Internship Opportunity: Blue Ridge Sports & Entertainment

Blue Ridge Sports & Entertainment, Inc., a sporting events management company based in Winchester, Virginia is looking for one intern during the following periods: January-April, May-August, and September-December 2014. The company creates, organizes, markets, advertises, promotes and conducts on-site management while delivering local and national sponsors for events. Please click here for details on their available positions.

NFL Player Safety and the Media Effect

From ESPN.com

Analysis by Anthony Brown in SRM 334 (section 2)

A recent ESPN, Outside the Lines story, focused on a $765 million proposed concussion settlement between the NFL and its former players. The settlement concludes the NFL will pay $765 million plus legal costs, but will admit no wrongdoing. The lawsuit included over 4,500 former players, however, the settlement went beyond just those who filed suits to cover all of the league’s retired players, making the number able to receive compensation total over 18,000. The money from the settlement would go toward medical exams and concussion-related compensation for retired players and their families. In addition, $10 million will go towards medical research (Steve F. & Mark F., 2013). 

This settlement is of an incredible importance to the media. Over the course of the last decade, there has been an increased emphasis on the injuries sustained within a player’s career and how that affects their life post NFL. In the past two and a half years alone, there have been three suicides committed by former NFL players with ties to brain damage. In one instance, former Chicago Bear Dave Duerson, committed suicide with a gunshot wound to the chest so that his brain could be researched for chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). The university of Boston researchers found CTE in the brain, which is the same disease found in other deceased NFL players. This is important because it has been known over the past few years that these injuries are being caused during player’s careers but the extent has been unknown (Josh, L., Steve, A., & Joe, S., 2013). These extreme cases resulting in death have forced the media, as well as the NFL, to take a closer look. The available research has led to this settlement, which now will provide former players with funding to better assist their condition, support their families, and provide medical research not only for themselves, but for future players as well.

The NFL has not solved their player safety issues entirely. While the proper steps seem to be taking place off the field, on the field is another issue. New rules have been implemented to insure player safety, including leading with the crown of the helmet, launching into a player, and/or targeting defenseless players. Breaking these rules can result in fines and possible suspensions. However, there are many questions now as to what is legal, and what is not. Bernard Pollard, safety for the Tennessee Titans, was recently fined $42,000 for a play that was not flagged and deemed legal.

"The bad part of it is, for us as players, for the fans, for the coaches, for the refs, there's a lot of gray area. So they don't know what to call and what not to call. There's no call and now you come back and fine me $42,000 for ... a play that was legal… But like I said, if you don't want us to play defense, don't call us defense. Take us off the field. Just let them go against air. Let's see what that does to the ratings,” Pollard said.

Situations such as these are the NFL’s biggest media issue surrounding player safety. Players such as Pollard who are repeat offenders of the conduct policy continue to speak out against the policy, its effect on the game, and television ratings. The media coverage continues to focus on these player’s comments because it is a noteworthy story. There are not any players making statements about the positive aspects of the policies, just those who are negatively affected. The issue with this is that it takes away from the true meaning of the rules. The rules are being incorporated solely to focus on player safety. The media spins this into being more focused on the player, the hit, the fine, and/or the suspension. Using this instance for example, the story has no focus on the concussion the player hit received. The entire story is based on dollar amounts, ripping the NFL, and television ratings. This completely misses the point the NFL is trying to establish. Until the NFL, its players, and the media can get on the same page, all publicity surrounding these policies will continue to focus on all the penalties players receive, not the injuries the NFL is trying to prevent. This is a shame because the since the NFL has introduced these rules, the percentages of concussions have dropped tremendously. CNN reports that in 2010, there were .679 concussions per game (218 in 321 combined preseason & regular season games). In 2011, there were only .594 concussions per game (190 in 320 combined preseason & regular season games) (Library, C. 2013).

The last issue the NFL faces within the media is its own hypocrisy. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell once wrote in a letter to personnel and fans, "There is no higher priority for the National Football League than the health and wellness of our players." However, the NFL continues to insist on an 18 game schedule being implemented, more games in London being played, and Thursday night games every week. All of the desired changes are completely revenue oriented and not a bit focused on player safety. Adding more games to the schedule, shortening player preparation during the week, and adding more travel is only going to make players more susceptible to injury. The NFL is trying to have the best of both worlds. Implement safety policies to cover the league, while increase marketability to put more dollars in their pockets. It’s a very thin line that they are toying with and the media continues to cover all angles in this billion dollar industry. The NFL must be careful with their choice of words and the decisions they make going forward. Everyone is watching, not just the media, and the most prominent sports league in America has some decisions to make regarding the future of their sport. The before mentioned player suit was considered by many to be a potential demise of the league, they were able to escape that, going forward they must not be greedy and look out for the best interest of the players, not their wallets in they want to maintain credibility.

---

Analysis by Trevor Nichols in SRM 334 (section 2)

In the Outside the Lines report, written by Steve Fainaru and Mark Fainaru-Wada, details in the $765 million settlement between the NFL and former players are discussed. They highlight key parts of the settlement, including individual caps based on what type of injury a player sustained while playing football. They also discuss some players that will be left out of the settlement because the injuries occurred before 2006. The authors go on to discuss the number of brain injuries that are occurring in the NFL and the impact this has on players for the rest of their life. They close the article by describing how some lawyers may get paid multiple times.

The authors do a great job of presenting the details of the settlement and offering opinions of former players involved with the settlement. They present different quotes and thoughts from players that are both happy and unhappy with the settlement. They also dig deeper into the story when they talk about the increase in concussions and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). 52 out of 54 players who signed agreements to have their brain studied after death had CTE. Currently, it can only be tested postmortem but some doctors believe there could be a way to test and treat the disease for living athletes in the next few years. The authors also incorporate how much players will get paid based on the settlement regarding different diseases. They write that relatives of deceased players would be eligible to collect nearly 1 billion dollars, which is almost 33% more than what the settlement was agreed upon. The last part talks about how the NFL agreed to pay a “common benefit” fund for lawyers so all the settlement money could go to the players; however, within individual contracts between players and lawyers many of them already agreed upon a number at the beginning of the process. Potentially lawyers may be getting paid out multiple times by the NFL and then individual players as well. The article closes with a quote from Boyd when he talks about his frustration and how the settlement seems to not have accomplished anything and that players are back to where they started.

This is relevant to the course because it is a high profile case in the sports world. The media covering the story need to be able to present the facts to the public so the public can make their own opinion on the NFL and their take on player safety. The media always highlights big hits because that’s what makes them the most money. They also seem to only interview athletes that do not like the rule changes which may distort the opinions of the public. The media should make bigger stories out of some of these players that commit suicide and suffer from CTE. In an industry that makes 10 billion a year, they only agree on 765 million to cover players that have made them all the money. The media has the power to influence the public and they seem to only cover one side of the story.

"NFL Strikes Large-Scale Deal With Twitter To Share Highlights, Other Material"

From SportsBusiness Journal

Analysis by Brad Taake in SRM 334 (section 2)

The article we chose for our current event was about the National Football League and the well known social media site Twitter striking a deal to share highlights and other game material and statistics. The new found deal was helped to be put in place by a company that specializes in digital technology and learning technology, Amplify. Some advantages that the Twitter-verse will see is video clips from the game on Thursday nights, and as far as the Sunday and Monday games go you will still get the same amount of coverage but it will not be “live” tweeting, the highlights will be shown after the telecast is finished. Information will be concentrated primarily to Sundays, looking at fantasy football tips and other up to kickoff statistics and information.

I think what the NFL is trying to do to get media to everyone is a great idea, especially for those that cannot either go to or watch the games; however, other than the Thursday game I am not sure that fans are going to want to wait until after the telecast is over to consume all the game information. Other websites, such as ESPN or NFL, and social media might be quicker providing scores and statistics that we as the consumers are looking for right away, not until after the game is already over. Having said that, being provided with in game video clips to see the play to go along with the text in a tweet is going to be a great new way to begin staying connected to your team wherever you are. Sponsorship and ad revenues will surely see a spike within the NFL seeing as how the NFL’s twitter handle already has over 5 million followers so now companies and business will be able to reach out to these fans in a variety of ways. The NFL stated that this extra revenue was not the main factor in getting this deal done, but more so for the fans to view NFL content on their mobile phones in a completely new way.

Since social media is one of the main focus points of class it was obvious to me how this topic fits hand in hand with class. So far this article would tie in with multiple days of the lecture topics such as, Introduction to media and sport, Broadcast media, and other class discussions. Sharing the subject of Twitter and the NFL made this article fun and easy to read while also providing and innovative and potentially completely new way we consume football on the weekends.

---

Analysis by Ryan Watson in SRM 334 (section 2)

The article that we are using for our class discussion is about Twitter striking a deal with the National Football League. The main details of this deal are: Twitter has gained rights to “tweet” clips from games. They are not allowed to tweet these videos until after the games have aired on Sunday, but on Thursdays they can post the videos while the game is being played. Other than highlights, there will also be videos with fantasy tips to help fellow fantasy footballers manage their teams. Monday night football is still off limits because this is a big viewing night for the NFL. This deal is significant because the National Football League is known to be very strict about who they let have rights to their content. Twitter will most likely be putting up highlights and big plays of games so fans can easily view them at their convenience without having to deal with commercials on TV. The only thing you need to have access to these videos is a twitter account.

This deal is mutually beneficial because Twitter now gets to put videos up and the NFL can reach a bigger audience of fans with mobile phones. Twitter can also use these videos to put ads on them to generate ad revenue. Verizon is sponsoring these videos in hopes of getting more customers. At the beginning of the videos there will be a quick commercial from Verizon that is probably around eight-seconds. These quick commercials are very common on websites like YouTube and any other video sharing websites. The ad revenue will be split between Twitter and the NFL (does not give a percentage of how the revenues will be split precisely). The big benefit to the NFL is the amount of fans this is enabling to watch the videos mobile. In our world of quickly growing technology people are starting to have access to videos anywhere and everywhere. This new deal gives fans the chance to watch football highlights and fantasy tip videos on current games/players that have happened/are happening that day without having to be at home on the television. From a media/communications standpoint this is huge. In class we have constantly talked about social media and how it has helped open a new world to collaborating and giving people immediate information on breaking news. Twitter in particular gives people the chance to follow sport celebrities and famous organizations that allow them to be up to date on information. I think that we are heading towards a direction where people are going to be able to watch TV shows and other events from Twitter. We probably won’t get to watch a lot of stuff live to start out with, but if Twitter keeps heading down the path of buying rights to content, then who knows what will happen. I personally think this is really smart for Twitter because you can basically watch Football plays in real time without dealing with long commercial breaks on TV. This is also smart for Twitter because companies are having harder times reaching consumers on TV because a lot of people are using DVR to record shows, games etc. and fast forward through any commercial ads, or just going online to stream videos. With this video streaming on Twitter, people are forced to watch a short commercial before they can watch the highlight, which creates a market that companies like Verizon are jumping on. Over a four-year period Verizon is paying one billion dollars to be the exclusive “Twitter super bowl advertiser” so obviously the market for Twitter ad revenue is remarkable.

"The Los Angeles Lakers apologize for the misguided tweet sent out to commemorate the 9-11 anniversary"

From Yahoo! Sports

Analysis by Maura Gunning in SRM 334 (section 1)

On the 12th anniversary of the September 11th attacks, twitter accounts all over the country were sending out “Never Forget” and “United We Stand” tweets to show patriotism and support to those who were affected by the tragedy. The professional basketball organizations, the Los Angeles Lakers and the Phoenix Suns also sent out controversially commemorative tweets. The Lakers posted a large photo of Kobe Bryant with the words “#NEVERFORGET”, until you looked very closely there was no indication of the true meaning behind the tweet other than gaining publicity for one of the most famous players. The Phoenix Suns posted a picture of a man dressed in a gorilla suit, on a stage, waving an American flag with fireworks exploding around him in celebration. Ultimately, is it appropriate or necessary for professional sports organizations to make comments on subjects outside of sports? Social media has created the mindset that anyone is allowed to say anything they want about any subject they like. No matter how unknowledgeable, twitter, Facebook, blogs, and Instagram have made it possible for users to be the new reporters in their communities. The Lakers explained their actions by saying that the tweet was so remember the way that they commemorated the attacks during the 2001-02 season. It is more understandable that the organizations would comment on the events for any employees, family, or friends affected directly after the event but I argue that it is unnecessary for them to make a statement each year. The news sources should make statements about the anniversary of the attacks to tell us what is happening now to heighten security, about the status of the world currently, about the victim’s family and friends who are still grieving and still in recovery. There was a great story about a husband and wife who 12 years after their son’s death in the towers discovered that his last moments were spent selflessly helping others out of the building – that is a news story. Furthermore for the Suns to choose the image they did was not commemorate in the least. Their twitter image reflects the mood of a wild Fourth of July barbeque party before the firework show, not the somber, grieving day of remembrance following an American tragedy.

This article is relative to the course because of its unique nature in explaining why social media can harm an organization. Most of what we hear about social media, explains it as the next greatest thing when in reality not many people stop to think about the publicity as a danger. I think that this generation especially need to remind themselves of the phrase, “Some things are better left unsaid.” It is not necessary or credible for a basketball organization to be commenting on current world events, just as a college student like myself should not be making statements about the latest rocket science formulas used by NASA. I think that professional sports organizations would be better off to remember that they are experts in their industry, therefore if anything on another subject could be taken the wrong way in the slightest it would be best not to publically post it on any media source. The fans have so much power to interact with feedback and criticism now that professional organizations of any kind cannot risk the danger in unnecessary tweets and Facebook messages.

---

Analysis by Kara Camuso in SRM 334 (section 1)

Different teams were showing their support for the 12-year anniversary for September 11th, but some of the teams did not show it in a respectful way. The article that we chose for the current event is depicting Lakers as using the special day just to promote their team. The Lakers Twitter account tweeted a picture of Kobe Bryant with “#NeverForget”. It was supposed to show the memorial ribbon on the jersey, but when followers opened the picture Kobe was the center of the picture with a little ribbon on the side. Seeing that people were offended, they took the tweet down and wrote an apology. The Phoenix Suns also tried to show respect that day, but they failed miserably by tweeting a guy in a gorilla suit waving a flag. This showed poor judgment on their part as it seemed that they were taking the day as a publicity stunt. 

From a media standpoint, athletes/teams need to think about what they are posting on social media. As these examples show, things can be misinterpreted, and their organization can be seen as disrespectful. They think they can put anything on the Internet, but there are repercussions to offensive tweets. Also with media, things are never deleted so even though the Lakers and Suns took the tweets down people can still have access to them. Although teams and athletes are posting how they feel, the fans will give them their feedback. For example in our presentation, we show how the Broncos head coach is wearing a hat and a fan responded that the Broncos are trying to get publicity rather than remembering the day. Since these are big organizations, people look more closely at what they are posting to represent themselves. If they communicate in a poor manner, it will say a lot about their organization.

This article is relevant to the course because twitter is a big source of media that people will communicate through. If we want to go into a job with media, this article shows we have to be careful what we put on the Internet. We have to make sure it has a positive look on our organization or it could create a bad reputation. Sports Information Specialists have to choose what goes on their sites and what does not using their best judgment. This also relates back to our class because we talked about how people use technology to establish relationships. The Lakers were trying to establish a relationship with their followers but failed to do so within the way they presented the memorial tweet. Last but not least, in class we learned that organizations should know how and when to communicate, and this is a good example of why this concept is so important. The Lakers and Suns needed to know how to effectively communicate “#NeverForget”. 

Twitter is being looked over by people more and more every day. The Lakers and the Suns did not post an appropriate tweet to remember September 11th, and they more promoted themselves on the solemn day. Athletes and teams need to be careful how they post things on the Internet because their audience will react, especially by tweeting back at the organization. As students going into this profession, it is important that we know how to communicate appropriately for our organizations in the future.

"Pros will soon swing data-collecting racket"

From SportsBusiness Daily

Analysis by Annie Comber in SRM 435 (section 1)

After years of research and planning the historic racket company Babolat, has created the first “plug-in” racket of its kind. This new racket is called the Babolat Play, which allows players to collect data of their performance after playing. The high-tech racket enables players to connect through Bluetooth connection with a Smartphone or from a USB in the handle of the racket and connect to a computer or tablet. Sensors in the handle of the Babolat Play are responsible for collecting information about the player’s game. This racket can measure various performance data such as shot power, ball impact location, number of strokes, spin level, total and effective play time, endurance, techniques, consistency, energy, and rallies. Players can then compare and share either information online through Babolatplay.com and on a Babolat Play app. The racquet has been approved for play by the International Tennis Federation but not until January of 2014. 

From a marketing prospective, the Babolat Play has been slow to launch in the United States however with the use of social media, a famous spokes person and onsite activation, Babolat hopes the top players will be using the racket in the near future. Babolat is a French company that has always launched their rackets in Europe but they have decided to take a new approach and introduce it in the Unites States first because of the strong presence of social media and other wired sports equipment products. Babolat is planning to promote the racquet by traditional advertising in tennis outlets as well as some social media outlets and events. In addition, Rafael Nadal arguably one of the greatest tennis players in the world and is the official spokes person for the Babolat Play racket. Nadal has practiced with this racket and has created a few promotional videos while giving Babolat key feedback. As part of a promotion Nadal used his Facebook page to engage with fans and get them excited for the Babolat Play racket and then chose three fans to speak with him on the phone. Currently ranked number two in the world with over five million twitter followers, Babolat could not have picked a better spokes person for the new racket. In addition, American Express has a two-story, fan suite at the US Open that is the most trafficked on-site activation area at the open. The large space has 6-by-30 foot digital board that lets fans create Art by swinging a racket. There are also full tennis courts for clinics for kids and adults to improve their tennis skills. The Babolat Play racket is not yet incorporated into the American Express Fan Experience but this may be the next step to market the racket. This article relates to our class because it explains how new technologies in sports equipment will be marketed in the future. Babolat show us the effectiveness of marketing in the media via Facebook, Twitter, and videos, while having a famous spokes person promoting the racket as well. Technology in tennis equipment is a new concept for many athletes and fans but with the proper marketing and promotion techniques gathering data about ones’ tennis game will soon become the norm.

---

Analysis by Stephanie Nielsen in SRM 435 (section 1)

The world of sports is constantly changing and improving as the years go by. New additions to technology keep appearing and adding more to the athletes and games that we love to watch. The newest phenomenon that is offered for individual athletes is the ability to have devices that can record and track their play during competitions. The Babolat Play Racket is a new addition to the world of tennis and is scheduled to hit the market in January of 2014.

Babolat is a French tennis, badminton and squash equipment company that is best known for its strings and tennis rackets that are used by several top players, such as Rafael Nadal, Andy Roddick, Kim Clijsters and many others. The Play Racket offers many interesting features that will greatly benefit the development of professional and amateur tennis players. The product has sensors integrated into the handle allowing players to have access of information about their game. Shot power and ball impact location along with number of strokes (forehand, backhand, serve, smash), spin level, total and effective play time, endurance, technique, consistency, energy and rallies are all the types of data that are collected through the racket. After the player is finished the information is transmitted through a Bluetooth connection with a smart phone or a USB form. Through a marketing standpoint this individual racket is very pricey for the amateur tennis player. However, knowing the prices of private tennis pro lessons and clinics for this sport, this racket will be able to keep up and have the potential to become a driving force in the development of tennis players. Rafael Nadal is currently the company’s most prominent spokesperson. He is an extremely beneficial aspect to this campaign and product. The Babolat company will need to actively promote this product with social media campaigns to encourage fans to learn about the product. One campaign that Babolat has already done is a Facebook competition where three random fans were selected to have a conversation with Nadal. Another marketing opportunity for this product is for fans that are attending the U.S. Open to be able to test out this product. This will encourage fan involvement while the product is being implemented. The Babolat Play Racket may take a little more time to get off the ground and going but this is an innovative technology product that will open doorways for other individual and team sports to have products developed for their particular sports in the future.

"USOC expands 100-day countdown for Sochi"

From SportsBusiness Journal

Analysis by Michael Herndon in SRM 435 (section 2)

Starting from one hundred, the United States will be counting down the days until the start of the Sochi Olympics. This will be the third Olympics the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) has hosted this event held in Times Square. The purpose of the event is to celebrate an official countdown to the start of the Olympics, as well as celebrate and showcase the Olympians themselves. Year-by-year the event has started to gain more publicity, creating a higher demand for sponsors. 

This article explains what goes on at this event, the differences in the sponsors marketing over the years, and what it means to be a sponsor. The article starts out stating that the USOC expects more than 170,000 people to stop by at the event this year. This number would more than double the amount of people from the inaugural year for the Vancouver Games. The Event in Times Square marks the first event on their Road to Sochi Tour around the United States. Liberty Mutual will be the main sponsor out of twelve, where each sponsor will get their own activation area in Times Square. They will market their product while having activities to engage fans and anyone who walks by. Over the years this event has gone from hoping sponsors will want to market at the event, to sponsors seeing more value and looking to get a return on investment.

I believe marketing at this event is a great way to promote your brand because it contains almost all of the aspects of the sport promotional mix. Being in Times Square, there is tons of publicity. This publicity is free to the people walking through and visiting time square, and the event definitely stimulates demand for multiple products. They do this by having multiple incentives while using the technique of personal contact. In Times Square, there will be multiple Olympians/professional athletes along with engaging activities and performances from the Olympians. As for personal contact, they incorporate all three components: selling, monitoring, and servicing. They may not be charging any person to buy their product but the sponsors are trying to sell to customers that they have the best products. The organizations are monitoring how people act when they come into their activation area, as well as evaluating and re-evaluating their service to make sure it is a success, and will be in the future. When it comes to atmospherics, what more can you ask for. You are in the middle of Times Square with numerous Olympians, professional athletes, and other citizens who are all supporting the country they love, the United States.

Sponsorships are a big part of this article and I believe the sponsors did it right at this event. What I mean by this is that each sponsor had their own area to advertise their products. They were also able to bring a team out to the event to work with Olympians to get the right publicity. The hospitality of the event was great because they were using personal contact and helped create an atmosphere where fans are engaging in activities while enjoying their time in Times Square. As I’ve already talked about the incentives the event has, I think just being able to be in Times Square is enough of an incentive alone; same goes with atmospherics. Finally the community relations aspect of the event; clearly the event is being held in a great community, but this is only the opening stage for their four month tour. The USOC will be visiting twelve different cities around the United States to interact and connect with local communities all over the nation. There will be chances for donations and multiple giveaways, the Olympians/professional athletes will be performing and making appearances at activation areas, and there will be multiple on-site activities to get fans engaged, as I’ve stated before.

Overall, I believe this article connects to our class in multiple ways. I’ve already explained how this event pretty much incorporates all of the sports promotional mix that we have talked about in class. We have also talked about all the factors that have influenced growth in the sports industry. From the first year this event was held to now, there has been an increase in over 100,000 participants. I believe this is from the constant human interest in sports, along with sport business increasing in new diverse market segments. There has also been in increase in growth due to the new promotion and marketing techniques that they use to get people to come out to the event each year. As we’ve talked about in class, incentives are a great way to do this. Continuing forward, I believe this event will continue to grow and have an increase in the population of people that get involved. They incorporate sponsors who are using the sport promotional mix effectively, which creates an environment that people want to come back to. Not only has the event been run well, but this event is for a bigger event; the Olympics. I believe we take a lot of pride in our country when it comes to sports and this is another reason why the event in Times Square is a big success. Everyone is now waiting until the clock hits 100 days, for the countdown, to the Sochi Olympics.

---

Analysis by Michael Civiello in SRM 435 (section 2)

In this article the main focus was the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and its expansion of its sponsors for the upcoming pre-Olympic celebration held in Times Square. It is the third time this event has been held and the celebration itself is the start of the the “Road to Sochi Tour.” This tour is going across the country between November 2013 and February 2014. The event in Times Square is set to have 12 sponsors, all of which have their own “activation space.” Each sponsor is also assigned one of 12 sports interactive elements that fans can engage in. The sponsors include: Coca-Cola, AT&T, Budweiser, Chobani, Folgers, The Hartford, Hilton, Jif, Kellogg’s, United, and Smucker’s jams.

The event itself has grown not only in sponsors, but in attendance as well. The first year before the Vancouver games, 75,000 people came out to the inaugural event. Prior to the London games, 175,000 people showed up. This year’s event is expected to have 170,000 people. There has been more incentive to sign up for this event according to USOC’s chief marketer Lisa Baird. She thinks the incentive is the exposure for the different companies. That is a main reason Liberty Mutual signed up to be a lead sponsor. Their senior vice president of communications is quoted as saying: “…our presenting sponsorship of the Road to Sochi Tour provides Liberty Mutual Insurance the opportunity to expose the brand to millions of Olympic fans across the country…” The USOC itself has secured 12 billboards for branding its own logos and Pilobolus performance company who is doing a show as part of the event.

From marketing standpoint this event is a great way to promote a brand. Over 150,000 people are expected to be walking through Times Square, and will be able to have access to a company’s brand in some sort of way. Its up the company though, how they go about their “activation.” Lisa Baird, the USOC chief marketer, had a good point about the exposure, and each company will have a plan on how they want to engage each consumer. The USOC is helping with giving each brand an assigned event that fans can engage in. Its again up the sponsor on how effective they can sell it. A lot of activation could be giveaways, contests, enter to wins, etc.

The exposure a brand could get is unquestioned with how many people are expected to see it, but what could be questioned is why not more sports related companies and organizations trying to sponsor this event. It was shocking to see that not one was a known sport organization or company. The Olympics is the biggest sporting event in the world and it was very odd to see no related sponsors. The event is definitely growing, as attendance and sponsors have doubled since the last event before the London games in 2012. It was also mentioned that there were over 150 million media impressions. That is a whole lot of ways of getting a brand out. That statistic is a very high number and could definitely be an eye catcher for potential sponsors. With increasing attendance, it is not a stretch to say that there definitely will be an increase in sponsors to sign up. This article is relatable to the Sports Marketing course mainly for the fact that the focus of all this is geared toward the Olympics, aforementioned as the biggest sporting event in the world. It is something that potential sponsors would love to get a piece of, any type of way. One of those ways could be this 100 day-out celebration. It is definitely growing and could potentially expand even more. Any exposure for a brand is good and this is definitely a way to get a brand out to the public, and to a bigger audience not just in Times Square, but also across the country.

"Filling the Seats"

From Athletic Management

Analysis by Matt Nasca in SRM 435 (section 1)

This article focuses on the head baseball coach at Mississippi State University, Coach John Cohen. Coach Cohen has coached five seasons at Mississippi State, leading his team to the 2012 Southeastern Conference Tournament Championship and appeared in the NCAA tournament in both the 2012 and 2013 seasons and finished second place last year in the College World Series. So this coach is known for leading a successful Mississippi State baseball team, but he is also very well known for getting large attendance turnouts at the games. Coach Cohen has already set four of the program’s top six all time season ticket sales in just five seasons of coaching at Mississippi. In a game this past April against Auburn University more than 14,500 fans showed up, which was the second largest on campus crowd in NCAA history.

The coach said he gets successful turnouts like that by having his players go out into the community and interact and hand out tickets, instead of having a sales person going door-to-door trying to sell season tickets. He says his players receive life lessons while doing this, so it works to their advantage. He also has his players go around campus and hand out tickets to students or tell students to show up to the games, which greatly helps the high attendance numbers.

In my opinion I think this is a great way to market and get your team’s name out there. I personally would be way more inclined as a student to go to a game if an actual player came up to me, had a conversation and told me to come to a game. If I lived in a community and I saw the players going around talking to people, helping out and giving out tickets, than I would 100% go to the game to show my support since they are taking the time to come out and interact with other people. I would say that this is a risky way for a coach to market because if I were a college level coach, I would have my team practicing all the time to get better and to be able to win. But since this team is showing that it can play successfully, I think the way Coach Cohen is getting people to show up is a very good idea. 

---

Analysis by Charles Higby in SRM 435 (section 1)

The Athletic Management Magazine website recently published an article about head coach John Cohen’s Mississippi State baseball success on the field, but focused on his role in maintaining the teams reputation as a leader in college attendance. There was also a mini-interview with the Mississippi State University baseball coach talking about his role in the attendance rates and the successful promotional tools he has instilled to do so. In five seasons Cohen has led the team to the 2012 Southeastern Conference Tournament championship, appearances in the 2012 and 2013 NCAA tournaments, including a second place finish in the 2013 College World Series. Attendance wise, in an April game against Auburn over 14,500 fans packed into Polk-Dement Stadium at Dudy Noble Playing Field, marking the second largest on campus crowd in NCAA history. Also four of the teams top six all time season ticket sales occurred during Cohen’s time as coach. This in part is due to his hand with promoting the team and the promotional strategies he has created. One of these techniques was having season tickets hand delivered by his players that used the team’s recognition factor as a thrilling way for the community to interact with the team. Another technique was a free program called “the dudes” where MSU students are rewarded with incentives for attending home games. These have allowed Coach Cohen to keep the Mississippi State reputation as a leader in attendance. 

From a sport marketing and promotion standpoint, I believe these techniques are a great idea to implement. The coach’s tactics are tools that can build the Mississippi State baseball brand reputation and effectively get fans into the stadium. Having the players deliver tickets builds a lot more support in the community and gives the players experience interacting with their fans. The “dudes” club at MSU is similar to student clubs I have seen before, but the rewards they offer are personal and worthwhile drawing a huge student following to games. Coach Cohen has found a way to promote his team boosting attendance and season ticket sales through promotional strategies that at the same time builds community support, teaches players important lessons about interacting with fans, and turns students into lifetime fans.This article is very relevant to our sport marketing and sales course. To be a successful organization teams need to find innovative ways to attract fans that will buy tickets and fill up the stadium. This was an interesting story about how a coach used his knowledge and experience to create effective marketing/promotional programs that boosted attendance and built upon the team’s reputation. He already had a great marketing staff, but he found ways to use the player’s recognition to make more thrilling ways to attract fans. This is a great example of marketing your brand in the sports industry to improve the organization.

SRM Alumni Updates - September 24, 2013

Bryce Cocke ('13) recently accepted a position with the Orlando Magic as a Ticket Sales Representative. He most recently completed an internship with the Washington Redskins.

Jess Jarrett ('10) accepted the position of Athletic Facilities Coordinator of Bridgeforth Stadium at James Madison University.

---

Please send any alumni life/career updates to SRM@jmu.edu.

"South Carolina's Star Player Jadeveon Clowney Hasn't 'Lost His Swagger'"

From Bleacher Report

Analysis by Alex Mosley in SRM 334 (section 1)

Jadeveon Clowney is one of the most gifted, explosive and most talked about players in college football history. He makes freakishly great plays that seem impossible for a person of his stature, seem like routine plays. Not in recent years has a player, that plays the same position, created such a huge star power about themselves. The article talks about the media frenzy about the player known as the freak, Jadeveon Clowney. Clowney has unique abilities and skillset that separates him from other defensive lineman. His size, strength, quickness and agility are all qualities that give him an advantage and gave him the identity of being known as the “freak”. A major quality that he has is being able to use both his left and right hands when getting into a stance. Coaches truly admire this as I allows him to play on both sides of the line which does not allow offenses to key on where he is going to be. That is a quality most guys in college do not have, as they are only comfortable with using their right hand. Wrapping all of these qualities into one and combining that with great technique has allowed him to be recognize as one of the best football players in the country. Coming into the year he was seen as a Heisman Trophy candidate and potential number one overall draft pick. The hype that surrounds him was accelerated throughout the summer in anticipation for another breakout yea. After a win against rival North Carolina, he faced major criticism. Clowney had only three tackles and was condemned to being “out of shape” as he seemed to have taken plays off. It was later discover he had a stomach virus the day before, but the criticism still followed. The media still ran with it as it seemed now that he was more human as he did not make the plays fans and reporters were accustomed to. What the article focuses on is that he is human and that though he has yet made any highlight plays, he still is “the freak” for a reason because of his major impact on the field.

It is ironic as to how media can create such hysteria on one person, build them up give them insane hero like abilities then break them down and overanalyze that same person. Jadeveon Clowney has been viewed as a freak of nature in the media, the hype surrounding him is unreal as it is said that he could play in the NFL right now. For a college football player, that is one major statement . Though is a great player, the media depiction of him makes one believe that he is somewhat of a superman and will make every single play. That is not the case as it was evident in his first couple of games this year. He has made plays but offenses realize his dominance and scout around him. If you listen to media reports though, you would think that he has made no plays and that he was over hyped. In my opinion, the media overanalyzes him, on one hand when he makes plays he’s the most dominant player in college football and on the other hand when he doesn’t make the highlight play, he is seen as being no as dominant.

---

Analysis by Dana Allaband in SRM 334 (section 1)

Jadeveon Clowney, a defensive end for the University of South Carolina, was recognized for his sack against Michigan’s player Vincent Smith. This was Clowney’s rise to fame, just one hit and he immediately spread throughout social media. Since then Clowney has been scrutinized for his performance in his games thus far for the 2013 season.

In the article “South Carolina’s Star Player Jadeveon Clowney Hasn’t Lot His Swagger,” Brian Leigh explains how much the media has been extremely critical over Clowney’s performance on the field. Leigh states that the public has created the image that Clowney is a “God.” That due to one impressive highlight play, he will now be expected to perform at that level every game and if he does not the world will hear about it. For instance in the article, it states that Clowney was ranked first in a poll for the Heisman award after his highlight play. Now after only three games into this season he is left off the list completely. Also Leigh states that, “there was a time when Clowney was the bar-none favorite to go No. 1 in next April's NFL draft,” and this now has become questionable. The medias’ involvement in Clowney’s life has essentially altered it. In this instance Leigh is explaining how the media has become overly involved in Clowney’s life and he is defending him to a degree. Leigh states that the this issue with “impossibly high standards; they’re impossible.” Meaning that the media should not portray him as this unbelievable player. They should just state facts and statistics and let the public form an opinion about Clowney’s ability to play instead of being influenced by the media. For instance after South Carolina’s game against UNC the media stated that he was tired throughout the game, that he had to be pulled off, and that he will not win a Heisman with that performance. When in reality, if the public watched the game they would see that he performed extremely well against UNC. For most of the game he was double teamed, UNC placed two players to block him. Even with this in front of him Jadeveon managed to force UNC to rush their plays for a majority of the game. This exemplifies how the media can tweak a story so that the public will become interested and want to talk about it. Overall Jadeveon Clowney, an exceptional player, has become a name in the media and his performance this year will be scrutinized by the media because of this. The question left to ask is how will he react?

"Army Sponsors Tough Mudder Obstacles in an Attempt to Recruit 'Army Strong' Soldiers"

From Athletic Business

Analysis by Jordan Underwood in SRM 435 (section 2)

You often hear of people competing in 5K’s and the recently popular Color Run, but how many people do you know that have participated in a Tough Mudder. Another recently popular fad, the Tough Mudder is designed for the true athlete to test their mental, physical and emotional strength. These courses take place around the world and are 10-12 miles of pure strength and endurance. Participants register in teams, because the course is seemingly impossible to complete alone. Through out the course, teammates must assist each other throughout various obstacles such as a 12 foot wall, swimming in freezing cold water, and crawling through tight pipes into freezing mud; simply to name a few. 

The Army has recently decided to sponsor eight Tough Mudders in support of the organizations meaning and goals. Tough Mudder raises money for the Wounded Warrier Project and has raised over $6.5 million to date. During the races sponsored by the Army, soldiers will be present to help assist competitors at the various obstacle stations.

By sponsoring Tough Mudder events, the Army is not only getting positive publicity through working with the community, but it is giving the community a chance to work hand in hand with the Army soldiers. Knowing that Army soldiers are going to be at a specific Tough Mudder event might further inspire someone to sign up. Tough Mudder and the Army together create a great partnership. The Tough Mudder truly can be viewed as your normal, everyday person, without any military training, seeing if they can mentally and physically endure what the soldiers can. It is a great success to finish the course, but having an Army Soldier by your side cheering you on and helping you when you may not believe in yourself anymore is truly an accomplishment.

---

Analysis by Lindsay Brauch in SRM 435 (section 2)

Have you ever loved a good challenge? Well, the Tough Mudder is designed for people like you. It’s a 5K-race set up with obstacles that could kill you. People are actually willing to run through fire, swim through ice water, climb through mud pits, crawl under barbed wire, and participate in other military like obstacles. They have created a test that allows people to assess if they are “Army Strong.”

Recently, the Army started a new campaign where they sponsor eight of the obstacles courses in the Tough Mudder. The Army hopes to show participants what it takes to be in the Army. As quoted in the article, “the sponsorships are targeted at Tough Mudder participants seeking to test their mental, emotional, and physical strength.”

One of the most prevalent things the Tough Mudder is known for is their support of the Wounded Warrior Project. It’s a program to help veterans with employment, counseling for posttraumatic stress disorders, and other things associated with their health and wellness. So far, the Tough Mudder's have raised $5 million dollars in about two years for this program. Every race, Tough Mudder sponsors a team of wounded warriors to participate in their obstacle course.

In order to promote the obstacles sponsored by the Army, soldiers were at every one of their eight obstacles to encourage and engage the participants. They were even there to assist them, as they wanted to encourage teamwork. The thought behind the Army’s sponsorship is to appeal to and reach more military members and families to enter the Tough Mudder events.

Tough Mudder has done a great job promoting itself. To start, they have the Wounded Warrior project, and if you look on their website they have a running donations section where you can see just how much money they raised. When this article came out on the 13th of September they said they had raised $5 million, and if you look on the site now it’s already at $6 million. They have done a nice job promoting their cause by informing their participants at the race and on their site. They also offer volunteering opportunities at every race. The promotion behind this is that if you volunteer you then get to run for only $20. If you run alone, it is roughly $115.It even cost money just to be a spectator.

The Tough Mudder has done such a good job with sales that you must register months in advance to even get the opportunity to race. It has quickly become a global company. They offer races all over the world. It is so intense that they offer a Tough Mudder boot camp course because it really is that intense. You have to be in fantastic shape, or “Army Strong.” The new sponsorship has opened the race to a whole new target market, helping to promote the success and sales of the company. It’s also hard to forget a race that offers you a cold beer once you complete it. Also the fact that you need to sign a death waiver before you can race gives it a challenging edge. Its something I even want on my bucket list. There really isn’t any other competition in its market, it’s that unique. This relates to what we are learning about in class based on the fact that it’s a success is solely based on its ticket sales and how it’s promoted. They also have several sponsorships and promotional deals to draw in consumers. In class, we are learning how important these promotions are and how to keep consumers coming back. The Tough Mudder has developed their own market with virtually no competition and has found a way to keep loyal customers by changing up their obstacles and having sponsorships like the one they have with the Army. They also offer many incentives when you register, including free gear and bragging rights. Their marketing team has done an excellent job so far. Tough Mudder has promoted themselves in a positive light towards the community through their charities. I am excited to see what types of obstacles they come up with next.

Owners planning to have players miked up

From ESPN.com and Wall Street Journal

Review by Steve Robertson III in SRM 435 (section 1)

Over the past few years, the NFL, believe it or not, has been struggling to fill its stadiums. Fan turnout to games is nowhere near as high as they have been in years past; in fact over the past 6 years the a average fan attendance has dropped by 4.5%. Why is this? Some would say the economy, why others believe the prices that are being charged not only for tickets but concession are absurd, but also the advances in the at-home viewing experience has improved immensely too. My group decided to do our presentation on the changes that the NFL plans to make in the coming season and beyond through the use of two articles we found. The first is by Kevin Clark of the Wall Street Journal, whose article is titled, “Game Changer: NFL Scrambles to Fill Seats.” The second article is by Daniel Kaplan, writer for the Sports Business Journal, whose article is titled, “Listen Up: NFL Moving to Mike Players.”

The NFL is pushing out new perks for season ticket holders and well as fan that attend the game at their respected stadium. Some of these new features include, a free NFL RedZone Subscription, In-Booth Camera review (aka Challenge Camera), locker room camera access, Wifi, and now installing microphones on the players! These a drastic improvements that have really caught the fans attention because of all of this up-to-date technology being executed. The only issue is that if the fans can get/or have access to this perks at home, has the NFL really won the competition. I would think not.

If you think about why an average fan would want to watch a game at their own home, typically it is because they enjoy the own comfort of their home. Think about it, you can have people over, you have an unlimited number of snacks that costs a quarter of what you would be charge to eat at the game, and you have some many more options of games to watch, whether it is live streaming of a game or another game being shown on a different network, and let’s not forget you can drink as much as you want and not have to worry about getting home because you are already there! It is insane! Why would a fan ever want to give up an opportunity like that?

I feel it’s because of two reasons, fan loyalty and tradition. If you were to think about it, season ticket holders for fans who have been apart of the Green Bay Packers and Redskins whose seat are on the 50 yard line and 3 rows back from the field, I can guarantee those tickets have been past down for nearly 3 generations. That is where tradition plays a huge role. It is a big way to bring a family together and have them all share an amazing game day atmosphere whether it is 90 degrees outside or even 10 degrees. The fact of the matter is that the loyalty that they have for their team is one that doesn’t truly need all the perks to keep them coming back for more. I mean sure it might help, but the fact of the matter is that a true die-hard fan will attend these football games because these football games impact their lives in so many ways.So in conclusion, I feel with the additions that the NFL has/plan to implement in the coming seasons, I do think it will work but not forever. I feel more fans will begin to get pulled back to the stadiums because of these new perks and I think these new traditions and fan loyalties will grow again among a new generation. If the NFL can keep up with the in-game home experience for the most part, with integrated technology at these games that fans can relate to, I feel the NFL will be just fine!

---

Review by Connor Butler in SRM 435 (section 1)

Having players get mic’d up for a game is a promotional concept the NFL has used for years. Now, NFL teams are attempting to mike players for in-stadium use to go along with many other promotions. Recently, I read two articles: One from the Wall Street Journal article entitled Game Changer: NFL Scrambles to Fill Seats, and one entitled Listen Up: NFL Moving to Mike Players from the Sports Business Journal. This brief review will give a brief summary of both articles, a critical analysis of each article from a marketing and promotional standpoint, and discuss how this is all relevant to our class, SRM 435. 

The first article, Game Changer: NFL Scrambles to Fill Seats, written by Kevin Clark, gives a broad overview of the issues currently affecting the NFL, and the many steps, including miking players, that the NFL is taking to address it. After bluntly stating the issue, the writer offers out many ways in which the NFL is attempting to address the issue, such as miking players and coaches for in-stadium use, stadium wifi, watering down the blackout rule, and “liberalizing” restraints on crowd noise to give stadiums college like atmospheres. As the article wraps up, the article states that some developments in using these new technologies as vehicles may be a long way off.

Fast forward a little over one year when Listen Up: NFL Moving to Mike Players written by Daniel Kaplan, a staff writer for the sports business journal was released. The article, in support of the previous article, begins by stating the NFL is moving to put microphones on players and coaches as another step in the leagues ongoing push to improve fans’ in-stadium experience. The article continues on to compare the situation to NASCAR, stating that the professional racing league has never hesitated to let fans hear the conversation between spotters and drivers, and that multiple teams are equally enthused by the idea. Towards the end of the article, the writer discusses the censorship, or lack of, of the miking. The current debate in player miking is over whether audio should be exclusive stadium use, and whether the audio would be broadly available, or available on an individual basis, like using an online app.

From a sports marketing, promotion, and sales standpoint, I believe that these many new promotions would be a great idea for encouraging the average fan to come spend money in your stadium. Often times, the average fan is a much harder sell than your hardcore follower and is going to need much more promotionally to attract them to an event. These many new features could provide the extra push to help increase ticket sales. This all, of course, hinges on all of these features staying free. If they are not free or will cost extra, I think it serves no purpose in attracting the average fan. When it comes to your hardcore fans, I think that these many new promotions serve no purpose. A team’s hardcore fans will be there no matter what and often times won’t need a promotion to get them there. While the incentives could serve as a cool addition to their experience, I don’t see these things being deal breakers.

When I think of how this relates to class, the first thing I think of is my experience working the St. Francis game with the marketing department. Before the game, some students were going around passing out promotional items, and inside of the gate before kickoff we were all passing out thunder sticks as even more promotional items. Obviously what the NFL is attempting to do is on a much larger scale, but I feel as though it’s a similar concept. Promotions are a very large part of marketing, which helps increase sales; the two main subjects of our course.These articles were two very well written articles that were fun to review and enjoyable to read. Because of these articles, I am now hooked to see where the NFL goes when it comes to the in-stadium experience.

"Eagles receiver Riley Cooper uses racial slur at a Kenny Chesney concert"

(Disclaimer: this video contains a sensitive subject matter)

From USA Today

Analysis by Sean Wheeler in SRM 334 (section 2)

On June 9th, 2013, Riley Cooper, Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver, alone with his coach and some of his teammates attended a Kenny Chesney concert in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cooper, teammate Jason Kelch, and coach Chip Kelly were invited on stage by Kenny Chesney to perform his song, “Boys of Fall.” Cooper then, after a security guard did not allow him to go backstage, said a racial slur regarding African-Americans. On top of that, Cooper also got into a verbal altercation with people outside of the concert. After all of this hit the fan, Cooper released a serious of tweets apologizes for the incident, as well as, personally apologizing to his black teammates. He was eventually fined and sentenced to three days of sensitivity training.

From a media standpoint, this was blown way out of proportion. The media has the power to “blow-up” stories and this was exactly the case. The media made it seem like Cooper committed a serious crime and even publically viewed him as someone like Aaron Hernandez, New England Patriots wide receiver who was recently charged with murder. Cooper understandably did and said a horrible thing, but he did not commit a crime and, therefore, should not have made national news.

Another point to be made, regarding the media, is that everything is documented now-a-days. Because of the advancement in technology this past decade, not so important stories like this are being viewed and taken to levels they should not be taken to. For example, without cell phones and cameras this incident never would have been made publically like it did. People in this generation care more about taking a picture or video of something rather than fully enjoying the experience firsthand and not through a lens. Sure, people would talk and a good amount would have found out about it, but it would not have been talked about around the entire world (twitter). Furthermore, because of twitter, it allowed anyone to voice their opinions on Cooper to millions of people, which they absolutely did. Other athletes, like Marcus Vick, and many non-athletes showed their anger and attacked Cooper via twitter. This would have never happened ten years ago before twitter and all of this advanced technology was created. The Riley Cooper incident is relevant to this course because this is a textbook situation that we could be in and might have to deal with in the future. Whether it be working in PR or being an SID, you never know what you might have to deal with or the decisions regarding players’ actions that you are going to have to make, especially due to the fact that athletes are constantly acting as they should not be and doing “stupid” things. Furthermore, this is relevant because we learned about the advancement in technology and how it took over the media; one little slip-up can make national news and really turn someone’s life around.

---

Analysis by Brooks Shyman in SRM 334 (section 2)

For our current event Sean and I chose the topic of Riley Cooper and we chose the article “Eagles Receiver Riley Cooper Uses Racial Slur at Kenny Chesney Concert.” The article starts by giving you background on what happened before the event. It tells you that Cooper and some of his teammates were even invited on stage to perform the song “Boys of Fall” with Chesney. Then the article goes on to explain the event behind Cooper using the racial slur. It also tells you that Cooper got into another verbal altercation with a group of people outside the concert, and has videos of both incidents. The article concludes by telling you how the Eagles organization feels about the article and tells whether or not they think the NFL will discipline Cooper.

The media took this story and ran with it. It was major news the second the video became public. This happened in large part to technology improving. Think about it, would this have even been a story 10 years ago in a time before cell phones and cell phone cameras? Now a day for athletes everything you do is documented and can be out in the media within 10 seconds of you doing it. Another media aspect to this story is twitter. Many athletes and celebrities were able to tweet out there opinions to millions of people in an instant. Even Cooper’s teammates were going out on twitter and criticizing him. But not only were people able to tweet their opinions; they could tweet directly to Riley Cooper themselves. And while I did not tweet to him, I can only imagine the kind of messages he was receiving. This story also shows you the power the media holds. This Riley Cooper incident in the media was about as big a story as Aaron Hernandez; and Aaron Hernandez is accused of murder. And of course, what Riley Cooper did was terrible, but to be held on virtually the same level as someone who’s accused and likely guilty of murder really shows you the power the media has over public opinion.

This article/incident is very relevant to us as a class. We all want to go into different jobs in this field, and some of us are bound to end up working in media. Whether its being in PR and having to clean up an incident in, or being a journalist and writing an article; it’s a predicament any one of us can be caught in the middle of. Also the media is changing, and it’s something that we will all have to adjust to. With all different kinds of social media out there, there are a lot more ways to break a story.

"Special Report on Oklahoma State Football: Part 5 -- The Fallout"

From Sports Illustrated

Analysis by Lindsay Butler in SRM 334 (section 2)

The Oklahoma State scandal is something we have seen time and time again in the world of college level sports. Players receiving payments or benefits of some sort as an incentive to push them to do their best and win is not a dirty secret kept by few, but instead a major issue on the rise, specifically in football. Although, Sports Illustrated shocks its audience when in a five-section spread they expose not only cash rewards but also drug use, female hostesses used for sex, and the falsifying of grades. With numerous players coming forward with allegations and accusations made against boosters, professors, and coaches the media became the number one information source for curious readers. 

Sports Illustrated broke the story in a way that would draw reader’s attention and keep them wanting more. Disguising an over talked on issue as something much more they released the story in sections with each headliner completely different from the last and never giving readers a conclusion telling them to wait for the next section. A cleaver marketing strategy that worked just how the SI team planned. Whether you believed the stories being released or thought it was a load of junk you would still read the story upon it being released to judge the information provided. After the fifth section finally hit the public, media sources of every kind began examining the content and looking to interview any party associated with the scandal.

ESPN reacted immediately with an article that questioned the credibility of those quoted in the SI release and pulled facts that disproved multiple claims made within it. With two of the largest sports outlets in the nation touching on the issue Oklahoma all of a sudden became a hot commodity and was receiving media coverage from every angle. If you hadn’t had the opportunity to read the full story on Sports Illustrated you could easily gain access to it through a link posted at the end of the article released in response to it by ESPN. In the modern world we live in today the internet is a powerful source and this scandal was not going to escape from it. Looking toward social outlets such as Twitter we see not only the accused players responding to the article but news sources tweeting quotes from interviews with those affected by its accusations. Potentially one of the most impacting articles in response to SI’s was from Kansas City Sports where they finally said what no one else had, “who cares”. Quotes from this particular article spread like wildfire through short clips posted on YouTube, and once again Twitter. As fans and spectators we crave the most up to date news on our favorite teams and wait for bad exposure for our least. It is the job of members of the media to exploit stories such as the scandal in Oklahoma State. The media touches the lives of nearly every citizen daily and it is their responsibility to find a way to make us stop and look at the stories they provide us with. The headlines chosen by Sports Illustrated were short and to the point so readers knew exactly what that portion of the article would be about before reading the first sentence. By breaking their story into sections SI also ensured that the interest level of readers would stay high until they had all the dirty details and could make a firm opinion of their own. Within the world of sports, communications is critical for the reason that it can either benefit you or you can become victim to its wrath but you can’t escape it. As a student with intentions of working in the field of sports I believe having the knowledge of dealing with media is extremely important for a successful career.

---

Analysis by John Boitnott in SRM 334 (section 2)

The five parts series of Sports Illustrated’s investigation into Oklahoma State’s football program included over 60 interviews of former players who talked about their experience while at the school. The five series addressed the money, the academics, the drugs, the sex, and then the fallout faced by many players after they were no longer on the team.

This story was investigated and reported by Sports Illustrated, arguably the nation’s most popular sports magazine. Whether through television channels, websites, social media, or in this case print media, the sports stories we talk about and discuss with the people around us are all influenced by the media and help shape our views of the issue. While these days ESPN seems to always be the ones that come out with the breaking news of what is going on in the sports world, it was interesting that Sports Illustrated (SI) was the first one to reveal the story. Most everyone in our class seemed to think that print media will completely die off within 10-15 years and is becoming less relevant to how we find out information. But with SI being the first to find out and tell us the information on such a huge story it showed that print media may not be as far behind digital and social media as some think. Because of a media source breaking the story the NCAA will most likely conduct their own investigation in the matter soon, and if SI didn’t shed light on the matter it is very possible the NCAA would not have found out about all the infractions and violations.This article was relevant to the course because it focuses on things we have discussed during class, such as how the players were interviewed and also how media loses trust when coaches or administrators do not communicate with the media. Both coaches Miles and Gundy would not talk about the subject when SI asked to interview them about what they knew, which led to the tone of the article having a lack of trust in the coaches due to their non-compliance when asked about the possible infractions their players may have committed.

"How Twitter Amplify May Change Sports And Social Media As We Know It"

From SportsBusiness Journal, USA Today, and Forbes

Analysis by Griffin Waugh in SRM 334 (section 1)

Recently, Twitter hired former Professional Bowlers Association CEO Geoff Reiss to be the head of sports partnership. This comes at the same time as Twitter filling its initial public offering. As a publicly tradable company, Twitter is estimated to be worth $12 Billion and wants continue grow its connections with other entities. Reiss will now help Twitter to gain a larger hold on various media companies. They already have deals with media outlets like ESPN and Fox Sports. Reiss has an experienced background with creating major sporting deals, such as when he convinced ESPN to extend its contract with the PBA as well as to show more bowling telecasts on the ESPN family of networks throughout the year.

The second article I read dealt with how Twitter has set itself up for success. Twitter has based its profitability off of its advertising revenue and its connections with other entities. So far Twitter has already begun partnering with content providers like ESPN, Turner Sports, MLB Advanced Media and many more. By creating this partnership with these companies, Twitter can then help to readjust the way these providers deliver their material. We have seen this already with ESPN on college football game days. Instead of just posting game casts, drive summaries and stats on their main website. They now post short clips of all the big plays going in the football games on that particular day. 

This growth of Twitter has changed the media and the way we receive content forever. We now live in an information driven society that constantly is looking for the fastest and easiest to get what we want. These two articles provide us with another example of just that. As Twitter continues to grow and partner with content providers they will help change the way we receive this information. Geoff Reiss may be a key cog in helping to create this shift in the way content providers get their information out quickly and in short bits. This is similar to what we have seen in class with other forms of media. Radio at one time was the primary way in which people heard about sports. That slowly changed with the rise of the television and society becoming more image driven. As Twitter continues to grow its capabilities and connections, we should see a change in the way media provide their content. Not to different from a short 140 character tweet, the information we receive on sports will become shorter and more highlight driven. In order to satisfy the needs of sports fans.

---

Analysis by David Hoye in SRM 334 (section 1)

Twitter has become one of the most popular websites visited today, with over 550 million users. In the sports world, millions of fans follow their favorite athletes, coaches and reporters, to receive up to date information and entertainment throughout the day. Just like any social media site, not all good comes from using the account. Many athletes, college specifically, have gotten into trouble with their tweets. Dealing with criticism has been difficult as student-athletes receive more recognition and stardom. Any fan can tweet at these college athletes, expressing brutal opinions on their performance.

An article in USA Today focuses on Willie Cauley-Stein, a University of Kentucky basketball star that ended up deleting his twitter account, resulting from the negative tweets directed towards him during an underachieving freshman season (Auerbach). This happens all the time in college athletics. Some coaches at major programs don’t even allow players to tweet during season. This is done in a way to protect them from any distraction or emotional and mental harm they’d receive from fans. Assistant Professor Blair Browning from Baylor said, “(Twitter) can be a really constructive, positive tool but we need to train and educate our student-athletes instead of putting all this money toward being watchdogs." 

This really questions the fact if athletes should have Twitter at all. It can bring a lot of negativity to a player, team, and even university with the things that are said on timelines across the globe. It will be interesting to see if Twitter will be used continuously in the future if such controversy keeps occurring.

"Hawks fans ready for record roar"

From The Seattle Times

Analysis by Danielle Poplawski in SRM 435 (section 2)

On September 15, 2013, the Seattle Seahawks set the Guinness World Record for the “loudest crowd roar at a sports stadium” at CenturyLink Field. The Seahawks were playing their rivals, the San Francisco 49ers. This record-setting event was organized by the group Volume 12 and was not directly related to the Seattle Seahawks organization.

Seahawks fans pride themselves as being the loudest in the NFL. The crowd at the stadium is known as the 12th Man. Volume 12 is a group specifically for those who consider themselves to be a part of the 12th Man fan base for the Seahawks.

In July, Volume 12 announced that they would attempt to set the world record. To excite fans, the group held a tailgate outside of the stadium. The previous record of 131.76 decibels took place at Turk Telekom Arena in Istanbul on March 18, 2005 during a soccer match. Seattle’s CenturyLife Field broke this record twice in the same game. The first time in the first quarter with a level of 131.9 decibels while the second time took place in the third quarter with a level of 136.6 decibels.

To market the event, Volume 12 sent information, such as news releases, out to the media. In addition to this, they also made a YouTube video and posted on their various social media pages including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Pinterest. The week before the game, Sunday Night Football discussed the record-setting event and just how loud they thought it would be. The Seattle Seahawks have added the world record to their 12th Man page on the official website.

Holding the Guinness World Record for the loudest stadium will likely bring in some spectators who wish to see what all of the hype is about. Because of the 12th Man pride in Seattle, it also gives fans another commonality; thus uniting them more and providing the fans with more motivation to attend games rather than watch them on television. In a sense, a large part of the Seahawks game-day experience is the crowd, which requires a person to attend the game at CenturyLink Field.

The media attention gained from this event also brought attention to the Seahawks and their 12th Man. It is free publicity for the team. While discussing the world record, media outlets are also likely to discuss things such as the team’s record and other information. Volume 12 has also been able to gain from this event. The attention from media outlets has helped to spread their name and who they are. I believe that the Seahawks organization made a good decision in not being directly a part of the record-setting event. First, they were able to save time and money on promotions. Volume 12 took care of this all themselves and the Seahawks were still gaining attention. Secondly, by not becoming involved, it was less likely for the NFL to be able to intervene and cancel the event for any reason. Finally, by not putting their name on the event, the Seahawks organization can boast of the accomplishment that took place in their stadium without having to directly answer to any backlash.

---

Analysis by Eric Brent in SRM 435 (section 2)

In the Seattle Times article “Hawks fans ready for record roar,” the author discusses the fans of the Seattle attempting to set the record of the loudest crowd at a sports stadium. This was set to take place on September 15, 2013 at the Seahawk’s home opener against the San Francisco 49ers. All of the planning and execution was put on by Volume 12, which is a direct link to Seattle’s “12th Man” fan base. Joe Tafoya, co-founder of Volume 12, sent in an application without thinking too much of it, but a week and a half later to his surprise Guinness World Records was on board. Even with having knowledge of the approval the Seattle Seahawks organization itself continued to keep its distance from the event. No marketing or promotion of any kind was put on or linked to the organization.

At a time where it is difficult to get fans to come to experience a game at the stadium rather than sitting at home watching from their television, the Volume 12 found a way. Once Volume 12 found out Guinness World Records was on board, advertisements were placed on the Volume 12 social media sites (i.e. Facebook, Twitter), news releases were completed, YouTube videos were made, and NBC Sunday Night Football even mentioned the plan a week prior to the Seahawks Sunday Night Football game. The game not only sold out, but Seattle had its largest crowd ever a record breaking 68,338. This is the first time I have seen a marketing strategy involving fans setting a Guinness World Record, and it gave each person the opportunity to be a part of history. Not too many people can say they have been a part of breaking a world record.

This relates to the course due to the fact of all the conversation and discussion about how can we get people to the games and stay at the games and what are some unique ways to market a game. The opportunity to set a record caused the Seahawks to break another record that was not even being promoted, which was having the largest crowd attendance in Seattle Seahawks history. The reason I say it got people to stay at the game is because after the record was broken earlier in the game, it was not until the third quarter where the Seahawks fans set the highest mark of 136.6 decibels. From a marketing standpoint everyone involved indirectly or directly received great exposure. Seahawk’s organization probably benefited the most indirectly due to it being at their stadium and their team but having nothing to do with the planning. Volume 12 benefited the most directly because all of the planning and organizing was through that organization. NBC’s Sunday Night Football and Guinness World Records also received some good marketing because the game was held on NBC and Guinness was the reason Seahawk’s fans had this opportunity.