On March 25th Nike posted and shared an advertisement on Facebook and Twitter of Tiger Woods with the text “Winning takes care of everything.” This was posted after Tiger reclaimed the #1 golfer in the world ranking on March 24th. There has been a lot of criticism towards Nike with this ad due to the scandal of Tiger cheating on his former wife. It is also sort of ironic that he is back at the #1 spot after recently revealing that he is dating skier Lindsey Vonn.
I think the ad is just Nike being Nike. This is not the first controversial ad or athlete that they have chosen to endorse. Nike usually shows a flare or arrogance with everything that they do. Cockiness is always in their repertoire it is what sets them above and apart from their rivals Under Armour, Adidas, and Reebok. Nike thrives off of this type of advertisement and the athletes that Nike markets to do the same. The main uproar from this ad is more of the family type and liberal minded people. I’ve seen the majority of complaints from mothers and non-athlete males (who aren’t in Nikes target audience). Most athletes that see this ad just laugh and shrug it off.
This was only portrayed over social media. The ad couldn’t have cost more than cost of labor to make and went viral relatively fast. It is the new era of marketing and in the future I feel like these ads that push the envelope will become more and more dominant in the media world. I feel as if the world of huge costly marketing campaigns will soon find a rival in the small viral pictures and ads posted over social media outlets. --- Review by Dale Robins-Bailey in SRM 334 (section 3)
In the past couple of days Nike released an ad with a picture of Tiger Woods lining up a putt, including his slogan “Winning Takes Care of Everything.” The picture was released on Facebook and Twitter in light of Tigers recent return to form and with it the coveted title of number one golfer in the world.
There has been an outstanding response already to the ad with over 8000 likes and 2000 shares on Facebook alone creating a huge social twitter storm. Although many have been quick to congratulate Tiger on his return to the pinnacle of golf, many have been dissatisfied with Nike’s ad claiming it to be controversial and bordering on unethical.
After his sordid love affairs that lead to the end of his 5 year marriage with Elin Nordegren, Woods hit an all-time low which lead to loss of millions in sponsorship deals along with a slip down the rankings. It is because of this many are labeling the ad highly inappropriate because it suggests that his past mistakes are all forgotten in comparison to his golfing accolades.
Whether Nike’s ambiguity is a totally ballsy move or stupidly ignorant it remains to be seen, but they are sticking to the story that the meaning behind their publication is strictly in regards to Woods’athletic performance.
The sheer volume of the social media response has forced Nike into explaining itself.
"Tiger has always said he competes to win," Nike spokesman Beth Gast said in a statement. "When asked about his goals such as getting back to No. 1, he has said consistently winning is the way to get there. The statement references that sentiment and is a salute to his athletic performance."
Despite the bad press an poll by ESPN business reporter Darren Rovell 84% said the ad was ‘No Big Deal’ with only 16% calling it ‘Offensive’. ESPN’s very own Stephen A. Smith publicly supported the Ad live on First Take saying “I absolutely loved it!” Many people seem to think just the sheer number of people talking about it through the various media avenues, will only help bolster Tigers image and Nike’s revenue streams.
Nike has always supported Woods unlike two of their last high profile ambassadors; Lance Armstrong and Oscar Pistorius whose ties have been severed after recent controversies. They have now realized it is time to move forward now Woods is on the up.
Chris and I decided for our current event to be the Miami Heat winning streak creeping up on the previous Lakers winning streak. We decided to focus mainly on how the coverage of the streak is slightly taking away from other presenting topics that are relevant right now like the NCAA tournament and March Madness. We decided to outline both the statistics of the 71’-72’ Lakers and the 12’-13’ Heat to show what kind of skill both teams had and now possess to have a streak like the record is. We also decided to show a critique video of the Heat’s streak and which teams they are going to have to face to continue the streak, I strongly believe they will beat the Laker’s previous record. For the slideshow I wanted to make sure we weren’t just reading off a slide but just have bullets and elaborate on the point we are trying to make. I believe the topic we chose correlates to the class because we are so focused on good media, can too much media be bad? We introduced a few discussion questions that the class can answer with their opinions. Obviously the attention the Heat is getting has increased their fan base greatly and will continue to as the streak continues. What we are trying to achieve by presenting this topic is for the class to understand that when one topic achieves a great amount of hype it leaves the other topics out to dry in a sense that something that could have been a great headliner is now just a sub-topic. --- Review by Chris Moffett in SRM 334 (section 2) The Miami Heat are currently sitting on a 26 game winning streak, the 2nd highest in NBA history and just 8 games shy of breaking the record of 33 straight wins set by the 1971-72 Los Angeles Lakers. Miami, already one of the most popular team in the league is generating even more press by the day due to their streak. Because of this, one may wonder whether the streak is good or bad for the NBA.
In an article by Frankie Hobbs of HoopsHabit.com, he describes that the streak is good for the NBA because March is typically a down month in the popularity of the league. One reason for this is because of March Madness, and the average basketball fan is more likely to watch the NCAA Tournament than the NBA regular season. Miami’s streak has given fans something to watch for in the NBA. Hobbs also says that the fact that at this point in the season many teams are already out of playoff contention and are now just “going through the motions”, making watching their games rather boring.
In some aspects, I agree with Hobbs that the streak is good for the League. The problem I have with the win streak is the incredible amount of media coverage the Heat get, on top of already being one of the most talked about teams in the NBA. I think that sports media has a habit of taking a story and completely running it into the ground, such as Tiger Woods, Lance Armstrong, and the struggles of the LA Lakers earlier this season. I think that the Heat getting this much coverage is resulting in a lack of coverage for other teams, specifically the Denver Nuggets, who are on a win streak of their own of 15 games, a franchise record. The media needs to better diversify the material they cover.
From Sports Networker Review by Eric Southard in KIN 332 One of the most talked about topics going on in collegiate athletics today is conference realignment. Conference realignment has been going on for over twenty years, but not until recently has it been such a controversial topic. The past five years or so, collegiate athletics has been filled with universities and colleges exiting and entering conferences. The idea of conference realignment has a big impact on the Sports Marketing Industry in many ways. In the article, “Significance and Ramifications of Conference Realignment in College Athletics”, Porsche Farr focused on three implications conference realignment has on the Sports Marketing Industry. Those three implications Farr mentioned were the loss of identity for conferences, the rivalries between schools and the financial impact involved.
The loss of conference identity affects sports marketing in that fans and players associate certain schools with certain conferences. One conference that is in shambles today is the Big East Conference. The Big East Men’s Basketball Tournament, held at Madison Square Garden, is one of the most exciting and recognizable events in all of sports. For years, this tournament has consisted of power basketball programs such as Syracuse, Louisville, and Pittsburgh. However, as of 2014, the Big East will no longer have these three schools, as they will join the Atlantic Coast Conference. Marketing wise, this hurts the Big East Conference majorly because Louisville, Pittsburgh, and Syracuse consist of some of the conference’s biggest fan markets. The second implication conference realignment has on sports marketing is that it causes rivalries to be ruined, rivalries which date back as far as the 1800s. For instance, the “Backyard Brawl”, one of the most famous college football rivalries between Pittsburgh and West Virginia University, was ended in 2011 due to West Virginia leaving the Big East and joining the Big 12. Another example is “The Missouri-Kansas Border War” rivalry which dates back to the 1890s. This rivalry ended in 2012 when Missouri left the Big 12 for the South Eastern Conference. Rivalries are used as great marketing tools for the fans, as well as for the players. The rivalry game is usually the biggest game of the year, and as a marketer, you want your product to be known and seen by all the fans. Coaches use rivalries to market and recruit players to come to their university. With the loss of these traditional rivalries, marketers and coaches are going to have a harder time selling their product. Also, “Rivalry Week” in college basketball is a huge marketing week for ESPN. Without these long-established rivalries, “Rivalry Week” will not be the same, or even exist, and ESPN could possibly lose one of its biggest weeks for the network. Last, the financial impact caused by conference realignment has an impact on sports marketing in one major way, and that being television contracts. One important aspect to know in all of this conference realignment is that TV contracts rule everything, and for some conferences, such as the Big Ten and the SEC, conference realignment will provide a huge boost to their revenue. A perfect example of this is the Big Ten and their recent additions of the University of Maryland and Rutgers University. By adding these two universities, the Big Ten’s television network, Big Ten Network, will acquire more viewers from the Washington D.C./Baltimore and New York/New Jersey television markets. New television markets equals new revenue and not only will this help the conferences, it will also provide revenue for the individual universities as well.
Although there are a few negative implications to the Sports Marketing Industry, conference realignment provides one big, positive implication, and that being money. And in the end, isn’t that what college sports all comes down to?
