From MLBSydney2014.com and International Business Times
Analysis by Stephen Dombrowski in SRM 435 (section 2)
Major League Baseball has done a great job reaching out to the global market, but this year their target is a new country: Australia. This year marks the 100th anniversary of the exhibition game between the Chicago White Sox and the New York Giants. This year’s game will feature the globally prominent Los Angeles Dodgers and a young team that is on the rise, the Arizona Diamondbacks. Sydney officials are turning the Sydney Cricket Grounds into a Major League field for March 22 and 23.
From a marketing standpoint of the MLB, this is pure genius. Baseball is on the rise in Australia. There are numerous Australians now in the game including the Rays’ Grant Balfour. After going to Japan for the last several years, they have finally picked a country where there is more potential for growth. The Australian Baseball League was started back up in 2010 and is overlooked by MLB officials. The league’s purpose is to bridge the gap between generations and create a buzz about baseball to the youth to inspire young Australians to play the game. This year was perfect using the 100 year anniversary to bring the game back and to advertise the century mark. However, there are some downfalls to having the game here. Most Australians are more interested in cricket than they are baseball. To some, this game is completely foreign to them and might now understand some of the rules. Lastly, the playing conditions and stadiums in Australia are not adequate to field a Major League ball game.
From the Australian’s standpoint, their advertising of the game in local papers has been fantastic. By having a Major League baseball game here in Australia it shows that the country is serious about getting competitive in baseball. It has been called Aussies Chasing the Dream. The way it is being promoted is to show it is similar to cricket but it being shorter and a lot more convenient to play or watch if you have other things going on in your life. The downfall again for the growth from the Australian standpoint is the lack of adequate and convenient stadiums to play the games at. It is hard to get fans excited about going to a game that does not give the fans a great experience. Cricket again is the challenge facing the growth. David Smith says, “There simply isn’t enough room in people’s minds and lives for new sports.” However, by having this game Down Under, Major League Baseball and Australia are working hard together to overcome these obstacles.
Every professional sports league is trying to branch out and gain global popularity. The NFL in London, the NBA going overseas and in China, the NHL’s large amount of foreign players, and now the MLB playing the first games of the season in other countries. This article is relevant to the course because of the constant change that is occurring throughout sports and how each league is constantly trying to gain a larger audience. It is important for any of us going into the marketing profession to know that there is more to just marketing to your local fans. There is a bigger picture and the world of baseball is becoming a smaller and smaller place.
---
Analysis by Griffin Waugh in SRM 435 (section 2)
This year opening day will come with a small twist. Most people can't wait to take the train into the Bronx and smell the fresh cut grass on April 1 of every year; that may just be me. This year the Opening Series of the 2014 MLB season will take place in Sydney, Australia on the 22nd-23rd of March. The Opening Series will feature a National League West match-up between the Arizona Diamondbacks and the Los Angeles Dodgers. The game will be played at the Sydney Cricket Ground. The last time a MLB game was played here was an exhibition game in 1914 featuring the Chicago White Sox and the New York Giants. Major League Baseball signed a $13 million deal to have the first season opener in Australia. By doing so they are passing up more money and a larger baseball market in Japan, a location that has frequently been used for the Opening Series.
This is all a part of MLB's initiative to push for more local enthusiasm for baseball in Australia. Four years ago, Major League Baseball bought a 75 percent stake in the Australian Baseball League (ABL). With Australia hosting the Opening Series, this is the first step in the process of marketing and promoting baseball in Australia. Major League Baseball Commissioner, Bud Selig recently was quoted as saying "the globalization of our game continues to be paramount to Major League Baseball, and Australia is an essential part our long-term efforts to grow the sport." (The Australian) Just by looking at MLB.com and the amount of jobs it offers with the ABL, it becomes evident that they are pushing for baseball in Australia. This untapped market offers a lot to the MLB in return as they provide a new area to grow the sport of baseball. Unlike other baseball dominant areas like Asia and the Caribbean, they lack established baseball academies. The ABL also provides minor league baseball players a chance to continue their craft as the season occurs from November to January. Many minor league players will go overseas and continue to get better during the winter months by playing in the ABL. Over the years, over 30 Major League players have come from Australia; most famously, Grant Balfour, the new closer for the Tampa Bay Rays. Major League Baseball will look to explore this new territory and market baseball in Australia in order to develop new talent in the hopes of players from Australia coming to play baseball professionally in the MLB.
This growth in baseball in Australia will create globalization for the game. Providing the MLB with new talent, fans, jobs, and revenue. The MLB is already a trillion dollar industry that could now help benefit the economy and the sport of baseball in Australia as well. New South Wales Premier Barry O'Farrell believes that their marketing and promotional efforts will pay off as "it is estimated that the matches will deliver a direct visitor impact of more than $13 million for the local economy." (International Business Times) The games will also be broadcast live in the US on ESPN. This will serve as a national stage promotion of what Australia has to offer and should increase tourism. It also will put a major sport on display for locals, which should in turn increase local enthusiasm for the game of baseball. The main reason the MLB choose Australia to host the Opening Series was to reestablish the sport of baseball in Australia. They will try to gain new fans and talent after their efforts to resurrect the ABL in 2010 were successful. The impact from the Opening Series along with the revenue generated from ticket sales and TV revenues will help provide the league with new facilities and the chance for continued expansion.
This pertains to this course because it shows what the end result of marketing and promotional efforts can be. It also sheds light on how smaller leagues and corporations grow to establish themselves as entities. I believe thanks to Major League Baseball’s dedication to this effort that baseball in Australia can be sustainable. I would even go as far as saying that it could rival Triple-A baseball, and the Caribbean Series for number of fans and TV revenues.
Showing posts with label sports marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports marketing. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
"Notre Dame, Under Armour Ink Unprecedented $90M Deal"
From Athletic Business
Analysis by Sylvia Lee in SRM 435 (section 2)
Recently, Notre Dame and Under Armour signed the most lucrative apparel and shoe deal in college athletics history. The agreement is over a 10-year period worth about $90 million in cash and merchandise. Currently, Notre Dame has a deal with Adidas, which will be ending in June.
In addition to the $90 million deal, the agreement will also allow Notre Dame to take some of the cash in company stock, potentially making the payoff even greater. Because of this, “shares of Under Armour were up more than 3 percent on the day and 80 percent over the last year.”
Notre Dame fans are worried that Under Armour will change the traditional uniforms, but Kevin Plank (CEO of Under Armour) ensured the fans that they will not make any major tweaks. The deal also does not allow Under Armour to get any signage in the stadium. Since 1930, Notre Dame’s stadium has been free of all advertisements and does not have a video replay board, and they will continue on with this tradition.
From a sport-marketing standpoint, I believe this is a huge opportunity for Under Armour since they are continuing to compete with other sporting apparel companies such as Nike and Adidas. With every Notre Dame football game being nationally televised, Under Armour will get a great amount of exposure. Because of this new deal, die-hard Notre Dame fans, students and faculty of Notre Dame could possibly also to become loyal to this brand in a sense that it may make them feel a connection with the football players and program. With about a quarter of the United States population being a college football fan, there is no doubt that Under Armour has gained a tremendous amount of publicity after signing this $90 million deal with Notre Dame.
This article is related to this sport marketing and sales course because it is about the benefits a sports team and a company gained by signing a sponsorship deal. Under Armour will get a lot of national television exposure during college football season, and Notre Dame will be getting a total of $90 million in cash and merchandise.
---
Analysis by Titus Till in SRM 435 (section 2)
On Tuesday, January 21st, 2014, Under Armour and Notre Dame announced to the world their new deal, which is arguably one of the biggest contracts in college sports history between a University and another big name company such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok or Under Armour. Notre Dame’s previous deal with Adidas was the richest in college sports with the 10-year $82 million contract that will soon expire. Notre Dame’s new contract is now being referred to as one of the most valuable shoe and apparel contracts in the country. This 10-year deal will begin as soon as the contract with Adidas expires in June. The value of the deal was not revealed by Notre Dame or Under Armour, but is estimated to be worth a whopping $90 million over the next ten years according to ESPN reporters. Notre Dame will be joining a plethora of schools across the country who have a school-wide deals with Under Armour including company owner, Kevin Plank’s, alma mater Maryland, Texas Tech, Boston College, Utah, Temple, Northwestern, South Florida and South Carolina. For the fans that may have concerns with having changes made to the historical uniforms that Notre Dame has worn for years, Plank says not to worry. Also, Under Armour will not have any signage within Notre Dame Stadium in order to keep the traditional atmosphere, which excludes any advertisements and even a video replay board within the stadium.
This deal ultimately benefits both Under Armour and Notre Dame from a marketing standpoint because of the huge fan base that both Under Armour and Notre Dame have accumulated over the years. With these two entities joining forces, more awareness of both brands will grow. Not only does this create more buzz around the Notre Dame community but also will generate more cash through Under Armour’s company stock. As of 12:30 p.m. ET on the day that this deal was announced the shares for Under Armour went up more than 3 percent and up more than 80 percent over last year. I believe that this deal will generate more sales from Notre Dame fans wanting to be apart of the new change going forth. As this relates to our class, this is a perfect example of a successful deal for both parties involved. If all deals could sound this good on paper the world would be a better place but unfortunately not every company has a growing name like Under Armour and not every school has a tradition like Notre Dame. Whoever came up with this idea to merge this school and this company was a genius from a marketing standpoint.
Analysis by Sylvia Lee in SRM 435 (section 2)
Recently, Notre Dame and Under Armour signed the most lucrative apparel and shoe deal in college athletics history. The agreement is over a 10-year period worth about $90 million in cash and merchandise. Currently, Notre Dame has a deal with Adidas, which will be ending in June.
In addition to the $90 million deal, the agreement will also allow Notre Dame to take some of the cash in company stock, potentially making the payoff even greater. Because of this, “shares of Under Armour were up more than 3 percent on the day and 80 percent over the last year.”
Notre Dame fans are worried that Under Armour will change the traditional uniforms, but Kevin Plank (CEO of Under Armour) ensured the fans that they will not make any major tweaks. The deal also does not allow Under Armour to get any signage in the stadium. Since 1930, Notre Dame’s stadium has been free of all advertisements and does not have a video replay board, and they will continue on with this tradition.
From a sport-marketing standpoint, I believe this is a huge opportunity for Under Armour since they are continuing to compete with other sporting apparel companies such as Nike and Adidas. With every Notre Dame football game being nationally televised, Under Armour will get a great amount of exposure. Because of this new deal, die-hard Notre Dame fans, students and faculty of Notre Dame could possibly also to become loyal to this brand in a sense that it may make them feel a connection with the football players and program. With about a quarter of the United States population being a college football fan, there is no doubt that Under Armour has gained a tremendous amount of publicity after signing this $90 million deal with Notre Dame.
This article is related to this sport marketing and sales course because it is about the benefits a sports team and a company gained by signing a sponsorship deal. Under Armour will get a lot of national television exposure during college football season, and Notre Dame will be getting a total of $90 million in cash and merchandise.
---
Analysis by Titus Till in SRM 435 (section 2)
On Tuesday, January 21st, 2014, Under Armour and Notre Dame announced to the world their new deal, which is arguably one of the biggest contracts in college sports history between a University and another big name company such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok or Under Armour. Notre Dame’s previous deal with Adidas was the richest in college sports with the 10-year $82 million contract that will soon expire. Notre Dame’s new contract is now being referred to as one of the most valuable shoe and apparel contracts in the country. This 10-year deal will begin as soon as the contract with Adidas expires in June. The value of the deal was not revealed by Notre Dame or Under Armour, but is estimated to be worth a whopping $90 million over the next ten years according to ESPN reporters. Notre Dame will be joining a plethora of schools across the country who have a school-wide deals with Under Armour including company owner, Kevin Plank’s, alma mater Maryland, Texas Tech, Boston College, Utah, Temple, Northwestern, South Florida and South Carolina. For the fans that may have concerns with having changes made to the historical uniforms that Notre Dame has worn for years, Plank says not to worry. Also, Under Armour will not have any signage within Notre Dame Stadium in order to keep the traditional atmosphere, which excludes any advertisements and even a video replay board within the stadium.
This deal ultimately benefits both Under Armour and Notre Dame from a marketing standpoint because of the huge fan base that both Under Armour and Notre Dame have accumulated over the years. With these two entities joining forces, more awareness of both brands will grow. Not only does this create more buzz around the Notre Dame community but also will generate more cash through Under Armour’s company stock. As of 12:30 p.m. ET on the day that this deal was announced the shares for Under Armour went up more than 3 percent and up more than 80 percent over last year. I believe that this deal will generate more sales from Notre Dame fans wanting to be apart of the new change going forth. As this relates to our class, this is a perfect example of a successful deal for both parties involved. If all deals could sound this good on paper the world would be a better place but unfortunately not every company has a growing name like Under Armour and not every school has a tradition like Notre Dame. Whoever came up with this idea to merge this school and this company was a genius from a marketing standpoint.
Monday, February 24, 2014
"Georgia Tech May Auction Tickets to Clemson Game"
From Athletic Business
Analysis by Kristina Mohler in KIN 501
Georgia Tech University is looking into adapting a new ticketing approach that Northwestern University has found to be successful. This approach is a Dutch-auction style, modified from a Netherlands style of selling flowers. Northwestern University economics professors Jeff Ely and Sandeep Boliga pitched their customized version of this auction to the athletics department for their ticket sales.
In this case, Northwestern would tailor ticket prices according to demand and popularity and set them accordingly. As game days approached, ticket prices would drop until the section was sold out. However, differing from normal Dutch auctions, if you bought a ticket at a higher price than the final buyer, you would be refunded the difference in prices in the same section. This way, everyone in the same section pays the same price and no one feels cheated. For example, if tickets go on sale for $80.00 and you buy one right away, but the price drops to $65.00 right before the game, you would be refunded $15.00. A “price floor” would be set to never go below what season ticket holders pay. This method encourages fans to not wait to buy tickets, increases revenue, fills seats, and makes season tickets more appealing. The sooner you buy, the better seats you are guaranteed. Additionally, there is a chance that the ticket price will drop and you could receive a rebate. Season tickets may be more appealing because you avoid the chance of tickets selling out at a higher price, and you avoid the auction all together.
Some schools and professional teams have started using dynamic pricing systems. These two systems are similar that their ticket prices fluctuate according to demand. However, dynamic pricing can go up or down, increasing as demand increases or decreasing as demand decreases. Therefore, someone who buys the first ticket to a game or event will pay less than the person who buys the last ticket. The Dutch auction style will only decrease, never increase. Also, dynamic pricing locks the buyer in at the price they purchase at. Northwestern’s “Purple Pledge” allows for a refund if the price drops in their section after purchasing. Both styles encourage fans to buy tickets early.
Georgia Tech’s Bobby Dodd stadium holds 55,000. Adjusting ticket pricing to higher and lower demand games could help fill seats and increase revenue. Clemson will be the largest selling game of Georgia Tech’s 2014 season, but I bet hosting Georgia in 2015 could be an even greater revenue generator. In the article, it states that Georgia Tech struggles to break even financially and does not currently fully fund scholarships for its track, cross country, or swim programs. As long as Georgia Tech truly uses increased revenue for positive incentives such as scholarship funding, I think this is a great method that could be adapted across the board.
One of my favorite parts about this is how it potentially cuts out the “second market” (StubHub, Craigslist, etc.). Some have also proposed the idea of venues having a buyback option of which they can resell for profit, instead of having a final sales policy which causes buyers to resell their tickets on such second market venues. This could be lost revenue for the original venue, especially for sold out events. To me, it makes the most sense to offer a full refund for tickets that they could then resell, especially for high-demand or sold out events. I understand how not having a buyback system avoids sales loss for events that do not sell out however. Most second markets charge a fee of their own, so fans do not receive their full money back, and new buyers usually overpay (unless tickets are marked way down). A venue buyback could potentially be a win-win for themselves and buyers, and could help eliminate second markets and perhaps some scalping. I tried selling tickets on StubHub, and it was going to be impossible for me to get my money back. The demand for the game had decreased since I bought the tickets, and I would have had to post them for more than I bought them for in order to end up with my money back after StubHub got their percentage of the sale.
The article states that Northwestern did not offer sales figures to Georgia Tech, but said that the auctions had been successful. I am interested to see final numbers for both schools for both the higher demand games and the lower demand games.
View from the Northwestern News Network
Georgia Tech University is looking into adapting a new ticketing approach that Northwestern University has found to be successful. This approach is a Dutch-auction style, modified from a Netherlands style of selling flowers. Northwestern University economics professors Jeff Ely and Sandeep Boliga pitched their customized version of this auction to the athletics department for their ticket sales.
In this case, Northwestern would tailor ticket prices according to demand and popularity and set them accordingly. As game days approached, ticket prices would drop until the section was sold out. However, differing from normal Dutch auctions, if you bought a ticket at a higher price than the final buyer, you would be refunded the difference in prices in the same section. This way, everyone in the same section pays the same price and no one feels cheated. For example, if tickets go on sale for $80.00 and you buy one right away, but the price drops to $65.00 right before the game, you would be refunded $15.00. A “price floor” would be set to never go below what season ticket holders pay. This method encourages fans to not wait to buy tickets, increases revenue, fills seats, and makes season tickets more appealing. The sooner you buy, the better seats you are guaranteed. Additionally, there is a chance that the ticket price will drop and you could receive a rebate. Season tickets may be more appealing because you avoid the chance of tickets selling out at a higher price, and you avoid the auction all together.
Some schools and professional teams have started using dynamic pricing systems. These two systems are similar that their ticket prices fluctuate according to demand. However, dynamic pricing can go up or down, increasing as demand increases or decreasing as demand decreases. Therefore, someone who buys the first ticket to a game or event will pay less than the person who buys the last ticket. The Dutch auction style will only decrease, never increase. Also, dynamic pricing locks the buyer in at the price they purchase at. Northwestern’s “Purple Pledge” allows for a refund if the price drops in their section after purchasing. Both styles encourage fans to buy tickets early.
Georgia Tech’s Bobby Dodd stadium holds 55,000. Adjusting ticket pricing to higher and lower demand games could help fill seats and increase revenue. Clemson will be the largest selling game of Georgia Tech’s 2014 season, but I bet hosting Georgia in 2015 could be an even greater revenue generator. In the article, it states that Georgia Tech struggles to break even financially and does not currently fully fund scholarships for its track, cross country, or swim programs. As long as Georgia Tech truly uses increased revenue for positive incentives such as scholarship funding, I think this is a great method that could be adapted across the board.
One of my favorite parts about this is how it potentially cuts out the “second market” (StubHub, Craigslist, etc.). Some have also proposed the idea of venues having a buyback option of which they can resell for profit, instead of having a final sales policy which causes buyers to resell their tickets on such second market venues. This could be lost revenue for the original venue, especially for sold out events. To me, it makes the most sense to offer a full refund for tickets that they could then resell, especially for high-demand or sold out events. I understand how not having a buyback system avoids sales loss for events that do not sell out however. Most second markets charge a fee of their own, so fans do not receive their full money back, and new buyers usually overpay (unless tickets are marked way down). A venue buyback could potentially be a win-win for themselves and buyers, and could help eliminate second markets and perhaps some scalping. I tried selling tickets on StubHub, and it was going to be impossible for me to get my money back. The demand for the game had decreased since I bought the tickets, and I would have had to post them for more than I bought them for in order to end up with my money back after StubHub got their percentage of the sale.
The article states that Northwestern did not offer sales figures to Georgia Tech, but said that the auctions had been successful. I am interested to see final numbers for both schools for both the higher demand games and the lower demand games.
"Super Bowl Ad Placement Key to Brand Recognition"
From Sport Marketing Association
Analysis by Jessalyn Stone in KIN 501
The largest football game of the year, the Super Bowl, was played on February 2, 2014 and as always the cost for the advertisement slots were steep. On average the cost for a 30-second commercial to be aired during the Super Bowl cost $4 million. According to sports marketing researchers the companies whose commercials are aired earlier in the game, particularly during the first and last block of commercials in the first period, also referred to as pods, will have a greater likelihood of brand recognition. Accordingly the effectiveness of advertising decreases as the game goes on while it peaks in the earlier game quarters. Specifically the commercials during the first and last commercial breaks of the first quarter of the game, yield the greatest results if the goal of the advertisement is to increase awareness of brand among sports viewers. Based on this research advertisers can gain a better understanding of when the most ideal time is to place an ad in a commercial break of the Super Bowl to maximize brand awareness as well as knowing how to increase advertising rates during the prime “pods”.
From a sports marketing standpoint research provided in this article could be very beneficial to advertisement and the goals of those specific ads. With this particular research it discusses the goals of advertisements as a means to increase brand recognition. That could be a very beneficial tool for companies knowing how to place ads, especially during the Super Bowl. If however ad recognition is already very well known the company should instead focus on what quarter of commercials to place their ad. Although this research isn’t full proof it can provide valuable information to marketing agencies. This particular year however this research was proven to not be entirely true. The overall number 1 commercial of the Super Bowl occurred during the 2 minute warning of the last quarter of the game. There obviously are other factors to consider as well including the target audience and how the audience is being drawn in by the ad.
Throughout this course we talk about how to target specific populations and how to appeal to a variety of individuals. The Super Bowl obviously is a key example of a large variety of individuals that are viewing the same thing. People of all ages, ethnicities, incomes, regional areas and so on are all viewing the same event. Marketing is used to try and appeal to all kinds of people. Knowing how to target a variety of audiences while getting your branding to the audience is a very important component. Articles such as this one can be utilized in this class to try and focus on the goals of marketing.
Analysis by Jessalyn Stone in KIN 501
The largest football game of the year, the Super Bowl, was played on February 2, 2014 and as always the cost for the advertisement slots were steep. On average the cost for a 30-second commercial to be aired during the Super Bowl cost $4 million. According to sports marketing researchers the companies whose commercials are aired earlier in the game, particularly during the first and last block of commercials in the first period, also referred to as pods, will have a greater likelihood of brand recognition. Accordingly the effectiveness of advertising decreases as the game goes on while it peaks in the earlier game quarters. Specifically the commercials during the first and last commercial breaks of the first quarter of the game, yield the greatest results if the goal of the advertisement is to increase awareness of brand among sports viewers. Based on this research advertisers can gain a better understanding of when the most ideal time is to place an ad in a commercial break of the Super Bowl to maximize brand awareness as well as knowing how to increase advertising rates during the prime “pods”.
Throughout this course we talk about how to target specific populations and how to appeal to a variety of individuals. The Super Bowl obviously is a key example of a large variety of individuals that are viewing the same thing. People of all ages, ethnicities, incomes, regional areas and so on are all viewing the same event. Marketing is used to try and appeal to all kinds of people. Knowing how to target a variety of audiences while getting your branding to the audience is a very important component. Articles such as this one can be utilized in this class to try and focus on the goals of marketing.
Friday, February 21, 2014
Super Bowl XLVIII and weather concerns
From Fansided.com, USA Today 1, USA Today 2, 9news.com, and NFL.com
Analysis by Donshae Joyce in SRM 334 (section 1)
For our article review, we chose to do it on the weather concerns surrounding Super Bowl XLVIII and the accommodations that were planned to counter any inclement weather threatening the event. Although the weather for the game turned out to be more ideal than originally expected, the National Football League encountered uncharted territory in having to plan for the “coldest Super Bowl in history”, as many emphatically described it. As a group, we wanted to dive into the effects that the weather had on the NFL’s preparations for the game, and further educate ourselves on the duties of sports industry employees when dealing with situations such as this one.
Of course, the decision of having the Super Bowl in New Jersey in February came with intense consideration and deliberation on behalf of the NFL. Therefore, it is a safe assumption that the NFL would be prepared for the weather. However, the New Jersey/New York area was hit with a huge snowstorm just weeks before the scheduled date of the game. This caused for major contingency planning from the NFL and MetLife Stadium (where the game was held in East Rutherford, New Jersey). A few of the modifications that had to take place involved: hiring over 1,000 workers to shovel more than 13 inches of snow inside of MetLife Stadium, the NFL providing fans with a cold gear package when they enter the stadium (including hand warmers, gloves, a hat and scarf), groundsmen had to paint the endzones of the field under tents to keep snow from ruining the paint, and the most controversial altering was the possibility of rescheduling the date of the game. Another modification that the NFL might not have taken into consideration was the issue of ticket prices decreases due to the inclement weather. According to a report by Darren Rovell on ESPN.com, Super Bowl tickets went from being the most expensive to the least expensive by reactions from the resale ticket market. Nine days before Super Bowl XLVIII, the cheapest ticket to buy on NFL Ticket Exchange was $1,779. That is $409 cheaper than it was on the site with that many days left last year and $809 cheaper than the year before. The original price was $2,700 before the snowstorm.
The relevancy relationship between this situation and our course has to do with the contingency plan. Working in the sports industry, there are factors that may be uncontrollable that require quick planning and maneuvering for. In this case, the NFL having to deal with inclement weather and how it handled the situation was a good example of a contingency plan and adjusting to the hand that was dealt to it.
---
Analysis by Anthony Rose in SRM 334 (section 1)
The Super Bowl was played on February, 2, 2014 at East Rutherford New Jersey in the MetLife Stadium. The teams that are participating in the game are the Denver Broncos as the home team and the Seattle Seahawks as the away team. This Super Bowl is such a big deal because it is making history because its the first cold weather Super Bowl in NFL history. The National Football League has been doing a lot of work to get the Super Bowl played on the set date but with the weather that New Jersey is used to getting the NFL has to have a contingency plan.
The National Football League had to hire over a thousand workers to clear the MetLife Stadium a couple of days before the Super Bowl game because of the snow storm that hit the area messed the stadium up. The endzones were painted under tents to stay clear of the weather of the weather. To help the fans out with the cold weather the NFL has teamed up with a company called Woodinville based company BDA Inc. to get the fans warm gear to for the game such as hand warmers, ear muffs, gloves, and scarfs. The MetLife stadium also have warm area for the fans that are going to tailgate. All these are the strategies to prepare for the game.
The contingency plan for the Super Bowl is just in case of bad weather. The NFL will be played and hour later or a couple of hours before just so they won’t have to deal with lawsuits from other leagues. The other plan is to move the game the Monday after the original date and the Friday or Saturday before the original date planned.
The plan for the game has not been set yet these are just some temporary thoughts. The National Football League are just taking precautions for the weather because this is one of the biggest events that take place in the country. The NFL want to make sure the fans are going to have and awesome experience also while also the people watching the game also.
Analysis by Donshae Joyce in SRM 334 (section 1)
For our article review, we chose to do it on the weather concerns surrounding Super Bowl XLVIII and the accommodations that were planned to counter any inclement weather threatening the event. Although the weather for the game turned out to be more ideal than originally expected, the National Football League encountered uncharted territory in having to plan for the “coldest Super Bowl in history”, as many emphatically described it. As a group, we wanted to dive into the effects that the weather had on the NFL’s preparations for the game, and further educate ourselves on the duties of sports industry employees when dealing with situations such as this one.
Of course, the decision of having the Super Bowl in New Jersey in February came with intense consideration and deliberation on behalf of the NFL. Therefore, it is a safe assumption that the NFL would be prepared for the weather. However, the New Jersey/New York area was hit with a huge snowstorm just weeks before the scheduled date of the game. This caused for major contingency planning from the NFL and MetLife Stadium (where the game was held in East Rutherford, New Jersey). A few of the modifications that had to take place involved: hiring over 1,000 workers to shovel more than 13 inches of snow inside of MetLife Stadium, the NFL providing fans with a cold gear package when they enter the stadium (including hand warmers, gloves, a hat and scarf), groundsmen had to paint the endzones of the field under tents to keep snow from ruining the paint, and the most controversial altering was the possibility of rescheduling the date of the game. Another modification that the NFL might not have taken into consideration was the issue of ticket prices decreases due to the inclement weather. According to a report by Darren Rovell on ESPN.com, Super Bowl tickets went from being the most expensive to the least expensive by reactions from the resale ticket market. Nine days before Super Bowl XLVIII, the cheapest ticket to buy on NFL Ticket Exchange was $1,779. That is $409 cheaper than it was on the site with that many days left last year and $809 cheaper than the year before. The original price was $2,700 before the snowstorm.
The relevancy relationship between this situation and our course has to do with the contingency plan. Working in the sports industry, there are factors that may be uncontrollable that require quick planning and maneuvering for. In this case, the NFL having to deal with inclement weather and how it handled the situation was a good example of a contingency plan and adjusting to the hand that was dealt to it.
---
Analysis by Anthony Rose in SRM 334 (section 1)
The Super Bowl was played on February, 2, 2014 at East Rutherford New Jersey in the MetLife Stadium. The teams that are participating in the game are the Denver Broncos as the home team and the Seattle Seahawks as the away team. This Super Bowl is such a big deal because it is making history because its the first cold weather Super Bowl in NFL history. The National Football League has been doing a lot of work to get the Super Bowl played on the set date but with the weather that New Jersey is used to getting the NFL has to have a contingency plan.
The National Football League had to hire over a thousand workers to clear the MetLife Stadium a couple of days before the Super Bowl game because of the snow storm that hit the area messed the stadium up. The endzones were painted under tents to stay clear of the weather of the weather. To help the fans out with the cold weather the NFL has teamed up with a company called Woodinville based company BDA Inc. to get the fans warm gear to for the game such as hand warmers, ear muffs, gloves, and scarfs. The MetLife stadium also have warm area for the fans that are going to tailgate. All these are the strategies to prepare for the game.
The contingency plan for the Super Bowl is just in case of bad weather. The NFL will be played and hour later or a couple of hours before just so they won’t have to deal with lawsuits from other leagues. The other plan is to move the game the Monday after the original date and the Friday or Saturday before the original date planned.
The plan for the game has not been set yet these are just some temporary thoughts. The National Football League are just taking precautions for the weather because this is one of the biggest events that take place in the country. The NFL want to make sure the fans are going to have and awesome experience also while also the people watching the game also.
"Jay Z to advise Ndamukong Suh"
From ESPN.com
Analysis by Jordan Callis in SRM 435 (section 2)
In “Ndamukong Suh Joins Jay-Z’s Roc Nation Agency,” author Will Brinson discusses the recent move that Detroit Lions’ defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh has made regarding his representation. Suh recently left his former representative agency, Relativity Sports, to join forces with Roc Nation, who has recently made a splash by signing the likes of Victor Cruz and Robinson Cano. Brinson suggests that Roc Nation could help Suh mend a reputation that is in need of repairing after multiple incidents where Suh has kicked, stomped, and roughed other players and received multiple thousand-dollar fines. Brinson adds that while Suh has had his problems, he is still a very good player and seems to have a huge upside; and with his current contract soon to expire, a long term deal would make sense for both the Lions and Suh because his salary cap number for 2014 is $22.4 million, which is definitely on the high side.
While Brinson notes that it is unsure whether Roc Nation will be handling the contract negotiations for Suh, it seems that allowing this could serve Suh well, as Roc Nation is fresh off landing Robinson Cano a record deal with the Seattle Mariners. Regardless, Roc Nation will be able to market Suh in ways that other agencies simply cannot due to Jay-Z’s popularity and connections. Brinson is surely correct in noting Suh’s damaged reputation will be a difficult one to restore, but if anyone can do it, Roc Nation seems to be the go-to. The one thing that Suh has to his advantage is his play on the field. Players’ marketability increases when their play on the field is high-caliber. When it comes to players getting promotional deals, positive play on the field seems only second to an outstanding reputation off the field. Suh will not the Peyton Manning’s of the industry in terms of source power or attractiveness, but a potential deal for Suh to represent a company that manufactures and/or distributes football equipment would make sense in terms of source credibility, as Suh is one of the top defensive tackles in the game and has made a name for himself on the field. However, in order for endorsement deals to be a reality for Suh, a community service project with his name on it might be a more important angle to sell to the public at this point.
This article relates to our class because it concerns organizations and how they market their products. Organizations need promotions that can accurately and effectively communicate information about their products, and if organizations choose an athlete to represent their products/services (which many in the sport industry do), they want to be sure that they pick one who will leave their brand in better shape than before. In this case, Ndamukong Suh will be using Roc Nation to convince organizations that he is the best choice to represent their brand. It is up to Suh to avoid any behavior or situations that will negatively impact Roc Nation’s ability to sell him to companies. Additionally, Roc Nation must seek out the most fitting endorsement deals for Suh.
---
Analysis by James Naylor in SRM 435 (section 2)
Analysis by Jordan Callis in SRM 435 (section 2)
In “Ndamukong Suh Joins Jay-Z’s Roc Nation Agency,” author Will Brinson discusses the recent move that Detroit Lions’ defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh has made regarding his representation. Suh recently left his former representative agency, Relativity Sports, to join forces with Roc Nation, who has recently made a splash by signing the likes of Victor Cruz and Robinson Cano. Brinson suggests that Roc Nation could help Suh mend a reputation that is in need of repairing after multiple incidents where Suh has kicked, stomped, and roughed other players and received multiple thousand-dollar fines. Brinson adds that while Suh has had his problems, he is still a very good player and seems to have a huge upside; and with his current contract soon to expire, a long term deal would make sense for both the Lions and Suh because his salary cap number for 2014 is $22.4 million, which is definitely on the high side.
While Brinson notes that it is unsure whether Roc Nation will be handling the contract negotiations for Suh, it seems that allowing this could serve Suh well, as Roc Nation is fresh off landing Robinson Cano a record deal with the Seattle Mariners. Regardless, Roc Nation will be able to market Suh in ways that other agencies simply cannot due to Jay-Z’s popularity and connections. Brinson is surely correct in noting Suh’s damaged reputation will be a difficult one to restore, but if anyone can do it, Roc Nation seems to be the go-to. The one thing that Suh has to his advantage is his play on the field. Players’ marketability increases when their play on the field is high-caliber. When it comes to players getting promotional deals, positive play on the field seems only second to an outstanding reputation off the field. Suh will not the Peyton Manning’s of the industry in terms of source power or attractiveness, but a potential deal for Suh to represent a company that manufactures and/or distributes football equipment would make sense in terms of source credibility, as Suh is one of the top defensive tackles in the game and has made a name for himself on the field. However, in order for endorsement deals to be a reality for Suh, a community service project with his name on it might be a more important angle to sell to the public at this point.
This article relates to our class because it concerns organizations and how they market their products. Organizations need promotions that can accurately and effectively communicate information about their products, and if organizations choose an athlete to represent their products/services (which many in the sport industry do), they want to be sure that they pick one who will leave their brand in better shape than before. In this case, Ndamukong Suh will be using Roc Nation to convince organizations that he is the best choice to represent their brand. It is up to Suh to avoid any behavior or situations that will negatively impact Roc Nation’s ability to sell him to companies. Additionally, Roc Nation must seek out the most fitting endorsement deals for Suh.
---
Analysis by James Naylor in SRM 435 (section 2)
Lion’s defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh recently signed with Roc Nation sports agency according to ESPN analyst Adam Shefter. He recently left his former agency, Relativity Sports and according to analysts, it may be time for Suh to change his image. Jay Z may be the one who gives him that opportunity. Jay Z is the agent of a few NFL athletes, but Suh will be his most recognized yet. Suh is infamously known for his excessive intensity during the game. He is a very powerful pass rusher who is most recognized for stomping on a player and kicking another, not to mention all the penalties he’s accumulated for roughing-the-passer. Suh may be potentially trying to get on the good side of the news by switching agencies. Suh is in the last year of his contract and Jay Z may try to negotiate a new deal or just focus on Suh’s marketability.
With regards to marketing and promotions, there seems to be potential opportunity by signing endorsement deals with Suh who has already made deals with Nike, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Subway and Chrysler. With an agent like Jay Z who has experienced tremendous short-term success by signing big names, other major companies may want to look into making deals with Suh. Jay Z has helped other clients such as Robinson Cano, arguably the MLB’s best second baseman, who signed his first endorsement deal with Pepsi last summer. The other aspect of this is there may be too much of a risk to deal with Suh. There is cause for concern since Suh was rated the NFL’s dirtiest player as well as the league’s least liked player. However, with a new agent, Suh may be able to change his image, sign major endorsements and gain a better reputation.
This is relevant to our class because the marketability of professional athletes plays a major role in advertising and promotion. Suh may be on the verge of making serious money sponsoring various goods. By marketing Suh positively, Roc Nation may be able to increase Suh’s source attractiveness and credibility. With the multiple connections Roc Nation has, Suh can gain more exposure and help tap into new markets helping not only companies he signs endorsements with, but the NFL as well.
With regards to marketing and promotions, there seems to be potential opportunity by signing endorsement deals with Suh who has already made deals with Nike, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Subway and Chrysler. With an agent like Jay Z who has experienced tremendous short-term success by signing big names, other major companies may want to look into making deals with Suh. Jay Z has helped other clients such as Robinson Cano, arguably the MLB’s best second baseman, who signed his first endorsement deal with Pepsi last summer. The other aspect of this is there may be too much of a risk to deal with Suh. There is cause for concern since Suh was rated the NFL’s dirtiest player as well as the league’s least liked player. However, with a new agent, Suh may be able to change his image, sign major endorsements and gain a better reputation.
This is relevant to our class because the marketability of professional athletes plays a major role in advertising and promotion. Suh may be on the verge of making serious money sponsoring various goods. By marketing Suh positively, Roc Nation may be able to increase Suh’s source attractiveness and credibility. With the multiple connections Roc Nation has, Suh can gain more exposure and help tap into new markets helping not only companies he signs endorsements with, but the NFL as well.
Monday, February 17, 2014
"Reseating Plan Blamed for Low WVU Hoops Attendance"
From Athletic Business
Analysis by Kevin Albright in KIN 501
The article that I came across was in the Athletic Business Journal and it deals with a reseating plan at West Virginia University basketball games. More specifically sources think that this reseating plan has lead to lower attendances for this season’s games. Season ticket holders seats were taken from them and the new reseating plan gave the better seats to those who were larger donors to the program. The first game of the season there was a good attendance but since then the average is nearly half of that first game. The author then goes on to examine if this reseating plan truly is harming the attendance. Although the number of season ticket renewals went down they do not think it is a result of the reseating plan because their donations increased and more money was raised from season ticket holders this year compared to last. He explains that last year the Mountaineers didn’t perform that well and this year is a rebuild year which is why attendance may be lacking. The author feels that the attendance numbers are down because the students are not coming out to support their team and he feels this is an area of concern across the country.
Attendance to sporting events is a huge focus of sport marketing and I think it is often tough to tell why or why not fans may be attending games. There are a lot of different factors that may affect attendance as you can see with this article. The issue that I would like to focus on is the lack of student support. I agree with the author that a lot of schools are suffering from minimal student support and it takes away from the college basketball atmosphere. Based on my experiences the students tend to be the most boisterous fans and they can have an impact on the game and create that home court advantage. Being at JMU I have seen great crowds for a college game and I have also seen poor crowds for a college game and in my opinion a lot of it has to do with the students. I understand that season ticket holders bring in the money which is a primary focus, I feel that to create that ideal atmosphere you need a good group of student fans. For example, Duke has the Cameron Crazies which is the name they give their student fans who show up regularly and camp out for tickets, stand the whole game, paint their faces, and are extremely loud. Duke is a program with a rich basketball history and has a habit of being very competitive so that may make it easier for student fans to rally behind the team.
I found this article interesting because like the author said, every school seems to be losing student fans and the sports marketing departments can help to recruit those fans back to games. I believe that seating does have an impact on the amount of fans that come weather they are season ticket holders or students. The better your seat is or the closer you are to the court the more you feel involved in the game which is the experience fans want to have. Obviously not everyone can have the best seats but I would be interested to see in venues around the country what seems to be the most beneficial seating arrangement for fans to maximize attendance.
The article that I came across was in the Athletic Business Journal and it deals with a reseating plan at West Virginia University basketball games. More specifically sources think that this reseating plan has lead to lower attendances for this season’s games. Season ticket holders seats were taken from them and the new reseating plan gave the better seats to those who were larger donors to the program. The first game of the season there was a good attendance but since then the average is nearly half of that first game. The author then goes on to examine if this reseating plan truly is harming the attendance. Although the number of season ticket renewals went down they do not think it is a result of the reseating plan because their donations increased and more money was raised from season ticket holders this year compared to last. He explains that last year the Mountaineers didn’t perform that well and this year is a rebuild year which is why attendance may be lacking. The author feels that the attendance numbers are down because the students are not coming out to support their team and he feels this is an area of concern across the country.
Attendance to sporting events is a huge focus of sport marketing and I think it is often tough to tell why or why not fans may be attending games. There are a lot of different factors that may affect attendance as you can see with this article. The issue that I would like to focus on is the lack of student support. I agree with the author that a lot of schools are suffering from minimal student support and it takes away from the college basketball atmosphere. Based on my experiences the students tend to be the most boisterous fans and they can have an impact on the game and create that home court advantage. Being at JMU I have seen great crowds for a college game and I have also seen poor crowds for a college game and in my opinion a lot of it has to do with the students. I understand that season ticket holders bring in the money which is a primary focus, I feel that to create that ideal atmosphere you need a good group of student fans. For example, Duke has the Cameron Crazies which is the name they give their student fans who show up regularly and camp out for tickets, stand the whole game, paint their faces, and are extremely loud. Duke is a program with a rich basketball history and has a habit of being very competitive so that may make it easier for student fans to rally behind the team.
I found this article interesting because like the author said, every school seems to be losing student fans and the sports marketing departments can help to recruit those fans back to games. I believe that seating does have an impact on the amount of fans that come weather they are season ticket holders or students. The better your seat is or the closer you are to the court the more you feel involved in the game which is the experience fans want to have. Obviously not everyone can have the best seats but I would be interested to see in venues around the country what seems to be the most beneficial seating arrangement for fans to maximize attendance.
"Empty seats, lack of buzz fill Sochi Olympics"
From The Kansas City Star
Analysis by Nick Kusko in KIN 501
The article from the Kansas City Star addressed the lack of attendance throughout the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics. The article explained that there has traditionally been an increase in the turnout of events as the Olympics go on, but at Sochi, this rise has not occurred. The issue was so concerning that it reached the highest levels of the International Olympic Committee. As an example, the men’s downhill, which was considered to be the main event of the Alpine ski schedule, failed to reach a capacity crowd.
Tickets to the various events were sold beforehand, but the turnout has not been there. The Sochi Olympic Committee has resorted to using volunteers to get people in the stands. The Russian crowds that have made it to the events have not been especially enthusiastic, and the competition environment has been somewhat dull.
The Sochi Olympic venues have been the most expensive to construct in history. Unfortunately, people around the world just do not seem as interested in these games despite it showcasing the best athletes of the world. A large reason for the negative buzz around Sochi are the security worries and poor living conditions for the athletes. There have been threats of terror that have intimidated people away from the games, even including some families of the competing athletes. Airfare and hotel costs have also been recorded as being unreasonably high.
There has recently been a surge of pictures to hit the web entitled “Sochi Fails,” which include a lack of privacy in bathrooms, dangerous living conditions, and an overwhelming presence of stray dogs. This type of publicity was not the attention the Olympic Committee was hoping to receive.
The Olympics will always be under scrutiny due to its spectacular nature. Any Olympic Committee will expect to deliver excellence, and Sochi has arguably failed in this aspect thus far. One thing is for sure, Sochi will not be hosting any Olympic events anytime in the near or distant future.
Analysis by Nick Kusko in KIN 501
The article from the Kansas City Star addressed the lack of attendance throughout the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics. The article explained that there has traditionally been an increase in the turnout of events as the Olympics go on, but at Sochi, this rise has not occurred. The issue was so concerning that it reached the highest levels of the International Olympic Committee. As an example, the men’s downhill, which was considered to be the main event of the Alpine ski schedule, failed to reach a capacity crowd.
Tickets to the various events were sold beforehand, but the turnout has not been there. The Sochi Olympic Committee has resorted to using volunteers to get people in the stands. The Russian crowds that have made it to the events have not been especially enthusiastic, and the competition environment has been somewhat dull.
The Sochi Olympic venues have been the most expensive to construct in history. Unfortunately, people around the world just do not seem as interested in these games despite it showcasing the best athletes of the world. A large reason for the negative buzz around Sochi are the security worries and poor living conditions for the athletes. There have been threats of terror that have intimidated people away from the games, even including some families of the competing athletes. Airfare and hotel costs have also been recorded as being unreasonably high.
There has recently been a surge of pictures to hit the web entitled “Sochi Fails,” which include a lack of privacy in bathrooms, dangerous living conditions, and an overwhelming presence of stray dogs. This type of publicity was not the attention the Olympic Committee was hoping to receive.
The Olympics will always be under scrutiny due to its spectacular nature. Any Olympic Committee will expect to deliver excellence, and Sochi has arguably failed in this aspect thus far. One thing is for sure, Sochi will not be hosting any Olympic events anytime in the near or distant future.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
"Analysts: Windfalls for Super Bowl Host Overblown"
From Athletic Business
Review by Jonathan Parker in SRM 435 (section 1)
Super Bowl XLVIII in New York was the first Super Bowl to be held in an outdoor venue. The NFL and economists are arguing if the host city earns any money for their economy from the Super Bowl and all of its events that are associated with it. Economists are saying that the host city, this year New York City, will receive very little to no money from hosting the Super Bowl. They argue that most of the spending was on the tickets, the beer, and the souvenirs associated with the game. Most of that money goes out of town with the retailers that sold these items. Also the NFL has a tax-exempt policy that allows employees working the Super Bowl to avoid any local sales tax on their food and lodging. From this policy, it was estimated that New Orleans lost around $800,000 from hosting the Super Bowl, the year before. The NFL states the economy of New York and New Jersey would see an increase of about $600 million from Super Bowl spending. The NFL’s reasoning was from the fact that more hotels and restaurants were being booked because of the Super Bowl. Also the NFL states that the host city spends a lot of money to lure the big game to their city. With the only reason for doing such, was because of the money their local economy would receive from the outside visitors.
The problem is that the NFL has not shown where they have come up with such a large number, keeping the economists skeptical. The economists fear displacement for the visitors not there for the Super Bowl, because the Super Bowl visitors would fill all of the hotels leaving other visitors to go elsewhere, but New York. The weather this year for the Super Bowl was actually a bonus because it was not during the main tourist season in New York City and from New York City, having so many hotels that it would not displace anyone regardless if they are there for the game or not. A non-NFL study showed the impact of the Super Bowl is around $30-120 million in overall spending. New York should experience around $100 million in increased revenue and a few million will be generated in the form of new taxes.
From a sports sales promotion, I think it is crazy that the NFL thinks the Super Bowl brings in $600 million for New York’s economy. I feel this way because the NFL has to get a certain percentage from all the money spent around the Super Bowl and also the vendors and sponsors for the Super Bowl would get their money as well. Meaning it would leave New York with some new money, but probably not as much as they deserve. Using a sales standpoint, I do not feel the economists see the benefit that a host city has when hosting the Super Bowl. I think the economists always take a worldly view, because they see the economy of the nation, not as a healthy entity and the fact that why would one event change the outcome of one city’s economic status. I think economists need to understand that the sports field continues to grow at an unprecedented pace and continues to attract more fans year by year. Because of this, it can cause a tremendous amount of money to be generated. Another sales point, is that the NFL makes a lot of money from merchandise, tickets, and sponsors that the host city deserves by hosting the Super Bowl. The host city spends a large amount of money in an attempt to host the game and the city that gets the game should actually see most of the revenue.
The NFL from a marketing and promotion point needs the Super Bowl Committee to release their stats a whole lot sooner than after four years have passed. I think they need to because economists, sales people, and local venues want to see the impact that the Super Bowl can have on host cities. Then they will know how to prepare and respond to the situation and see how the NFL came up with their numbers. I think the local stores and vendors would see an increase in sales and revenue because of the attendees the Super Bowl attracts. Many people spend the whole week, within the city, leading up to the game and from this they will be spending money on food, shopping, hotels, and even transportation with cabs and buses.
The article is relevant to SRM 435 because it show the 4P’s of marketing. Product is the Super Bowl, place is of course New York City, promotion is everywhere from TV, to social media, and price is the cost for tickets, hotels, food, and souvenirs. Also the article shows consumer behavior when it comes to dealing with the Super Bowl. It shows how the NFL feels the Super Bowl will draw in the crowds and that how host cities try to outbid each other, just for the economic opportunity that the big game can bring to an area. Finally, the article is relevant to the course in that the Super Bowl can be a money making revenue for the host city. To determine if a sports promotion is successful is determined by the revenue that it generates.
---
Review by John Boitnott in SRM 435 (section 1)
In the article Analysts: Windfalls for Super Bowl Host Overthrown, the question of how much revenue host cities of the Super Bowl actually make is brought up. The article starts by giving the NFL’s claim of how much of a boost the Super Bowl brings to a city’s economy, and then shows that the NFL would want to say that because cities spend hundreds of millions to lure the big game to them. The article goes on to explain how the league won’t reveal how they came up with the figure of how much it benefits the local economies, and uses research and quotes from professional economists to show that the average economic impact is actually around $30 million to $120 million as opposed to the $600 million figure that the NFL states.
From a sport marketing, promotions, and sales standpoint this article can surprise someone when they read that most of the money from branded items goes right back out of town. Except for the small proportion that is paid to the vendors, much of the money leaves the city once the Super Bowl leaves. The state of New York alone spent $5 million on advertising events, and when looking at how much money leaves their economy it can be called into question as to how much the costs were really worth and if the amount of revenue earned after that was actually worth the investment. If future host cities and cities vying for a bid take advice from the economists who contributed to this article, it could have a significant impact on how everything is approached. Marketing and sales strategies and schemes could be changed to make sure the revenue earned from the game stays in the area, and if enough cities collaborate together the prices of Super Bowl bids could drop unless the NFL can somehow guarantee that the city will keep a certain percentage of profits that are able to be measured.
This article is relevant to the course because it a lot of directly discusses sport marketing and sales. Tickets, food, lodging, travel, advertising, along with apparel and merchandise are all things that were used to calculate the amount of money the Super Bowl brought to the city. By carefully dissecting all of these, economists were able to get a number quite different and seemingly more credible than the NFL’s. Especially after the league would not show how they came up with their $600 million figure, this article shows that much of the money that is generated as a result of sports marketing and sales is far from the NFL’s claim.
Review by Jonathan Parker in SRM 435 (section 1)
Super Bowl XLVIII in New York was the first Super Bowl to be held in an outdoor venue. The NFL and economists are arguing if the host city earns any money for their economy from the Super Bowl and all of its events that are associated with it. Economists are saying that the host city, this year New York City, will receive very little to no money from hosting the Super Bowl. They argue that most of the spending was on the tickets, the beer, and the souvenirs associated with the game. Most of that money goes out of town with the retailers that sold these items. Also the NFL has a tax-exempt policy that allows employees working the Super Bowl to avoid any local sales tax on their food and lodging. From this policy, it was estimated that New Orleans lost around $800,000 from hosting the Super Bowl, the year before. The NFL states the economy of New York and New Jersey would see an increase of about $600 million from Super Bowl spending. The NFL’s reasoning was from the fact that more hotels and restaurants were being booked because of the Super Bowl. Also the NFL states that the host city spends a lot of money to lure the big game to their city. With the only reason for doing such, was because of the money their local economy would receive from the outside visitors.
The problem is that the NFL has not shown where they have come up with such a large number, keeping the economists skeptical. The economists fear displacement for the visitors not there for the Super Bowl, because the Super Bowl visitors would fill all of the hotels leaving other visitors to go elsewhere, but New York. The weather this year for the Super Bowl was actually a bonus because it was not during the main tourist season in New York City and from New York City, having so many hotels that it would not displace anyone regardless if they are there for the game or not. A non-NFL study showed the impact of the Super Bowl is around $30-120 million in overall spending. New York should experience around $100 million in increased revenue and a few million will be generated in the form of new taxes.
From a sports sales promotion, I think it is crazy that the NFL thinks the Super Bowl brings in $600 million for New York’s economy. I feel this way because the NFL has to get a certain percentage from all the money spent around the Super Bowl and also the vendors and sponsors for the Super Bowl would get their money as well. Meaning it would leave New York with some new money, but probably not as much as they deserve. Using a sales standpoint, I do not feel the economists see the benefit that a host city has when hosting the Super Bowl. I think the economists always take a worldly view, because they see the economy of the nation, not as a healthy entity and the fact that why would one event change the outcome of one city’s economic status. I think economists need to understand that the sports field continues to grow at an unprecedented pace and continues to attract more fans year by year. Because of this, it can cause a tremendous amount of money to be generated. Another sales point, is that the NFL makes a lot of money from merchandise, tickets, and sponsors that the host city deserves by hosting the Super Bowl. The host city spends a large amount of money in an attempt to host the game and the city that gets the game should actually see most of the revenue.
The NFL from a marketing and promotion point needs the Super Bowl Committee to release their stats a whole lot sooner than after four years have passed. I think they need to because economists, sales people, and local venues want to see the impact that the Super Bowl can have on host cities. Then they will know how to prepare and respond to the situation and see how the NFL came up with their numbers. I think the local stores and vendors would see an increase in sales and revenue because of the attendees the Super Bowl attracts. Many people spend the whole week, within the city, leading up to the game and from this they will be spending money on food, shopping, hotels, and even transportation with cabs and buses.
The article is relevant to SRM 435 because it show the 4P’s of marketing. Product is the Super Bowl, place is of course New York City, promotion is everywhere from TV, to social media, and price is the cost for tickets, hotels, food, and souvenirs. Also the article shows consumer behavior when it comes to dealing with the Super Bowl. It shows how the NFL feels the Super Bowl will draw in the crowds and that how host cities try to outbid each other, just for the economic opportunity that the big game can bring to an area. Finally, the article is relevant to the course in that the Super Bowl can be a money making revenue for the host city. To determine if a sports promotion is successful is determined by the revenue that it generates.
---
Review by John Boitnott in SRM 435 (section 1)
In the article Analysts: Windfalls for Super Bowl Host Overthrown, the question of how much revenue host cities of the Super Bowl actually make is brought up. The article starts by giving the NFL’s claim of how much of a boost the Super Bowl brings to a city’s economy, and then shows that the NFL would want to say that because cities spend hundreds of millions to lure the big game to them. The article goes on to explain how the league won’t reveal how they came up with the figure of how much it benefits the local economies, and uses research and quotes from professional economists to show that the average economic impact is actually around $30 million to $120 million as opposed to the $600 million figure that the NFL states.
From a sport marketing, promotions, and sales standpoint this article can surprise someone when they read that most of the money from branded items goes right back out of town. Except for the small proportion that is paid to the vendors, much of the money leaves the city once the Super Bowl leaves. The state of New York alone spent $5 million on advertising events, and when looking at how much money leaves their economy it can be called into question as to how much the costs were really worth and if the amount of revenue earned after that was actually worth the investment. If future host cities and cities vying for a bid take advice from the economists who contributed to this article, it could have a significant impact on how everything is approached. Marketing and sales strategies and schemes could be changed to make sure the revenue earned from the game stays in the area, and if enough cities collaborate together the prices of Super Bowl bids could drop unless the NFL can somehow guarantee that the city will keep a certain percentage of profits that are able to be measured.
This article is relevant to the course because it a lot of directly discusses sport marketing and sales. Tickets, food, lodging, travel, advertising, along with apparel and merchandise are all things that were used to calculate the amount of money the Super Bowl brought to the city. By carefully dissecting all of these, economists were able to get a number quite different and seemingly more credible than the NFL’s. Especially after the league would not show how they came up with their $600 million figure, this article shows that much of the money that is generated as a result of sports marketing and sales is far from the NFL’s claim.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
"Banking on Booze"
From Athletic Management
Review by Josh Hogan in SRM 435 (section 2)
Why is alcohol not sold at all college sporting events is a question that is asked by so many people and quite frankly myself as well. There is bias in my reasoning because I am a college student, but I do see a merit to this action being taken by a university. Recently the University of Toledo permitted alcohol to be sold at its football and basketball games to the public, not just luxury suites. They are doing this not only for money and sponsorship deals, but also to enhance what Mike O’Brien, athletic director, says is the “game day experience”. They have seen the merit like 22 other NCAA schools in selling alcohol. Of course the proper implications will be in use such as security, id verification, and same game day rules in general for public.
The tailgating experience is one that many people come to football games for, but sometimes abuse this. Fans know that alcohol can’t be purchased inside the stadium and may just try to abuse alcohol as much as possible before the game, then may not even go to event itself. Toledo has recognized this and many other schools are starting to see this too. You want to retain spectators at events not only for the teams support, but the longer they are at event, the higher the percentage they will spend money there. The sales of alcohol could really be a strong benefit to keep the fan at a game and for revenue of selling of alcohol. With big name sponsors coming in such as Budweiser, Coors, etc., I see the potential for bigger prizes for fans. Entertainment could increase, maybe post game shows, or fireworks can become a common theme. JMU I believe is a school that can and needs to move in this direction for the same exact reasons. With an expanding campus, high level of competition for the university, and yes the “party” tagged word for our school. I believe that JMU students wouldn’t abuse alcohol as much in tailgates because they know they can get a beer for the game. I hear it to many times from fellow students that they just want to just leave at halftime because they want to go party. It comes in unison for the home team to also be good so the fan can enjoy the game. I’m afraid that the JMU community is just afraid to take this step, but with the right message being sent to them, I believe they would shift their views.
---
Review by Tucker Koch in SRM 435 (section 2)
The article we used for our presentation focused on the idea of the University of Toledo selling alcohol at their football and basketball games. This makes them the 23rd school across the country to do so and it has been a highly controversial decision in almost every case. Toledo will add extra security to games and looks to copy the success of other schools who have seen decreased arrests on game days since allowing the sale of alcohol. Communities tend to be hesitant but schools are extremely optimistic about the possible added revenue. In some cases, like West Virginia University, revenue from alcohol sales at games can exceed one million dollars.
This relates to our class because the whole idea of selling alcohol is in essence a sales promotion to get more people to come to games. Changing the culture of a football stadium is not easy to do at any level, but especially Division I college football. Other than free t-shirts, a good halftime show or a rival opponent, it is extremely difficult to entice fans to give up a Saturday to watch a struggling team. That’s why in the current state, it seems the emphasis to the students is put on the tailgate and not the game itself. The amount of students who tailgate but don’t go into the games at JMU seems to increase every year. In the case of JMU, selling alcohol at the games might entice more people to go to the game, stay past halftime and thus increase the game day experience and atmosphere. With an increased fan presence maybe the team will start playing better at home and then the program becomes one that students and athletes love being a part of.
Review by Josh Hogan in SRM 435 (section 2)
Why is alcohol not sold at all college sporting events is a question that is asked by so many people and quite frankly myself as well. There is bias in my reasoning because I am a college student, but I do see a merit to this action being taken by a university. Recently the University of Toledo permitted alcohol to be sold at its football and basketball games to the public, not just luxury suites. They are doing this not only for money and sponsorship deals, but also to enhance what Mike O’Brien, athletic director, says is the “game day experience”. They have seen the merit like 22 other NCAA schools in selling alcohol. Of course the proper implications will be in use such as security, id verification, and same game day rules in general for public.
The tailgating experience is one that many people come to football games for, but sometimes abuse this. Fans know that alcohol can’t be purchased inside the stadium and may just try to abuse alcohol as much as possible before the game, then may not even go to event itself. Toledo has recognized this and many other schools are starting to see this too. You want to retain spectators at events not only for the teams support, but the longer they are at event, the higher the percentage they will spend money there. The sales of alcohol could really be a strong benefit to keep the fan at a game and for revenue of selling of alcohol. With big name sponsors coming in such as Budweiser, Coors, etc., I see the potential for bigger prizes for fans. Entertainment could increase, maybe post game shows, or fireworks can become a common theme. JMU I believe is a school that can and needs to move in this direction for the same exact reasons. With an expanding campus, high level of competition for the university, and yes the “party” tagged word for our school. I believe that JMU students wouldn’t abuse alcohol as much in tailgates because they know they can get a beer for the game. I hear it to many times from fellow students that they just want to just leave at halftime because they want to go party. It comes in unison for the home team to also be good so the fan can enjoy the game. I’m afraid that the JMU community is just afraid to take this step, but with the right message being sent to them, I believe they would shift their views.
---
Review by Tucker Koch in SRM 435 (section 2)
The article we used for our presentation focused on the idea of the University of Toledo selling alcohol at their football and basketball games. This makes them the 23rd school across the country to do so and it has been a highly controversial decision in almost every case. Toledo will add extra security to games and looks to copy the success of other schools who have seen decreased arrests on game days since allowing the sale of alcohol. Communities tend to be hesitant but schools are extremely optimistic about the possible added revenue. In some cases, like West Virginia University, revenue from alcohol sales at games can exceed one million dollars.
This relates to our class because the whole idea of selling alcohol is in essence a sales promotion to get more people to come to games. Changing the culture of a football stadium is not easy to do at any level, but especially Division I college football. Other than free t-shirts, a good halftime show or a rival opponent, it is extremely difficult to entice fans to give up a Saturday to watch a struggling team. That’s why in the current state, it seems the emphasis to the students is put on the tailgate and not the game itself. The amount of students who tailgate but don’t go into the games at JMU seems to increase every year. In the case of JMU, selling alcohol at the games might entice more people to go to the game, stay past halftime and thus increase the game day experience and atmosphere. With an increased fan presence maybe the team will start playing better at home and then the program becomes one that students and athletes love being a part of.
"Florida Gulf Coast Still Benefitting from Sweet 16 Run"
From Athletic Business
Review by Shane Eachus in KIN 501
There are a number of sports marketing objectives that are a constant focus for collegiate athletics departments. The most prominent objective in major college athletics marketing often times is to grow the athletics brand and to increase notoriety for the university. The 2013 NCAA men’s basketball tournament saw a #15 seed, Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU), advance to the sweet 16 round of the tournament for the first time in tournament history; FGCU became a social media marvel and a Cinderella story for the ages thanks to their rise from obscurity via high flying basketball and a social media explosion. Following an opening round upset of perennial power and #2 seed, Georgetown University, and in particular following a series of highlight reel dunks and alley oops, a twitter account posted a message stating that previously unknown Florida Gulf Coast University must be located in “Dunk City, Florida.” The nickname “Dunk City” quickly caught on and FGCU became characterized by both their style of play and their carefree fun loving attitude, both of which were pointed to in the newly acquired nickname and marketing campaign. Less than 5 hours after the Georgetown game had ended, a music video had been created that would soon go viral referring to FGCU’s basketball team, affectionately referring to the team as Dunk City. Following the game and the popularity explosion of the video, dunk city tee shirts were made, dunk city video packages were produced by CBS and ESPN was featuring the program on SportsCenter.
To date, FGCU athletics is still utilizing the “Dunk City” moniker. Every copy of the 2013-2014 season media guide possesses a QR code that can be scanned by iPhone and android devices, bringing about a mobile highlight tape consisting of every dunk from the previous year and a half of FGCU basketball. Fans at the institution, as well as in surrounding southwest Florida, have jumped on board with the FGCU, which opened only 17 years ago. A constant objective of sports marketing is to grow the fan base, or increase the number of individuals who recognize and identify with a particular team. Through a number of statistics, including a 415% rise in merchandise sales, and a 154% increase in season ticket sales, we can see that these types of behaviors have certainly grown at FGCU. The primary end result of the dunk city marketing campaign was described as “transformational” by FGCU athletics director Kevin Kavanagh; notoriety for the less than 20 year old university has truly spiked following the dunk city campaign during the 2013 NCAA tournament. One professor who was spending time over the 2013 summer in China reported being approached on the street as a response to his FGCU apparel with only the words “dunk city” being exclaimed at him; university officials even go as far as to praise the 2013 NCAA tournament success and exposure as being the primary reason for the schools admissions application hike (a 35% increase in applications for undergraduate enrollment from 2013-2014).
In the context of sports marketing the athletics department at Florida Gulf Coast University struck gold via another individual’s social media post; without the tweet referring to “Dunk City, Florida” the school’s successful marketing of the basketball program may have never taken off. However, the athletics department displayed a brilliant strategy of building off of a team’s success to produce a monumentally successful advertising campaign. Dunk city was clearly a monumentally successful sports marketing campaign in that it helped to increase the fan base and increase fan behavior/activity. More so, the dunk city marketing campaign extended beyond sports, the sports marketing campaign extended into the institutional realm helping to improve the national and international face of an entire fledgling university. Dunk City has become the brand of FGCU basketball, thanks to the University’s acceptance and promotion of the ad campaign. The catchy and proper fitting nickname helped bring about massive positive changes; in this instance, the relevance and popularity of the nickname or moniker simply made the ad campaign.
There are a number of sports marketing objectives that are a constant focus for collegiate athletics departments. The most prominent objective in major college athletics marketing often times is to grow the athletics brand and to increase notoriety for the university. The 2013 NCAA men’s basketball tournament saw a #15 seed, Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU), advance to the sweet 16 round of the tournament for the first time in tournament history; FGCU became a social media marvel and a Cinderella story for the ages thanks to their rise from obscurity via high flying basketball and a social media explosion. Following an opening round upset of perennial power and #2 seed, Georgetown University, and in particular following a series of highlight reel dunks and alley oops, a twitter account posted a message stating that previously unknown Florida Gulf Coast University must be located in “Dunk City, Florida.” The nickname “Dunk City” quickly caught on and FGCU became characterized by both their style of play and their carefree fun loving attitude, both of which were pointed to in the newly acquired nickname and marketing campaign. Less than 5 hours after the Georgetown game had ended, a music video had been created that would soon go viral referring to FGCU’s basketball team, affectionately referring to the team as Dunk City. Following the game and the popularity explosion of the video, dunk city tee shirts were made, dunk city video packages were produced by CBS and ESPN was featuring the program on SportsCenter.
To date, FGCU athletics is still utilizing the “Dunk City” moniker. Every copy of the 2013-2014 season media guide possesses a QR code that can be scanned by iPhone and android devices, bringing about a mobile highlight tape consisting of every dunk from the previous year and a half of FGCU basketball. Fans at the institution, as well as in surrounding southwest Florida, have jumped on board with the FGCU, which opened only 17 years ago. A constant objective of sports marketing is to grow the fan base, or increase the number of individuals who recognize and identify with a particular team. Through a number of statistics, including a 415% rise in merchandise sales, and a 154% increase in season ticket sales, we can see that these types of behaviors have certainly grown at FGCU. The primary end result of the dunk city marketing campaign was described as “transformational” by FGCU athletics director Kevin Kavanagh; notoriety for the less than 20 year old university has truly spiked following the dunk city campaign during the 2013 NCAA tournament. One professor who was spending time over the 2013 summer in China reported being approached on the street as a response to his FGCU apparel with only the words “dunk city” being exclaimed at him; university officials even go as far as to praise the 2013 NCAA tournament success and exposure as being the primary reason for the schools admissions application hike (a 35% increase in applications for undergraduate enrollment from 2013-2014).
In the context of sports marketing the athletics department at Florida Gulf Coast University struck gold via another individual’s social media post; without the tweet referring to “Dunk City, Florida” the school’s successful marketing of the basketball program may have never taken off. However, the athletics department displayed a brilliant strategy of building off of a team’s success to produce a monumentally successful advertising campaign. Dunk city was clearly a monumentally successful sports marketing campaign in that it helped to increase the fan base and increase fan behavior/activity. More so, the dunk city marketing campaign extended beyond sports, the sports marketing campaign extended into the institutional realm helping to improve the national and international face of an entire fledgling university. Dunk City has become the brand of FGCU basketball, thanks to the University’s acceptance and promotion of the ad campaign. The catchy and proper fitting nickname helped bring about massive positive changes; in this instance, the relevance and popularity of the nickname or moniker simply made the ad campaign.
Monday, February 3, 2014
"Notre Dame Announces $400M Stadium Expansion"
From Athletic Business
Review by Nick Merullo in SRM 435 (section 1)
Recently, the University of Notre Dame has announced their intentions to renovate and expand the historic Notre Dame Stadium at a cost of 400 million dollars. With a plan that current University president Rev. John Jenkins has called, “the most ambitious building project in the 172-year history of Notre Dame,” the school will be adding three to four thousand seats of “premium” seating, as well as adding three buildings to the stadium which will be centered on academics.
The expansion will feature building on the east, west and south sides of the stadium. On the west side the University plans to build an nine story, interactive student center. The new student center will also be used for campus recreation. Because of this, the old recreation facility will be transformed to a practice facility focused solely on the school’s men and women’s basketball teams in a separate project. This will allow the current press box will be torn down and placed on the east side of the stadium where it will be given a more lucrative and modern look. The new east side building will also be nine stories high, and will become the new home to the University’s anthropology and psychology departments, as well as featuring a new digital media center. A final building will be added to the south side of the stadium which will be used for hospitality purposes.
Notre Dame has yet to identify where exactly the funding will come from and hopes to begin construction next year. Jenkins has also said that the project should take nearly three years to finish. To add some perspective as to just how large the expansion will be, the article stated that Baylor University’s entirely new football stadium will cost the school 250 million dollars.
Although the brand of Notre Dame Football has consistently sold itself over the years due to its historic prestige, the school’s Athletic Director Jack Swarbick is excited about the new project. "It's such a powerful symbol given what's going on in college athletics right now, that you can take the stadium and say we believe in the integration of athletics into academics, and here's the living proof of it.” The current Notre Dame Stadium had been used solely for football purposes. With the expansion, the University will be able to market the facility from a standpoint of not just football, but also student life and academics. In an age where so much of the game day experience is based on incentives other than just the game itself, this will make the new facility unique in creating value of the stadium for today’s generation.
At the same time, the project must also take into consideration the opinions of the many football purists within the Notre Dame fan base. Because of this, the decision to refrain from any building on the stadium’s north side is key. This will prevent any obstruction of the famed mural of “Touchdown Jesus” which has long been known as a symbol of the tradition of Fighting Irish football. Although no decision has been made as to whether the playing surface will transition from natural grass to synthetic field turf, the school does intend to avoid placing any commercial advertising on its new interactive video screen scoreboard. And by combining the wants and needs of both the football purists and today’s generation of sports fans, Notre Dame may have the pieces in place for a premiere football facility.
---
Review by Luke Drayer in SRM 435 (section 1)
The University of Notre Dame’s 84 year-old stadium is getting a facelift; a $400 million dollar one. The plan to expand was released this past Wednesday by the University’s President, Rev. John Jenkins. According to Jenkins, this expansion is “the most ambitious building project in the 172-year history of Notre Dame.”
Adding between 3,000 to 4,000 premium seats plus three academic buildings on the east, west, and south wings, the stadium will now serve more than just student athletes and their fans. Two new nine story buildings will be attached to the east and west wings, the west side housing the new Student Center which includes a Rec Center and the east side becoming the new home of the anthropology and psychology departments as well as a digital media center. On the south side there will be a six-story hospitality area. "What's exciting about this project is it brings together athletics, faculty and academics, research and a student center, so it's an integrated model," Jenkins said. Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick is another proponent for this change. “It's such a powerful symbol given what's going on in college athletics right now, that you can take the stadium and say we believe in the integration of athletics into academics, and here's the living proof of it," Swarbrick said.
The integration of athletics and academics that Notre Dame is doing is really first of its kind in major college athletic programs and universities. However, by marketing it as such, it is drawing a much broader and larger crowd. Now, not just athletes and the fans will be using the stadium and its surrounding facilities, but everyday students as well. Instead of dumping millions of dollars into a facility that is used “six Saturdays a year” as stated in our video, it is now appealing to a much larger body. The integration of athletics and academics in one massive facility creates value beyond just the game day experience; it also provides a higher sense of school pride and less segregation between regular student and student-athletes.
While much of the expansion is targeting towards the younger generation of students, athletes, and fans, the University still understands its roots. Many of the Notre Dame ‘Purists’ don’t want to see their Touchdown Jesus, a long time good luck symbol for the Fighting Irish, taken down or covered up by the expansion. To see that all parties are pleased, the school has decided not to build anything on the north end of the field. Another concern of the older generation is that of having too much commercial advertising on the new scoreboard, which the school has agreed not to have.
The idea of marketing this new stadium as a multi-purpose facility that integrates both athletics and academics is brilliant and one that I think will start a trend amongst other major universities across the country. While upgrading the facility, not only are they improving the image of the football program, but also that of the university and their value on both the academic and athletic side. The school is promoting themselves as one that is well rounded and doing so with its football program at the forefront; the epitome of sports marketing.
Review by Nick Merullo in SRM 435 (section 1)
Recently, the University of Notre Dame has announced their intentions to renovate and expand the historic Notre Dame Stadium at a cost of 400 million dollars. With a plan that current University president Rev. John Jenkins has called, “the most ambitious building project in the 172-year history of Notre Dame,” the school will be adding three to four thousand seats of “premium” seating, as well as adding three buildings to the stadium which will be centered on academics.
The expansion will feature building on the east, west and south sides of the stadium. On the west side the University plans to build an nine story, interactive student center. The new student center will also be used for campus recreation. Because of this, the old recreation facility will be transformed to a practice facility focused solely on the school’s men and women’s basketball teams in a separate project. This will allow the current press box will be torn down and placed on the east side of the stadium where it will be given a more lucrative and modern look. The new east side building will also be nine stories high, and will become the new home to the University’s anthropology and psychology departments, as well as featuring a new digital media center. A final building will be added to the south side of the stadium which will be used for hospitality purposes.
Notre Dame has yet to identify where exactly the funding will come from and hopes to begin construction next year. Jenkins has also said that the project should take nearly three years to finish. To add some perspective as to just how large the expansion will be, the article stated that Baylor University’s entirely new football stadium will cost the school 250 million dollars.
Although the brand of Notre Dame Football has consistently sold itself over the years due to its historic prestige, the school’s Athletic Director Jack Swarbick is excited about the new project. "It's such a powerful symbol given what's going on in college athletics right now, that you can take the stadium and say we believe in the integration of athletics into academics, and here's the living proof of it.” The current Notre Dame Stadium had been used solely for football purposes. With the expansion, the University will be able to market the facility from a standpoint of not just football, but also student life and academics. In an age where so much of the game day experience is based on incentives other than just the game itself, this will make the new facility unique in creating value of the stadium for today’s generation.
At the same time, the project must also take into consideration the opinions of the many football purists within the Notre Dame fan base. Because of this, the decision to refrain from any building on the stadium’s north side is key. This will prevent any obstruction of the famed mural of “Touchdown Jesus” which has long been known as a symbol of the tradition of Fighting Irish football. Although no decision has been made as to whether the playing surface will transition from natural grass to synthetic field turf, the school does intend to avoid placing any commercial advertising on its new interactive video screen scoreboard. And by combining the wants and needs of both the football purists and today’s generation of sports fans, Notre Dame may have the pieces in place for a premiere football facility.
---
Review by Luke Drayer in SRM 435 (section 1)
The University of Notre Dame’s 84 year-old stadium is getting a facelift; a $400 million dollar one. The plan to expand was released this past Wednesday by the University’s President, Rev. John Jenkins. According to Jenkins, this expansion is “the most ambitious building project in the 172-year history of Notre Dame.”
Adding between 3,000 to 4,000 premium seats plus three academic buildings on the east, west, and south wings, the stadium will now serve more than just student athletes and their fans. Two new nine story buildings will be attached to the east and west wings, the west side housing the new Student Center which includes a Rec Center and the east side becoming the new home of the anthropology and psychology departments as well as a digital media center. On the south side there will be a six-story hospitality area. "What's exciting about this project is it brings together athletics, faculty and academics, research and a student center, so it's an integrated model," Jenkins said. Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick is another proponent for this change. “It's such a powerful symbol given what's going on in college athletics right now, that you can take the stadium and say we believe in the integration of athletics into academics, and here's the living proof of it," Swarbrick said.
The integration of athletics and academics that Notre Dame is doing is really first of its kind in major college athletic programs and universities. However, by marketing it as such, it is drawing a much broader and larger crowd. Now, not just athletes and the fans will be using the stadium and its surrounding facilities, but everyday students as well. Instead of dumping millions of dollars into a facility that is used “six Saturdays a year” as stated in our video, it is now appealing to a much larger body. The integration of athletics and academics in one massive facility creates value beyond just the game day experience; it also provides a higher sense of school pride and less segregation between regular student and student-athletes.
While much of the expansion is targeting towards the younger generation of students, athletes, and fans, the University still understands its roots. Many of the Notre Dame ‘Purists’ don’t want to see their Touchdown Jesus, a long time good luck symbol for the Fighting Irish, taken down or covered up by the expansion. To see that all parties are pleased, the school has decided not to build anything on the north end of the field. Another concern of the older generation is that of having too much commercial advertising on the new scoreboard, which the school has agreed not to have.
The idea of marketing this new stadium as a multi-purpose facility that integrates both athletics and academics is brilliant and one that I think will start a trend amongst other major universities across the country. While upgrading the facility, not only are they improving the image of the football program, but also that of the university and their value on both the academic and athletic side. The school is promoting themselves as one that is well rounded and doing so with its football program at the forefront; the epitome of sports marketing.
Monday, January 27, 2014
"Seahawks' Richard Sherman Gets Hounded by Media in This Perfectly Timed Ad"
From Adweek
Video from the game
Review by Becca Gibbs in SRM 435 (section 2)
This article highlights Washington Seahawks’ cornerback Richard Sherman’s recent post-game interview with Erin Andrews influencing his brand new Beats by Dre commercial. The timing of this commercial could not have been better or worse, in some opinions. After Sherman’s final play of game against the San Francisco 49ers, he screamed into Erin Andrew’s microphone “I’m the best corner in the game. When you try me with a sorry receiver like Crabtree, that’s the result you’re going to get. Don’t you ever talk about me!” (Gasper, 2014). Sports journalists and bloggers alike began writing and posting about Sherman being a thug from Compton, California.
Sherman’s Beats by Dre commercial was released the day of the NFC Championship game, the same day Colin Kaepernick’s, the 49ers quarterback, aired. When the Seahawks won, Kaepernick’s commercial was pulled and only Sherman’s would be played. Sherman had the reputation of being a thug before the championship game, but his rowdy interview reinforced this reputation. His Beats by Dre commercial promotes the adaptive noise canceling headphones with the slogan “Hear what you want”. This was the perfect pitch for Sherman because he pays no attention to the trash talkers calling him a “thug”. In the promotional standpoint, it is unclear which is being advertised more, the headphones or Sherman. The interviewers’ questions during the commercial become increasingly personal until one interviewer asks “how do you feel about your reputation as a thug?”. Although it was a relevant question, and it reflected his post-game interview, I believe that the questions were too personal and focused too much on Sherman and not enough on the product. Had Sherman been calmer during his interview with Erin Andrews, the commercial would not have gotten the attention that it has received.
Although many reporters claim that the release of this commercial was perfectly timed with Sherman’s NFC Championship game interview, I believe that the cornerback’s publicity outshined the Beats by Dre headphones. The commercial stars Sherman and only features the headphones. When promoting a new product, it is extremely important to keep the focus on whatever it is you are selling. I think Beats by Dre chose an appropriate athlete for the product, but Sherman stole the spotlight of the commercial after his interview. Although the commercial is good publicity for the Seahawks’ player, it does not promote the headphones enough.
---
Review by Amy Spring in SRM 435 (section 2)
The article in Adweek about Richard Sherman promoting Beats by Dre was a perfectly timed ad and explains why. It promoted who Richard Sherman is, who he isn’t, and the headphones that he and millions of others use. A game between two of the toughest teams, the two teams that most thought would be the final two in the Super Bowl, the San Francisco 49ers and the Seattle Seahawks was held on January 19th. That same day an ad for Beats was released and again aired the next morning on SportsCenter.
Sherman had drawn national attention for his post-game interview with Erin Andrews. He quickly became a highly talked about, controversial, player. He has had fines for trash talking on the field and after the game was played. The ironic thing about the interview and the issues people have with Sherman is one of the most intelligent and philanthropic young players in the NFL. He earned a 4.2 GPA in high school and a communication degree from Stanford University.
Although the interview was in the moment and seems to be genuinely how Sherman felt after the big play, he created a lot of hate and talk about himself. The main focus was on the interview and not on the big athletic play at the end, or how close the game was. Sherman was quoted saying, “If I’m going to get a reputation, I might as well own my reputation.” He is aware he is being talked about but is staying focused on the game and not letting the negative attention get to him.
The article discusses that the intensity of the commercial is not as strong as others in the past; however it is relevant to what Sherman has been dealing with throughout the season. The media is trying to pin him as a thug. This was all great publicity timing for Beats and Sherman teaming up since publicity is free and they were already using him in the commercial to promote the Beats.
This Sunday the Super Bowl will be played at 6:30 pm between the Seattle Seahawks and the Denver Broncos; anticipation for the result and to see how the “greatest cornerback in the game” performs, both on and off the field.
Review by Becca Gibbs in SRM 435 (section 2)
This article highlights Washington Seahawks’ cornerback Richard Sherman’s recent post-game interview with Erin Andrews influencing his brand new Beats by Dre commercial. The timing of this commercial could not have been better or worse, in some opinions. After Sherman’s final play of game against the San Francisco 49ers, he screamed into Erin Andrew’s microphone “I’m the best corner in the game. When you try me with a sorry receiver like Crabtree, that’s the result you’re going to get. Don’t you ever talk about me!” (Gasper, 2014). Sports journalists and bloggers alike began writing and posting about Sherman being a thug from Compton, California.
Sherman’s Beats by Dre commercial was released the day of the NFC Championship game, the same day Colin Kaepernick’s, the 49ers quarterback, aired. When the Seahawks won, Kaepernick’s commercial was pulled and only Sherman’s would be played. Sherman had the reputation of being a thug before the championship game, but his rowdy interview reinforced this reputation. His Beats by Dre commercial promotes the adaptive noise canceling headphones with the slogan “Hear what you want”. This was the perfect pitch for Sherman because he pays no attention to the trash talkers calling him a “thug”. In the promotional standpoint, it is unclear which is being advertised more, the headphones or Sherman. The interviewers’ questions during the commercial become increasingly personal until one interviewer asks “how do you feel about your reputation as a thug?”. Although it was a relevant question, and it reflected his post-game interview, I believe that the questions were too personal and focused too much on Sherman and not enough on the product. Had Sherman been calmer during his interview with Erin Andrews, the commercial would not have gotten the attention that it has received.
Although many reporters claim that the release of this commercial was perfectly timed with Sherman’s NFC Championship game interview, I believe that the cornerback’s publicity outshined the Beats by Dre headphones. The commercial stars Sherman and only features the headphones. When promoting a new product, it is extremely important to keep the focus on whatever it is you are selling. I think Beats by Dre chose an appropriate athlete for the product, but Sherman stole the spotlight of the commercial after his interview. Although the commercial is good publicity for the Seahawks’ player, it does not promote the headphones enough.
---
Review by Amy Spring in SRM 435 (section 2)
The article in Adweek about Richard Sherman promoting Beats by Dre was a perfectly timed ad and explains why. It promoted who Richard Sherman is, who he isn’t, and the headphones that he and millions of others use. A game between two of the toughest teams, the two teams that most thought would be the final two in the Super Bowl, the San Francisco 49ers and the Seattle Seahawks was held on January 19th. That same day an ad for Beats was released and again aired the next morning on SportsCenter.
Sherman had drawn national attention for his post-game interview with Erin Andrews. He quickly became a highly talked about, controversial, player. He has had fines for trash talking on the field and after the game was played. The ironic thing about the interview and the issues people have with Sherman is one of the most intelligent and philanthropic young players in the NFL. He earned a 4.2 GPA in high school and a communication degree from Stanford University.
Although the interview was in the moment and seems to be genuinely how Sherman felt after the big play, he created a lot of hate and talk about himself. The main focus was on the interview and not on the big athletic play at the end, or how close the game was. Sherman was quoted saying, “If I’m going to get a reputation, I might as well own my reputation.” He is aware he is being talked about but is staying focused on the game and not letting the negative attention get to him.
The article discusses that the intensity of the commercial is not as strong as others in the past; however it is relevant to what Sherman has been dealing with throughout the season. The media is trying to pin him as a thug. This was all great publicity timing for Beats and Sherman teaming up since publicity is free and they were already using him in the commercial to promote the Beats.
This Sunday the Super Bowl will be played at 6:30 pm between the Seattle Seahawks and the Denver Broncos; anticipation for the result and to see how the “greatest cornerback in the game” performs, both on and off the field.
"The Connected Fan"
From Adweek
Review by Ryan Dixon in SRM 435 (section 1)
“Competing with the couch”, as this article talks mostly about connecting with the fans through social media and ways to get fans attention while at the game there are still some people out there that would rather enjoy watching a game “on the couch.” Stadiums and ballparks are thinking of more creative ways to get the fans engaged not just into the game but into what’s going on around the game. Places like the seats, at the concession lines, or even on the big screen scoreboard. While some stadiums are more technologically advanced than others, they are still trying to rebuild and revamp to get the game day experience more live and exciting.
The way this article ties into this course is that without all the new technology that is being added to the stadiums people wont want to come and watch games in person anymore. They will rather sit at home and be able to get the same experience that they would at the games. That’s why companies are coming together and thinking of ways to get fans to come to the games. With adding new technology to stadiums fans will see that and know they are getting a better experience than they would on their couch. Without fans coming to view the games in person you wont have sales and marketing promotions for other companies and even for your stadium itself. Fans want that wired environment; have free WiFi so their videos or pictures upload quicker onto their social medias. During games you have trivia presented by a certain company that does promotions for the team. While a game is on time out you may have a chance to get and upgrade seat exchange by answering the trivia question right. Its things like this that make fan want to come to the games in person. I feel bad for someone who has never been to an actual stadium to watch a game in person. I know many people say they would rather watch games on a HD TV but I don’t know what is more HD than our own eyes and experiencing everything first hand.
---
Review by Cody Fazenbaker in SRM 435 (section 1)
With the emergence of advanced technology, the viewing experience of sporting events is changing drastically. Ten years ago, the action of the game was what drove fans to come watch. Now, with the creation of smartphones and Wi-Fi, it is all about the fan experience. Fans are not as motivated to attend sporting events live as they were years ago because of the convenience of watching multiple games from several angles from the comfort of their own home. Sports organizations are “competing with the couch” and fighting to give fans an irreplaceable fan experience in order to keep fans coming back.
Studies have shown that more than half of sports fans would rather watch a game from their own home than attend the game live. The Barclays Center, home of the Brooklyn Nets, is one example of a venue that is providing that at-home experience. The addition of Wi-Fi, 4G LTE coverage, and the ability to order food from your own seats are just some of the many amenities that give fans a high-tech experience. Because the value of being at the game does not mean as much as it did years ago, sports organizations and marketers must find ways to appeal to our digital generation. Dallas Stadium, home of the Dallas Cowboys, installed an HD center-hung scoreboard that measures 72 feet by 160 feet. The Miami Marlins encourage fans to tweet difference team references before and during the game in order to get their tweets up on the scoreboard. Kansas City’s MLS soccer team asks fans to participate in games on their smartphones with incentives being things such as seat upgrades. The ultimate goal of these organizations now is to have fans arrive to the game earlier, stay longer, and spend more. Knowing what your fans want is more important than ever.
This article is relevant to our marketing and advertising class because those two things are more important than ever in the sports business world. In order to keep fans coming back to attend games live rather than have them watch from home, sport marketers and advertisers must be more creative than ever. It is all about connecting with the fan and personalizing their experience.
Review by Ryan Dixon in SRM 435 (section 1)
“Competing with the couch”, as this article talks mostly about connecting with the fans through social media and ways to get fans attention while at the game there are still some people out there that would rather enjoy watching a game “on the couch.” Stadiums and ballparks are thinking of more creative ways to get the fans engaged not just into the game but into what’s going on around the game. Places like the seats, at the concession lines, or even on the big screen scoreboard. While some stadiums are more technologically advanced than others, they are still trying to rebuild and revamp to get the game day experience more live and exciting.
The way this article ties into this course is that without all the new technology that is being added to the stadiums people wont want to come and watch games in person anymore. They will rather sit at home and be able to get the same experience that they would at the games. That’s why companies are coming together and thinking of ways to get fans to come to the games. With adding new technology to stadiums fans will see that and know they are getting a better experience than they would on their couch. Without fans coming to view the games in person you wont have sales and marketing promotions for other companies and even for your stadium itself. Fans want that wired environment; have free WiFi so their videos or pictures upload quicker onto their social medias. During games you have trivia presented by a certain company that does promotions for the team. While a game is on time out you may have a chance to get and upgrade seat exchange by answering the trivia question right. Its things like this that make fan want to come to the games in person. I feel bad for someone who has never been to an actual stadium to watch a game in person. I know many people say they would rather watch games on a HD TV but I don’t know what is more HD than our own eyes and experiencing everything first hand.
---
Review by Cody Fazenbaker in SRM 435 (section 1)
With the emergence of advanced technology, the viewing experience of sporting events is changing drastically. Ten years ago, the action of the game was what drove fans to come watch. Now, with the creation of smartphones and Wi-Fi, it is all about the fan experience. Fans are not as motivated to attend sporting events live as they were years ago because of the convenience of watching multiple games from several angles from the comfort of their own home. Sports organizations are “competing with the couch” and fighting to give fans an irreplaceable fan experience in order to keep fans coming back.
Studies have shown that more than half of sports fans would rather watch a game from their own home than attend the game live. The Barclays Center, home of the Brooklyn Nets, is one example of a venue that is providing that at-home experience. The addition of Wi-Fi, 4G LTE coverage, and the ability to order food from your own seats are just some of the many amenities that give fans a high-tech experience. Because the value of being at the game does not mean as much as it did years ago, sports organizations and marketers must find ways to appeal to our digital generation. Dallas Stadium, home of the Dallas Cowboys, installed an HD center-hung scoreboard that measures 72 feet by 160 feet. The Miami Marlins encourage fans to tweet difference team references before and during the game in order to get their tweets up on the scoreboard. Kansas City’s MLS soccer team asks fans to participate in games on their smartphones with incentives being things such as seat upgrades. The ultimate goal of these organizations now is to have fans arrive to the game earlier, stay longer, and spend more. Knowing what your fans want is more important than ever.
This article is relevant to our marketing and advertising class because those two things are more important than ever in the sports business world. In order to keep fans coming back to attend games live rather than have them watch from home, sport marketers and advertisers must be more creative than ever. It is all about connecting with the fan and personalizing their experience.
"Are you more likely to buy athlete-endorsed food products?"
From Philly.com
Review by Nick Kusko in KIN 501
The article explored the significant influence celebrity athletes have on their audience, with a specific focus on the promotion of “junk food.” It was discussed that the most susceptible population were adolescents, which could be a contributing factor to childhood obesity and Type-II Diabetes. As a conclusion, it was noted that a shift should be made in having these same influential athletes promoting healthier and more nutritious options to today’s youth.
There were two main conclusions that resulted from the article. The first of which was that professional athletes would always have a strong influence over audiences. The majority of athletes are positive role models, and in return, followers (especially youth) will be drawn to products and services they represent. The article provided a historic example of Babe Ruth and Ted Williams promoting cigarettes in the 20th century (Dahlsgaard, 2013). Today’s athletes could obviously not promote tobacco products in today’s society, but it is a similar concept of making universally less desirable products seem acceptable or “cool.” Athletes have historically been spokesmen (or spokeswomen) for products, and this will most likely never change.
The second main conclusion, which was related to the first one, was that professional athletes’ have a “brainwashing” effect. They have the ability to make any object or food seem needed, because they endorse it in an advertisement. As the article suggested, would a child be tempted to eat an Oreo just because Peyton Manning tells them to? Unfortunately, the answer for most would be yes. As the article implied, this undeniable power should be harnessed and used to portray a positive message of healthier eating and exercise in attempt to combat childhood (and adulthood) obesity.
This article is relevant to the course as celebrity endorsements are a large component of sports marketing. These advertisements are heavily used in the media and strategically placed for specific audiences. The marketing industry would be a completely different world if professional athletes had no role in the promotion of the most popular brands, products and foods. Some would even suggest that such a concept is unfathomable in today’s multimedia domain.
Review by Nick Kusko in KIN 501
The article explored the significant influence celebrity athletes have on their audience, with a specific focus on the promotion of “junk food.” It was discussed that the most susceptible population were adolescents, which could be a contributing factor to childhood obesity and Type-II Diabetes. As a conclusion, it was noted that a shift should be made in having these same influential athletes promoting healthier and more nutritious options to today’s youth.
There were two main conclusions that resulted from the article. The first of which was that professional athletes would always have a strong influence over audiences. The majority of athletes are positive role models, and in return, followers (especially youth) will be drawn to products and services they represent. The article provided a historic example of Babe Ruth and Ted Williams promoting cigarettes in the 20th century (Dahlsgaard, 2013). Today’s athletes could obviously not promote tobacco products in today’s society, but it is a similar concept of making universally less desirable products seem acceptable or “cool.” Athletes have historically been spokesmen (or spokeswomen) for products, and this will most likely never change.
The second main conclusion, which was related to the first one, was that professional athletes’ have a “brainwashing” effect. They have the ability to make any object or food seem needed, because they endorse it in an advertisement. As the article suggested, would a child be tempted to eat an Oreo just because Peyton Manning tells them to? Unfortunately, the answer for most would be yes. As the article implied, this undeniable power should be harnessed and used to portray a positive message of healthier eating and exercise in attempt to combat childhood (and adulthood) obesity.
This article is relevant to the course as celebrity endorsements are a large component of sports marketing. These advertisements are heavily used in the media and strategically placed for specific audiences. The marketing industry would be a completely different world if professional athletes had no role in the promotion of the most popular brands, products and foods. Some would even suggest that such a concept is unfathomable in today’s multimedia domain.
"How Marketers Can Bring Their A-Game to the Super Bowl"
From Ad Age
Review by Graham Sharples in SRM 435 (section 1)
As the Super bowl is fast approaching, many fans look forward to the commercials just as much as the big game. On January 22, 2014, Ad Age, wrote a special report on the super bowl and how revealing ads throughout the duration of the super bowl can either make or break marketers careers. The article noted that in order to be successful on the “big day,” marketers should be prepared to spend on average $6 million to $10 million but also to start focusing on their advertisement at least eight months in advance. The article focuses a lot on the planning for the one-day debut rather than just the advertisement itself. It was also stated in the article that “marketers now plan when and how they announce they bought a super bowl spot” and how that has become a part of a mini-marketing plan because of all the media interest surrounding it (McCarthy, 2014).
Super bowl Sunday has grown to be one of the most watched broadcasts and sporting events in the United States. Companies are quick to take advantage of the built-in audience to showcase their products and innovative ad campaigns. It is an unprecedented opportunity and a huge moment in sports and advertising.
This article relates to this course because the course relies heavily on the principles of promotions and marketing in the sports industry. The article analyzes the key to being a successful advertiser during a big event such as the super bowl. The class deals a lot with promotions and advertising and this is exactly what the article described. This article also recognizes the importance of preparation and marketing strategies in order to be profitable.
---
Review by Matt Williams in SRM 435 (section 1)
My article review will be on advertisements and marketing on the Superbowl ads. This opportunity for companies around the world is something they spend months and millions of dollars on. And this marketing prime time only comes around once a year therefore creates high stakes, money and time invested in these precious ad times. If your company is not willing to spend 6-10 million dollars Adam Komack chief client officer at Mediacom does not recommend you make this steep commitment just for a 30 second airtime. The Superbowl has become much more than a football game in our country it is practically a national holiday millions of people around the world watch the game football fan or not. The Super Bowl is the only time a year when marketers are guaranteed millions of people will be watching. Social media has impacted the marketing as well people sent out 26.1 million tweets during the game. This is exactly the attention that these companies want to generate consumers talking about their commercials and products. The after shock that these 30-60 seconds create is the key not just owning that add spot but having people talk about your add next week at work. Then the companies should offer some sort of retail event following the ad “to capitalize on all the noise the brand has made” Komack says. This opportunity to capture millions of peoples only comes once a year. This is why companies spend millions of dollars and fight for the most talked about ad for a reason. It works the most prosperous companies in the world shuffle ads out on this day. Marketers around the world take note on the messages and tactics made to try and make the best ad of year. This isn't only the National Football Leagues championship I believe this is also the title match for the marketing world. On one of the biggest stages of world a mega event when is their better time to take advantage of this marketing time.
Review by Graham Sharples in SRM 435 (section 1)
As the Super bowl is fast approaching, many fans look forward to the commercials just as much as the big game. On January 22, 2014, Ad Age, wrote a special report on the super bowl and how revealing ads throughout the duration of the super bowl can either make or break marketers careers. The article noted that in order to be successful on the “big day,” marketers should be prepared to spend on average $6 million to $10 million but also to start focusing on their advertisement at least eight months in advance. The article focuses a lot on the planning for the one-day debut rather than just the advertisement itself. It was also stated in the article that “marketers now plan when and how they announce they bought a super bowl spot” and how that has become a part of a mini-marketing plan because of all the media interest surrounding it (McCarthy, 2014).
Super bowl Sunday has grown to be one of the most watched broadcasts and sporting events in the United States. Companies are quick to take advantage of the built-in audience to showcase their products and innovative ad campaigns. It is an unprecedented opportunity and a huge moment in sports and advertising.
This article relates to this course because the course relies heavily on the principles of promotions and marketing in the sports industry. The article analyzes the key to being a successful advertiser during a big event such as the super bowl. The class deals a lot with promotions and advertising and this is exactly what the article described. This article also recognizes the importance of preparation and marketing strategies in order to be profitable.
---
Review by Matt Williams in SRM 435 (section 1)
My article review will be on advertisements and marketing on the Superbowl ads. This opportunity for companies around the world is something they spend months and millions of dollars on. And this marketing prime time only comes around once a year therefore creates high stakes, money and time invested in these precious ad times. If your company is not willing to spend 6-10 million dollars Adam Komack chief client officer at Mediacom does not recommend you make this steep commitment just for a 30 second airtime. The Superbowl has become much more than a football game in our country it is practically a national holiday millions of people around the world watch the game football fan or not. The Super Bowl is the only time a year when marketers are guaranteed millions of people will be watching. Social media has impacted the marketing as well people sent out 26.1 million tweets during the game. This is exactly the attention that these companies want to generate consumers talking about their commercials and products. The after shock that these 30-60 seconds create is the key not just owning that add spot but having people talk about your add next week at work. Then the companies should offer some sort of retail event following the ad “to capitalize on all the noise the brand has made” Komack says. This opportunity to capture millions of peoples only comes once a year. This is why companies spend millions of dollars and fight for the most talked about ad for a reason. It works the most prosperous companies in the world shuffle ads out on this day. Marketers around the world take note on the messages and tactics made to try and make the best ad of year. This isn't only the National Football Leagues championship I believe this is also the title match for the marketing world. On one of the biggest stages of world a mega event when is their better time to take advantage of this marketing time.
"America's Largest Spectator Sport Is Finally Embracing Digital"
From Adweek
Video 1
Video 2
Review by Kelsey Holmes in KIN 501
In 2013, NASCAR re-gained its digital rights from Turner Sports allowing them to control their own website, NASCAR.com and better integrate their digital media presence with social media. Senior Marketing Partner, Andrew Campagnone admitted, “We were behind in the technology space.” While other professional leagues, such as the NBA and NFL, were using technology and social media to take fan interaction to a whole new level NASCAR was falling behind.
In 2013, NASCAR, America’s largest Spectator Sport, began working to increase their digital media presence. 5 weeks after their new campaign launch, Nascar added 25,000 Facebook fans, 20,000 Twitter followers, 46,00 YouTube subscribers, and 1000 Instagram followers. As of January 27th, 2014 those numbers were up to a total of 583,00 Facebook fans, 1.33M Twitter followers, 52,000 YouTube subscribers, and 94,000 Instagram followers. Their current marketing strategy includes; pulling together the Nascar brand, teams drivers, fans, and sponsors to cheer on their favorite cars and drivers through the use of the hash tag #Whatdriversneed across all of their social sites. The current campaign focuses on the use of Twitter and Instagram while Nascar.com, Facebook, TV, radio, and print playing supporting roles. The new campaign seems to be helping NASCAR reach their fans as they have seen increase on all of their digital media platforms. Along with the new campaign came the innovative Fan and Media Engagement center. This center allows NASCAR professionals to stay up to date on trends and happenings on social media. Also, the center analyzes data and then adapts to better serve the fans.
While some leagues steer their athletes away from social media in fear that it will damage their brand, NASCAR is doing quite the opposite. NASCAR has very lose rules on social media and race day tweeting, and that helps to give them a competitive advantage over other sports that monitor their athletes so heavily. NASCAR vice president Steve O’donell says “it’s one of the cool things about our sport. We feel like social media gives us that direct access to some of race fans”. The more interaction fans have the more interested they become, and the bigger the interest the more likely they are to come to a race, which is what NASCAR ultimately wants. NASCAR already has a cult following and social media allows their fans to engage even more. NASCAR themselves have said they want to bring fans as close to the driver seat as possible, which is done through Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
A survey of 1,500 adults in October 2012 found that 54% of avid fans said they visit social media sites regularly for NASCAR content and that percentage jumps to 78% for 18-34 year old fans. This is great for building your brand when you can reach most of your fans through digital media. With social media you can reach new fans and gain a bigger audience especially children and college age consumers where NASCAR fans are most lacking. The push in digital media can help build the star power of your drivers by letting fans interact with them intimately and more often. Most NASCAR tracks are now installing wifi, to improve the racetrack experience, allowing fans to tweet or post about their day at the track. By engaging fans on a regular basis NASCAR digital media push is helping to build the NASCAR brand for today and the future.
As a sports marketing professional it is important to realize that social media, when used properly, is a great tool and can always be used to your advantage. Digital media plays an integral part in building your brand in today’s society. Staying up on recent trends allows the company to remain relevant at all times. Knowing how to actively engage fans with the company will definitely pay off in the long run.
Video 1
Video 2
Review by Kelsey Holmes in KIN 501
In 2013, NASCAR re-gained its digital rights from Turner Sports allowing them to control their own website, NASCAR.com and better integrate their digital media presence with social media. Senior Marketing Partner, Andrew Campagnone admitted, “We were behind in the technology space.” While other professional leagues, such as the NBA and NFL, were using technology and social media to take fan interaction to a whole new level NASCAR was falling behind.
In 2013, NASCAR, America’s largest Spectator Sport, began working to increase their digital media presence. 5 weeks after their new campaign launch, Nascar added 25,000 Facebook fans, 20,000 Twitter followers, 46,00 YouTube subscribers, and 1000 Instagram followers. As of January 27th, 2014 those numbers were up to a total of 583,00 Facebook fans, 1.33M Twitter followers, 52,000 YouTube subscribers, and 94,000 Instagram followers. Their current marketing strategy includes; pulling together the Nascar brand, teams drivers, fans, and sponsors to cheer on their favorite cars and drivers through the use of the hash tag #Whatdriversneed across all of their social sites. The current campaign focuses on the use of Twitter and Instagram while Nascar.com, Facebook, TV, radio, and print playing supporting roles. The new campaign seems to be helping NASCAR reach their fans as they have seen increase on all of their digital media platforms. Along with the new campaign came the innovative Fan and Media Engagement center. This center allows NASCAR professionals to stay up to date on trends and happenings on social media. Also, the center analyzes data and then adapts to better serve the fans.
While some leagues steer their athletes away from social media in fear that it will damage their brand, NASCAR is doing quite the opposite. NASCAR has very lose rules on social media and race day tweeting, and that helps to give them a competitive advantage over other sports that monitor their athletes so heavily. NASCAR vice president Steve O’donell says “it’s one of the cool things about our sport. We feel like social media gives us that direct access to some of race fans”. The more interaction fans have the more interested they become, and the bigger the interest the more likely they are to come to a race, which is what NASCAR ultimately wants. NASCAR already has a cult following and social media allows their fans to engage even more. NASCAR themselves have said they want to bring fans as close to the driver seat as possible, which is done through Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
A survey of 1,500 adults in October 2012 found that 54% of avid fans said they visit social media sites regularly for NASCAR content and that percentage jumps to 78% for 18-34 year old fans. This is great for building your brand when you can reach most of your fans through digital media. With social media you can reach new fans and gain a bigger audience especially children and college age consumers where NASCAR fans are most lacking. The push in digital media can help build the star power of your drivers by letting fans interact with them intimately and more often. Most NASCAR tracks are now installing wifi, to improve the racetrack experience, allowing fans to tweet or post about their day at the track. By engaging fans on a regular basis NASCAR digital media push is helping to build the NASCAR brand for today and the future.
As a sports marketing professional it is important to realize that social media, when used properly, is a great tool and can always be used to your advantage. Digital media plays an integral part in building your brand in today’s society. Staying up on recent trends allows the company to remain relevant at all times. Knowing how to actively engage fans with the company will definitely pay off in the long run.
"Peyton Manning's 'Omaha! Omaha!' Snap Count Creates Most Random Tourism Marketing Ever"
From Adweek
Review by Candynce Boney in KIN 501
During the San Diego vs. Denver NFL playoff game, quarterback Peyton Manning yelled out the play “Omaha Omaha” numerous times during the game before the ball was snapped back to him. During the game “Omaha” became a trending topic on twitter, with the tourism marketers of Omaha Nebraska tweeting “we certainly appreciate all the love from Peyton Manning #Omaha”. Marketing for tourism weren’t the only ones which saw the opportunity with Peyton’s “Omaha” play, “Omaha Steaks” also saw this as an opportunity to promote their restaurants name. One buffet in particular Omaha’s Warren Buffet is hoping for a promotional commercial from Peyton once the season comes to an end.
This is great marketing not only for Peyton Manning but the Bronco franchise as an entity. With Nebraska not having a home NFL team, marketers for the Broncos can use this as an opportunity to increase their fan base. Slowly starting with Peyton doing commercials in different businesses in Omaha, as the team and corporation begin to gain recognition in that part of the country they can begin to incorporate different athletes in their press. As sports marketers we can start to see how much social media can improve marketing abilities. With Twitter and Instagram being so popular in this day and age, sports marketers can use these tools to reach crowds all across the country, possibly other countries depending on the sport(s).
As a recent graduate with aspirations of going into sports marketing, whether it is for a professional team or a college team, it is important to stay up to date with the evolution of technology. Many times the most efficient way to reach a crowd is through social media or the Internet. A sports marketer should be able to follow the trending topics on twitter and decide whether they can relate that topic back to their company in a positive way, this will allow you to stay up to date with the constantly changing fads.
Realistically speaking, social media isn’t always the best route to take. There is also a possibility of social media hurting your company or organization more than it could help. For instance Stephanie Rice, an Olympic swimmer was criticized for a picture she posted on Instagram in a swimsuit. Which is pretty interesting because her career revolves around wearing a swimsuit. As a sport’s marketer it is important to understand the vision of your organization, doing something in the public eye that does not correspond with your company or organizations mission can be detrimental to a reputation. Therefore it is important to know how to reconcile any social issues that may arise with any of your athletes at any time during the year.
Review by Candynce Boney in KIN 501
During the San Diego vs. Denver NFL playoff game, quarterback Peyton Manning yelled out the play “Omaha Omaha” numerous times during the game before the ball was snapped back to him. During the game “Omaha” became a trending topic on twitter, with the tourism marketers of Omaha Nebraska tweeting “we certainly appreciate all the love from Peyton Manning #Omaha”. Marketing for tourism weren’t the only ones which saw the opportunity with Peyton’s “Omaha” play, “Omaha Steaks” also saw this as an opportunity to promote their restaurants name. One buffet in particular Omaha’s Warren Buffet is hoping for a promotional commercial from Peyton once the season comes to an end.
This is great marketing not only for Peyton Manning but the Bronco franchise as an entity. With Nebraska not having a home NFL team, marketers for the Broncos can use this as an opportunity to increase their fan base. Slowly starting with Peyton doing commercials in different businesses in Omaha, as the team and corporation begin to gain recognition in that part of the country they can begin to incorporate different athletes in their press. As sports marketers we can start to see how much social media can improve marketing abilities. With Twitter and Instagram being so popular in this day and age, sports marketers can use these tools to reach crowds all across the country, possibly other countries depending on the sport(s).
As a recent graduate with aspirations of going into sports marketing, whether it is for a professional team or a college team, it is important to stay up to date with the evolution of technology. Many times the most efficient way to reach a crowd is through social media or the Internet. A sports marketer should be able to follow the trending topics on twitter and decide whether they can relate that topic back to their company in a positive way, this will allow you to stay up to date with the constantly changing fads.
Realistically speaking, social media isn’t always the best route to take. There is also a possibility of social media hurting your company or organization more than it could help. For instance Stephanie Rice, an Olympic swimmer was criticized for a picture she posted on Instagram in a swimsuit. Which is pretty interesting because her career revolves around wearing a swimsuit. As a sport’s marketer it is important to understand the vision of your organization, doing something in the public eye that does not correspond with your company or organizations mission can be detrimental to a reputation. Therefore it is important to know how to reconcile any social issues that may arise with any of your athletes at any time during the year.
"Sochi Winter Olympics: Video threat emerges amid security concerns"
From CNN.com
Review by Calvin Parson, Jr. in SRM 435 (section 2)
The Winter Olympic games have been a staple in World History for over 90 years. Since 1924 athletes from around the World have gathered in one city to compete against each other in events such as skiing, figure skating, ice hockey, and curling. This year, Russia has the privilege of hosting the games for the first time in history in Sochi.
As the largest resort city in Russia, known for its resorts and sports facilities, Sochi is considered an obvious choice to host a sporting event of this magnitude. However, recent terror threats against the city, as well as civil unrest between Muslim extremist groups in the North Caucasus region of the country has provided much concern for many nations around the country who are participating in the games.
On January 20, 2014 CNN reported that a video had been posted on a Jihadi forum, and in that video, threats were being made against Sochi and specifically about a planned attack during the Olympic games. The two terrorists in the video were later identified as the suicide bombers who were responsible for attacks in Volgograd, Russia in December. The article went on to promise that regardless of the unrest in the Northern part of the country and the many attacks that have happened in Russia since Sochi was announced as the host city, that the games would be safe and that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his staff were doing everything in their power to ensure and promote safety during the games.
Unlike previous Olympic games, much of the focus this year has been taken off of the events and the athletes and placed on the threats themselves. Each day, new developments are being released regarding the attacks and what the country plans to do to keep participants and tourists safe. There is no positive “hype” surrounding these games and the nostalgia that usually comes along with the Olympics is nowhere to be found. Many people are also lashing out about Russia’s views on gay rights and how all partners of the Olympics are supporting the “Homophobic Games.”
The news surrounding the threats on the games is having an affect on many aspects of the games including the promotional elements (or lack thereof.) NBC, who is broadcasting all Olympic games through 2020, has done their due diligence to promote the athletes of the games with mini videos and commercials. However, other sponsors such as McDonalds, Samsung, Coca-Cola, and Visa have been ridiculed on social media for their partnerships with the Olympics. Ticket availability to events have also been cut in half compared to previous years games in hopes to aid security efforts. Travel has also been affected, as tourists are not allowed to fly directly into the city and hotels have been put on high security alert.
It is apparent that the threats are having a direct impact on the games and how they are being marketed and promoted in the media. Regardless if an attack occurs or not, the terror group in charge has instilled fear in the hearts of sports lovers around the world.
---
Review by Caroline Snedgear in SRM 435 (section 2)
This article addresses the recent threats specifically a video that has surfaced threatening the 2014 Winter Olympics in Russia. In the video two young men known to be involved in the suicide bombing attacks a month ago, state “we’ve prepared a present for you and all tourists who’ll come over.” These recent threats and video being released has made the public and government very concerned about the safety and security needed. Even U.S lawmakers state the games aren’t safe and wouldn’t want their families attending. This overall portrays a negative image for people traveling or thinking about attending the games. There has also been a lack of communication between the Russian and U.S. government
These threats bring up many concerns from a marketing and sales standpoint. People have already begun to boycott and this can overall affect the tickets and merchandise sales. If there is such controversy surrounding the games there is less of a chance people will want to support the games by attending this year. The city of Sochi and the Olympics in general have to make sure that they are making people aware of security and precautionary measures being put in place from a marketing standpoint for current and future concerns. With the games coming up very soon the committee will have to work very hard and make last attempts of creating a positive and safe image for the city of Sochi. The cost of the games has also risen to $45 billion where the initial budget was $12 billion due to claims that corruption was one of theses factors for pushing up the costs. Such high costs can also affect the total revenues. There has also been concern with a law that was passed outlawing “gay propaganda” where it makes it illegal to tell children about gay equality. Western leaders who have called it “archaic and discriminatory” have generally criticized this new legislation. Which has also portrayed a negative image upon the games and Russia.
The Winter Olympic games have been a staple in World History for over 90 years. Since 1924 athletes from around the World have gathered in one city to compete against each other in events such as skiing, figure skating, ice hockey, and curling. This year, Russia has the privilege of hosting the games for the first time in history in Sochi.
As the largest resort city in Russia, known for its resorts and sports facilities, Sochi is considered an obvious choice to host a sporting event of this magnitude. However, recent terror threats against the city, as well as civil unrest between Muslim extremist groups in the North Caucasus region of the country has provided much concern for many nations around the country who are participating in the games.
On January 20, 2014 CNN reported that a video had been posted on a Jihadi forum, and in that video, threats were being made against Sochi and specifically about a planned attack during the Olympic games. The two terrorists in the video were later identified as the suicide bombers who were responsible for attacks in Volgograd, Russia in December. The article went on to promise that regardless of the unrest in the Northern part of the country and the many attacks that have happened in Russia since Sochi was announced as the host city, that the games would be safe and that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his staff were doing everything in their power to ensure and promote safety during the games.
Unlike previous Olympic games, much of the focus this year has been taken off of the events and the athletes and placed on the threats themselves. Each day, new developments are being released regarding the attacks and what the country plans to do to keep participants and tourists safe. There is no positive “hype” surrounding these games and the nostalgia that usually comes along with the Olympics is nowhere to be found. Many people are also lashing out about Russia’s views on gay rights and how all partners of the Olympics are supporting the “Homophobic Games.”
The news surrounding the threats on the games is having an affect on many aspects of the games including the promotional elements (or lack thereof.) NBC, who is broadcasting all Olympic games through 2020, has done their due diligence to promote the athletes of the games with mini videos and commercials. However, other sponsors such as McDonalds, Samsung, Coca-Cola, and Visa have been ridiculed on social media for their partnerships with the Olympics. Ticket availability to events have also been cut in half compared to previous years games in hopes to aid security efforts. Travel has also been affected, as tourists are not allowed to fly directly into the city and hotels have been put on high security alert.
It is apparent that the threats are having a direct impact on the games and how they are being marketed and promoted in the media. Regardless if an attack occurs or not, the terror group in charge has instilled fear in the hearts of sports lovers around the world.
---
Review by Caroline Snedgear in SRM 435 (section 2)
This article addresses the recent threats specifically a video that has surfaced threatening the 2014 Winter Olympics in Russia. In the video two young men known to be involved in the suicide bombing attacks a month ago, state “we’ve prepared a present for you and all tourists who’ll come over.” These recent threats and video being released has made the public and government very concerned about the safety and security needed. Even U.S lawmakers state the games aren’t safe and wouldn’t want their families attending. This overall portrays a negative image for people traveling or thinking about attending the games. There has also been a lack of communication between the Russian and U.S. government
These threats bring up many concerns from a marketing and sales standpoint. People have already begun to boycott and this can overall affect the tickets and merchandise sales. If there is such controversy surrounding the games there is less of a chance people will want to support the games by attending this year. The city of Sochi and the Olympics in general have to make sure that they are making people aware of security and precautionary measures being put in place from a marketing standpoint for current and future concerns. With the games coming up very soon the committee will have to work very hard and make last attempts of creating a positive and safe image for the city of Sochi. The cost of the games has also risen to $45 billion where the initial budget was $12 billion due to claims that corruption was one of theses factors for pushing up the costs. Such high costs can also affect the total revenues. There has also been concern with a law that was passed outlawing “gay propaganda” where it makes it illegal to tell children about gay equality. Western leaders who have called it “archaic and discriminatory” have generally criticized this new legislation. Which has also portrayed a negative image upon the games and Russia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)