"Clothes make the brand"

From the Sports Business Journal: http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2011/08/22/In-Depth/Branding

Review by Renard Robinson in Kin 332 (Section 2)

In Street & Smith’s Sports Business Journal, I chose the article “Clothes Make the Brand” to write my critique on. In the section, it discusses how the idea came about of being different in designing new uniforms and the importance of having unique uniforms to attract top level recruits to their universities. With some traditional powers succumbing to modern day styles; it seems the only option to go is with the evolution of new uniforms.

It all started in 1996 following a disappointing bowl loss. Nike chairman and Oregon alum, Phil Knight, had asked his design team a simple question: “How can we help the University of Oregon attract better students and student athletes?” In order to help get Oregon on the college football map, its simplest decision was to create uniforms that were out of the norm. Like always, with change comes controversy. Many sports writers despised the uniforms, but it was all part of the grand scheme of things. Over the past 5 years, the University of Oregon has been a perennial top 25 caliber team. Prior to that, they were arguably the laughing stock of the Pac – 10. What helped them attract the recruits they needed to compete in the Pac – 10 and nationally was the best uniforms in college football.

The success of their uniforms has spread throughout the country. In 2009, Nike released the Pro Combat Uniforms featuring 10 universities; Miami, Florida, Florida State, LSU, Ohio State, Texas, TCU, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Virginia Tech. Over the past few years, they’ve expanded to include West Virginia, Arizona State, and Boise State among others. With the popularity of these uniforms, top teams are annually at an advantage from a recruiting standpoint because these uniforms are a high commodity to high school athletes. It’s evident considering all of the universities sponsored by these uniforms are traditional powers or have been relevant within the past few years since unveiling new uniforms.

---

Review by Cathleen Crouch in Kin 332 (Section 2)

This article which appeared in the Sports Business Journal, written by Michael Smith, is about how it is becoming more prevalent for schools to alter their looks by changing their uniforms in hopes of gaining more exposure and attention. In the article’s introduction it discusses how the University of Oregon revamped their football team that had no recognition with a new look and now has one of the best known football organizations in the country. This was all possible due to the use of smart decision making with their marketing and branding. Oregon’s athletic director, Rob Mullens said, “We had not had much success, so why not be bold and try something new. We used to be ridiculed for being out there, but now you look across college football and it’s the trend”. Other colleges around the country are now starting to see the success that Oregon has had with being edgy and daring with their branding and merchandise. Many more universities are now starting to follow in Oregon’s footsteps hoping for the same successful results. But for some schools, tradition over flashy merchandise is what gains recognition respect, with teams such as Penn State, Auburn and Alabama. These schools don’t need to rebrand their look to be successful. Instead, they have a tradition of being successful on the field.

Although rebranding a team in some cases proves to be more successful, universities must keep in mind that while finding a new marketing strategy can prove to be a worthwhile. However, it is also a good idea to spend time focusing on teamwork.

"NFL Back On Field, And Deals Pile Up"

From the Wall Street Journal:

Reviewed by Zack Siska in KIN 332 (Section 1)

I read an article called “NFL Back On Field, And Deals Pile Up” by Matthew Futterman in the Wall Street Journal. The article discusses the new marketing sponsorships that the NFL has signed since ending the lockout. The major deal was a 10 year extension with PepsiCo Inc. The agreement could be valued at over 2 billion dollars through the 2022 playoffs, making it one of the biggest sponsorship deals in sports history. Gatorade is a Pepsi brand and PepsiCo needed to make sure the orange Gatorade coolers stayed on the sidelines.

The NFL also signed sponsorship deals with insurer USAA, Bose Corp, and General Motors. In addition to the Pepsi deal, NFL sponsorship revenue will jump 15% this year from last year. The league revenue is projected to be a record $9.5 billion. Not only are the sponsorships increasing, but the projected attendance is projected to be higher than last year.

These deals have major marketing implications within the NFL. Now that Pepsi is signed through 2022, Powerade or other sport drink companies will not get a shot at sponsoring the NFL.

"UPS, MillerCoors go in — and go big — on campus"

From the Sports Business Journal: http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2011/08/29/Marketing-and-Sponsorship/UPS-MillerCoors.aspx

Review by Dana O'Brien in KIN 332 (section 1)

UPS and MillerCoors, two large powerhouses in the sports and marketing industry are working with a number of teams and conferences in collegiate athletics. Over the years, particularly for the beer industry is has been difficult to get sponsorships with collegiate athletics. Many schools such as North Carolina won’t even accept it, they do not permit any advertising or promotion of alcoholic beverages even if its responsibility messaging. However other schools take advantage of selling beer during football, basketball and baseball games because of the revenue it generates. MillerCoors have made deals with the schools they are working with that they will provide visible responsibility messaging such as “21 means 21”. They are also not allowed to use the logos of schools on any of their products. However, Millercoors marks and school logos can appear on co-branded merchandise such as t-shirts, hats, koozies or coolers. MillerCoors is also creating a grant program called “Great Plays” which provides funds for on-campus programs that address alcohol responsibility issues. I think MillerCoors is doing enough to make sure their target market is reached and going above what is expected to ensure their best to fight against underage drinking. After all MillerCoors is a large company that merged together they are trying to find other ways to generate revenue after losing their contract with the NFL. Its going to take some time before other schools give into selling beer at their sporting events because of the underage drinking problems that could come with it. UPS has a deal with close to 70 teams and that will allow UPS to be on the ground for college football season with access to signage, TV and radio advertising, game programs, web advertising, hospitality and tickets. Many schools will be turning to UPS for their primary way to ship and logistics.