russia since Sochi was announced as the host city, that the games would be safe and that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his staff were doing everything in their power to ensure and promote safety during the games.
Unlike previous Olympic games, much of the focus this year has been taken off of the events and the athletes and placed on the threats themselves. Each day, new developments are being released regarding the attacks and what the country plans to do to keep participants and tourists safe. There is no positive “hype” surrounding these games and the nostalgia that usually comes along with the Olympics is nowhere to be found. Many people are also lashing out about Russia’s views on gay rights and how all partners of the Olympics are supporting the “Homophobic Games.”
The news surrounding the threats on the games is having an affect on many aspects of the games including the promotional elements (or lack thereof.) NBC, who is broadcasting all Olympic games through 2020, has done their due diligence to promote the athletes of the games with mini videos and commercials. However, other sponsors such as McDonalds, Samsung, Coca-Cola, and Visa have been ridiculed on social media for their partnerships with the Olympics. Ticket availability to events have also been cut in half compared to previous years games in hopes to aid security efforts. Travel has also been affected, as tourists are not allowed to fly directly into the city and hotels have been put on high security alert.
It is apparent that the threats are having a direct impact on the games and how they are being marketed and promoted in the media. Regardless if an attack occurs or not, the terror group in charge has instilled fear in the hearts of sports lovers around the world.
---
Review by Caroline Snedgear in SRM 435 (section 2)
This article addresses the recent threats specifically a video that has surfaced threatening the 2014 Winter Olympics in Russia. In the video two young men known to be involved in the suicide bombing attacks a month ago, state “we’ve prepared a present for you and all tourists who’ll come over.” These recent threats and video being released has made the public and government very concerned about the safety and security needed. Even U.S lawmakers state the games aren’t safe and wouldn’t want their families attending. This overall portrays a negative image for people traveling or thinking about attending the games. There has also been a lack of communication between the Russian and U.S. government
These threats bring up many concerns from a marketing and sales standpoint. People have already begun to boycott and this can overall affect the tickets and merchandise sales. If there is such controversy surrounding the games there is less of a chance people will want to support the games by attending this year. The city of Sochi and the Olympics in general have to make sure that they are making people aware of security and precautionary measures being put in place from a marketing standpoint for current and future concerns. With the games coming up very soon the committee will have to work very hard and make last attempts of creating a positive and safe image for the city of Sochi. The cost of the games has also risen to $45 billion where the initial budget was $12 billion due to claims that corruption was one of theses factors for pushing up the costs. Such high costs can also affect the total revenues. There has also been concern with a law that was passed outlawing “gay propaganda” where it makes it illegal to tell children about gay equality. Western leaders who have called it “archaic and discriminatory” have generally criticized this new legislation. Which has also portrayed a negative image upon the games and Russia.
From Bloomberg, PBS, and SportsBusiness Daily
Review by Ryan Biever in SRM 334
Olympic season after Olympic season, the Paralympics keep gaining air time in the United States and around the world. Even though the London Paralympics in 2012 was considered "The Best Paralympics Ever", the United States only aired five hours of coverage which consisted of highlights and a wrap up a week after the events ended. Other countries such as Britain and Australia had full coverage of the events and even shows showing the different stages of some disabilities. (Sherman, 2012) Britain has also gone to lengths of showing the opening ceremony of the Paralympics in London to show a split between the Olympics and Paralympics for the first time in history. (Stewart-Robertson, 2012) People need to be more aware and help spread the word, so the hard working athletes get the credit that they deserve and become known as a top athlete like they already are.
All three articles that were used in writing this paper relayed the same information but from different perspectives. The article from Sports Business Journal simply states that each upcoming Paralympics is set to break the previous viewing record and in order to continue to do so, networks such as NBC needs to recognize the true potential and power of the Paralympics. The Telegraph, which is a UK newspaper wrote about how they fully covered the Paralympics to their best ability while the U.S. only aired five hours, and out of those five hours, zero were live events. Some disability groups even condemned NBC due to the poor coverage. Chief executive of the disabilities council in UK was disgusted by NBC's decision saying, “For NBC to take such a decision is really, really appalling. It’s a very disappointing decision because as one of the foremost American networks they should want to celebrate these true examples of amazing sportsmanship.” (Sherman, 2012) Finally, the article from PBS just reiterated what both of the previous articles stated but also showed the comparison of the two networks approach to the event. Channel 4 of Britain showed commercials, advertisements and etc., while the U.S. exerted little to no effort to give the Paralympics any hype which is appalling.
Each Paralympics following the previous come bearing with record breaking numbers for viewers and publicity, so why won't NBC take on more than six hours of air time? There are some athletes with disabilities that are far superior in their fields than Olympic athletes, but none of their names leave anyone's lips nor does anyone acknowledge who they are. This is a big problem speaking from a media standpoint due to the issue that news and information is rarely spread and if so, it is scarce and minimally covered. If more networks were to pick up broadcasting rights for the Paralympics, it'll broaden their spectators horizon, increase revenue. attract new audience members, and offer another outlet for sports which in turn could introduce a whole new world of sport that people might find intriguing. The Broadcasting stations are failing to communicate to the audience which in correlation, the Paralympics aren't receiving the full number of fans that they actually have. Being that the Paralympics are rapidly growing, more air time is required which NBC has just now realized according to Sports Business Journal (SBC). SBC stated, "The 2012 London Summer Paralympics attracted a cumulative TV audience of 3.8 billion in more than 115 countries. The IPC now expects to beat the record viewing figures for the Winter Games..." (journal, 2013) Even though the issue has been recognized, they still only booked fifty hours of coverage which is an improvement, but not as much as what was anticipated.
The sports world continues to widen as more and more sports are introduced, it's our job and the medias job to help communicate to others to broaden their spectrum of sports and so the Paralympics can meet their full potential publicity wise.
